Main content of document from (D):
Purpose of this document is to describe a lane change test for ACSF systems
(OICA/CLEPA): Isn’t it better to make a static test, as explained in ACSF-03-05?
(D): The aim was to make the tests as simple as possible, but , a dynamic test is more realistic and so more appropriate.
(J): Isn’t it better to use the “national” max. speed
(D): Vehicles may be also exported to countries, where the speed limit is higher, so the functionality should be tested according with the proposed speed Δ.
(J-Chair): Confirms, also the higher speeds should be tested in Japan.
Homework: OICA to review this document.
Task List:
| ACSF-04-06 | review this document | OICA |
| ACSF-04-17 | 5.6.1.1.8 → make a new proposal | D + CLEPA |
| 5.6.1.6.(Protective Braking) → propose a new text (considering 5.6.1.2.5) | D | |
| Annex 7 – 3.1.2 Functionality Test (FU2) → generate a text | D | consider document ACSF-04-09 in the next text proposal | D |
| ACSF-04-13 | "Motorway” Definition → make a new proposal | D |
| 5.5.2 (PTI) → prepare the requirements for PTI until the next meeting | EC, SE, J, D | |
| 5.6.1.2.4 → rework wording | D | |
| 5.6.1.2.5 and 5.6.1.2.6 (Driver monitoring) → create a new proposal | SE | |
| 5.6.1.4 (Transition demand) → rework this paragraph using ACSF-04-18 and Japan comments | OICA |