GAR

← WP.29 190

Session 191

WP.29 192 →

13-16 Nov 2023 · Geneva

Agenda All Documents Formal Informal Adopted Report

4.8.8. Proposal for 01 series of Amendments to UN Regulation No. 145 (ISOFIX anchorage systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size)

Annotations

Documentation

ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/73, para. 43, based on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2023/12 as amended by annex XI to the report.

WP.29/2023/112	UN R145: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
WP.29/2023/112	UN R145: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
WP.29/2023/112/Corr.1	UN R145: Correction to document WP.29/2023/112
WP.29/2023/124	UN R145: Proposal for Supplement 3

Other submissions

WP.29/2023/124

UN R145: Proposal for Supplement 3

UN R145: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
Reference Number: WP.29/2023/112
Proposal to introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages.
Meeting Sessions: 191st WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2023)
Document date: 30 Aug 23
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 145 \| ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions
Adoption Vote
This proposal (WP.29/2023/112), as amended by WP.29/2023/112/Corr.1, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 57 applying UN R145 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
Click here to view the full document file

UN R145: Correction to document WP.29/2023/112
Reference Number: WP.29/2023/112/Corr.1
Meeting Sessions: 191st WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2023)
Document date: 13 Oct 23
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 145 \| ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions
Adoption Vote
This proposal (WP.29/2023/112/Corr.1) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 57 applying UN R145 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
Click here to view the full document file

UN R145: Proposal for Supplement 3
Reference Number: WP.29/2023/124
Proposal to amend the provisions for the number of ISOFIX positions if a built-in CRS is installed in that position to reflect the size ranges used in UN R129.
Meeting Sessions: 191st WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2023)
Document date: 31 Aug 23
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 145 \| ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions
Adoption Vote
This proposal (WP.29/2023/124), as amended by WP.29/2023/124/Corr.1, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 57 applying UN R145 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
Click here to view the full document file

UN R145: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
Reference Number: WP.29/2023/112
Proposal to introduce definitions, requirements and a test procedure for lower tether anchorages.
Meeting Sessions: 191st WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2023)
Document date: 30 Aug 23
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 145 \| ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions
Adoption Vote
This proposal (WP.29/2023/112), as amended by WP.29/2023/112/Corr.1, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 57 applying UN R145 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
Click here to view the full document file

UN R145: Correction to document WP.29/2023/112
Reference Number: WP.29/2023/112/Corr.1
Meeting Sessions: 191st WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2023)
Document date: 13 Oct 23
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 145 \| ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions
Adoption Vote
This proposal (WP.29/2023/112/Corr.1) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 57 applying UN R145 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
Click here to view the full document file