Cybersecurity and OTA software updates task force session dedicated to discussion of interpretation documents to support the use of UN R155 on cybersecurity approvals and UN R156 on software update approvals.

Input concerning the selection and prioritization of traffic situations for development as scenarios under the VMAD activity and request for comments regarding concepts of “edge cases” and “baseline scenarios” and regarding diverse views on “three-layer approach”.

Draft VMAD subgroup paper describing the concepts for the development of scenarios for use in assessing automated driving systems.

Conceptual proposal for describing traffic scenarios under the New Assessment/Test Method for automated driving systems.

Japan answers to questions raised during VMAD discussions.

Clean version of the UN R155 interpretation document pursuant to the third TFCS ad hoc session.

Document as amended during the third day of the third TFCS ad hoc session.

Document as amended during the 2nd day of the third TFCS ad hoc session.

Updated version of the working paper on the “new assessment/test method” under development for automated driving systems.

Interpretation document as updated during the first day of the 3rd Interpretation Document ad hoc session of the Cybersecurity and Software Updates task force (27-29 July).

Template (reviewed by Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the European Commission, Japan, and France) for the exchange of type-approval information related to cybersecurity via the electronic Data Exchange for Type Approvals (DETA) system.

Updated version of the FRAV “Document 5” per changes agreed in document FRAV-03-05-Add.2. and revised format to improve tracking and document open issues.

Discussion paper to solicit input on scope and purpose of “System Safety” requirements, including on terms and definitions for use in such requirements.

Outcome of FRAV discussions on development of elements for ODD descriptions to be provided by manufacturers.

Proposals for “tasks and deliverables” with regard to enhanced child restraint systems and alternative seating configurations enabled by automated driving.

Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.

Proposal for the second step of a two-step introduction of car-to-bicycle provisions.

Proposal for the first step in a two-step introduction of car-to-bicycle provisions.

Proposal for a single step introduction of car-to-bicycle provisions.