Proposal to differentiate between the scope of UN R79 and the proposed UN Regulation on Driver Control Assistance Systems (DCAS).

Proposal to clarify provisions concerning the type-IIA test and the test mass of vehicles authorized to tow trailer(s).

Proposal of an informal document superseding the formal document GRE/2023/17 to correct numbering.

Document GRVA-17-49 from the September 2023 GRVA session.

Copy of document GRVA-17-49.

Proposal to delineate the scope of UN R79 vis-à-vis the draft new UN Regulation on Driver Control Assistance Systems (DCAS).

Proposals to introduce provisions for adaptive front lighting systems (AFS) for motorcycles.

Proposal submitted by Germany on behalf of the GRSG task force on UN R46 to address surveillance cameras/mirrors under UN R26 (while removing related provisions from UN R46 on indirect vision).

Proposal from Germany on behalf of the GRSG task force on UN R46 to address surveillance cameras under UN R61 (while removing related provisions from UN R46).

This document summarises the reviews conducted by the GR working parties on the fitness for ADS of UN Regulations and GTR for application to ADS vehicles. This document represents the current opinions of the experts at the time of submission, and the recommendations contained inside may evolve significantly during the next steps of the process of reviewing and amending Regulations.

54. GRVA resumed its discussion on the inclusion of the vehicle categories R, S ad T in UN Regulation No. 155. GRVA recalled the preference of CEMA to cover cyber security of agricultural vehicles through the European Union (EU) Cyber-Resilience Act (CRA). The expert from Germany introduced GRVA-16-26, comparing UN Regulation No. 155 and the CRA with regard to CS requirements on agricultural and forestry vehicles. He concluded that the CRA was not the right instrument for agricultural vehicles. He recalled that UN Regulation No. 155 even covered trailers (Category O) and found remarkable that vehicles of Category T were not in the scope of this regulation.

55. The expert from CEMA commented that the document prepared by Germany offered a fair comparison. He explained that some variant of their vehicles did not belong to the vehicle Category T and therefore some vehicle types would be subject to two different regulations. He urged GRVA to not make quick decisions on this topic.

56. The expert from CLEPA proposed that also all Category L vehicles should be included in the scope of the regulation.

57. The expert from UK explained that his country had a similar act to the European CRA, aimed to be applicable to consumer goods. He explained that such acts were not stringent enough for agricultural vehicles. He recalled that the issue dated back from the sixth session of GRVA in March 2020, when the Category T was in square brackets and removed at the last minute to achieve consensus and manage adoption in a short and extraordinary session organized in the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. He noted that CEMA did not explain the elements of concern in UN Regulation No. 155 that would pose a specific issue for Category T vehicles.

58. The expert from Italy noted that the comparison did not show huge differences in terms of stringency between the Regulation and the European CRA. He proposed to freeze the discussion until CRA is adopted in Europe.

59. The expert from Germany noted that freezing the discussion would lead to a de facto decision, due to the way CRA was drafted, as it stipulates that it would apply to all products that are otherwise not already regulated regarding cyber security.

60. GRVA discussed that adding vehicle categories in the scope of UN Regulation No. 155 would provide the flexibility that a general act cannot provide and would permit to address specificities of all vehicle categories. GRVA noted the fact that CRA was not applicable for contracting parties outside of the EU. GRVA accepted the Chair’s proposal to finalize the discussion in September 2023.

50. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-73-57 on the outcome of the Task Force on Autonomous Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF AVRS) work. He explained that some of the findings can be solved by rewording UN Regulations under GRSP responsibility (e.g. references to “driver”, “steering control”, “Driver R-Point”). He added that some functions (e.g. tell-tales) and some situations like the transport of children on buses without a driver would need discussion in WP.29.

51. GRSP considered GRSP-73-57 to be final and agreed that the coordinated conclusions on TF AVRS in each Working Party be provided to the June 2023 session of WP.29.