| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Secondary activities during automated driving | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRRF-84-32 | ||||||||
| Date |
22 Sep 2017
|
||||||||
| Summary | Vehicle manufacturer perspectives on the permissibility of non-driving activities by the operator of a highly automated vehicle. This presentation relates to discussions between traffic regulators (represented by UN Working Party 1) and vehicle regulators (represented by UN Working Party 29) on responses under traffic laws and vehicle regulations to the advent of automated driving systems. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | OICA | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | 1968 Vienna Convention and Automated Driving | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .pptx format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRRF | Session 84 | 19-22 Sep 2017 |
47. The Global Forum for Road Traffic Safety (WP.1) and GRRF held a joint session to exchange information on the activities of common interest. The event this time was focused on the topics of “secondary activities” and cybersecurity. The participants agreed that these joint sessions are constructive and contribute to a better understanding of the role of the driver in highly and fully automated vehicles. Both chairs agreed to explore possibilities at ITC session in 2018 for holding additional joint sessions in the future. |
||||||||