|
Erratum by the secretariat
(2014)
|
|
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 10
(2000)
|
2
|
10
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 10 | Corrigendum 1
(2004)
|
2
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 11
(2000)
|
2
|
11
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 12
(2002)
|
2
|
12
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 12 | Corrigendum 1
(2002)
|
2
|
12
|
1
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 13
(2004)
|
2
|
13
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 14
(2006)
|
2
|
14
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 15
(2007)
|
2
|
15
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 16
(2010)
|
2
|
16
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 17
(2013)
|
WP.29/2012/48: Proposal adopted by the GRRF to harmonize definitions and marking requirements of UN R30 with the new 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 117 and clarifying the requirements for the load/speed performance test and to cover regulatory regulatory markings for "temporary uses spare tyres". With 39 of the 44 Contracting Parties applying UN R30 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2012/48, as amended by para. 50 per the session report, by a vote of 39 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
Discussion from 157th WP.29 session (26-29
Jun 2012)
|
|
50. Agenda item 4.9.2, UN Regulation No. 30, document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2012/48, Page 3, paragraph 3.4., correct to read:
- “3.4. The markings … in paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.1.14. above.”
|
|
2
|
17
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 18
(2017)
WP.29/2016/51: Proposal to- amend the tyre dimensional requirements,
- amend the requirements for the load/speed performance test,
- align definitions and content with the other tyre regulations (UN Regulations Nos. 117, 54, 75 etc.),
- include a definition of “manufacturer” extracted from the resolution R.E.3,
- adopt a common definition and use of the terms “Manufacturer’s name”, “Brand name”, “Trademark”, “Trade description” and “Commercial name” and their links, and
- add information in the certificate to enable approval authorities to more easily understand the products the certificate addresses.
With 38 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R30 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2016/51 by a vote of 38 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
2
|
18
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 19
(2018)
|
WP.29/2017/105: Proposal to correct paragraph number references due to the recent renumbering of definitions. With 37 of the 49 Contracting Parties applying UN R30 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/105 by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
2
|
19
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 20
(2018)
|
WP.29/2018/10: Proposal for editorial improvements, including to update a cross-reference in paragraph 3.4. to read “3.1.2” pursuant to the earlier division of paragraph 3.1 into separate paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.1.2. With 37 of the 48 Contracting Parties applying UN R30 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2018/10 by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
2
|
20
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 21
(2020)
|
WP.29/2019/50: Proposal to introduce a definition for “Extended Mobility Tyre” based on a new “minimum requirement” performance test procedure with the relevant pictogram to be used to properly distinguish such tyres and to ensure that that P-type tyres can be distinguished from non-P-type tyres. With 37 of the 50 Contracting Parties applying UN R30 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2019/50 by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
2
|
21
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 22
(2021)
|
WP.29/2020/72: Proposal to align definitions across tyre regulations and align the regulations with technological progress, correct an editorial error, and clarify that the ply rating is not applicable to T-type temporary use tyres. With 41 of the 51 Contracting Parties applying UN R30 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2020/72 by a vote of 41 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
2
|
22
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 23
(2021)
|
WP.29/2021/2: Proposal for amendments that allows for tyre marking methods other than moulding. With 37 of the 51 Contracting Parties applying UN R30 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2021/2 by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
2
|
23
|
|
|
|
UN R30 | 02 series of amendments | Supplement 24
(2022)
|
WP.29/2021/75: Proposal to amend the extended mobility tyre (EMT) symbol following the detection of dimensional inconsistencies within the International Organization for Standardization Working Group (ISO) TC31/SC3/WG19, where the dimension “0,33h” was judged wrong and constituting an unnecessary over constraint and to amend the inflation value to be used for the tyre conditioning when assessing the “flat tyre running mode” of “run flat tyres” and of “extended mobility tyres”. With 37 of the 51 Contracting Parties applying UN R30 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2021/75 by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
|
2
|
24
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 25
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
WP.29/2023/4: Proposal to address the definition of the radial structure, the definition of snow tyres, the requirements for special use tyres of class C1, the addition of an optional prefix for extra load tyres, a clarification of the description of the load/speed test for run flat tyres and extended mobility tyres (EMT) and editorial corrections.
|
|
|
|
2
|
25
|
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
| Supplement 26
(Formal GR review)
|
GRBP/2024/15: Proposal for editorial corrections.
|
|
|
|
2
|
26
|
|
|