| previous meeting | next meeting |
| Attendance | ||||
| 1. | Adoption of the agenda |
In accordance with Chapter III, Rule 7 of the Rules of Procedure (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/690 as amended) of the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), the first item on the provisional agenda is the adoption of the agenda.
GRVA-07-01 | GRVA 7th (September session): Running order of the agenda
GRVA-07-02 | GRVA 7th (September 2020) session: Information on virtual session format
GRVA-07-02 | GRVA 7th (September 2020) session: Information on virtual session format
GRVA-07-34/Rev.2 | Updated and consolidated agenda for the 7th GRVA session
GRVA/2020/19 | Provisional agenda for the 7th GRVA session
GRVA/2020/19/Add.1 | Annotated provisional agenda for the 7th GRVA session
|
GRVA-07-01 | GRVA 7th (September session): Running order of the agenda
GRVA-07-02 | GRVA 7th (September 2020) session: Information on virtual session format
GRVA-07-34/Rev.2 | Updated and consolidated agenda for the 7th GRVA session
|
|
| 2. | Highlights of the March and June 2020 sessions of WP.29 |
GRVA may wish to be briefed by the secretariat about the highlights of the March and June 2020 sessions of WP.29, regarding the activities of the Working Party on Automated/Autonomous and Connected Vehicles (GRVA) and common issues.
GRVA-07-13 | GRVA-related highlights of the March and June 2020 WP.29 sessions
GRVA-07-13 | GRVA-related highlights of the March and June 2020 WP.29 sessions
GRVA-07-13 | GRVA-related highlights of the March and June 2020 WP.29 sessions
GRVA-07-13 | GRVA-related highlights of the March and June 2020 WP.29 sessions
WP.29/1151 | Report of the World Forum/WP.29 on its 180th (March 2020) session
WP.29/1153 | Report of WP.29 on its 181st (June 2020) session
|
GRVA-07-13 | GRVA-related highlights of the March and June 2020 WP.29 sessions
|
|
| 3. | Exchange of views on guidelines and relevant national activities |
GRVA may wish to receive information on national activities related to vehicle automation and connectivity, if any. |
||
| 4. | Automated/autonomous and connected vehicles | |||
| 4. (a) | Deliverables of the Informal Working Group on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles |
GRVA may wish to be briefed on the outcome of the recent meeting(s) of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles. GRVA is expected to review, according to the framework document (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 as revised), common functional requirements on existing national/regional guidelines and other relevant reference documents (1958 and 1998 Agreements)
GRVA-07-54 | FRAV informal group status report
|
GRVA-07-54 | FRAV informal group status report
|
|
| 4. (b) | Deliverables of the Informal Working Group on Validation Methods for Automated Driving |
GRVA may wish to be briefed on the outcome of the last meetings of the IWG on Validation Methods for Automated Driving (VMAD). GRVA is expected, according to the framework document, to review the existing and upcoming methods and a proposed way forward for the assessment of Automated Driving Vehicles.
GRVA-07-55 | VMAD informal group status report
|
GRVA-07-38 | Presentation on virtual testing for motor vehicle performance validation
GRVA-07-55 | VMAD informal group status report
GRVA-07-76 | GRVA: List of decisions taken during the 7th (September 2020) session under the silence procedure
|
|
| 4. (c) | Deliverables of the Informal Working Group on Event Data Recorder / Data Storage Systems for Automated Driving |
GRVA may wish to be briefed on the outcome of the last meetings of the IWG on Event Data Recorder / Data Storage Systems for Automated Driving (EDR/DSSAD). GRVA is expected, according to the framework document, to review the existing national as well as regional activities, and a proposed way forward for DSSAD.
GRVA-07-57 | DSSAD: Review of the existing national/regional activities and a proposed proposed way forward
GRVA-07-58 | Status report of the EDR/DSSAD informal working group
GRVA-07-58 | Status report of the EDR/DSSAD informal working group
GRVA-07-60 | EDR: Proposal to amend document document WP.29/2020/123
Updated proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group for a new UN Regulation on Event Data Recorders.
GRVA-07-61 | EDR: Proposal to amend document WP.29/2020/100
Update proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal working group for Guidance on EDR Performance Elements Appropriate for Adoption in 1958 and 1998 Agreement Resolutions or Regulations.
|
GRVA-07-57 | DSSAD: Review of the existing national/regional activities and a proposed proposed way forward
GRVA-07-58 | Status report of the EDR/DSSAD informal working group
GRVA-07-60 | EDR: Proposal to amend document document WP.29/2020/123
Updated proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group for a new UN Regulation on Event Data Recorders.
GRVA-07-61 | EDR: Proposal to amend document WP.29/2020/100
Update proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal working group for Guidance on EDR Performance Elements Appropriate for Adoption in 1958 and 1998 Agreement Resolutions or Regulations.
|
|
| 4. (d) | UN Regulation on Automated Lane Keeping Systems |
GRVA may wish to consider a proposal for amendments to the UN Regulation on Automated Lane Keeping Systems (ALKS), tabled by the expert from Germany, aimed at raising the specified maximum speed up to 130 km/h.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-21 | UN R157: Proposal for clarifications
Proposal to clarify the text with regard to:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 2.6., Definition of an imminent collision</li><li>paragraphs 5.1.9 and 7.1.4., Lifetime of the system</li><li>paragraph 5.2.3.3., Traffic Rules and Safety Distance to the front</li><li>paragraph 5.2.5.2. – “anticipated TTC” in cut-in scenario</li><li>paragraph 6.2.5.1., Deactivation by input to driving controls</li><li>paragraph 6.2.6., Transition to assisted driving</li><li>paragraph 6.4.4., Examples of information to the driver</li><li>Annex 5 – Tests<ul><li>Section 5.1. contains physical tests that have to be performed at the time of type approval</li><li>Section 5.2. aims to confirm at the time of type approval, that the system complies with the corresponding provisions of the main text. This confirmation shall be done by at least one physical test per provision, if possible due to the nature of the provision, and may be supported by further evidence.</li><li>Section 5.3. is a collection of additional scenarios, that the ALKS could encounter. Whether they are relevant to the ALKS depends on its ODD. So either the manufacturer explains why his system will not need to handle these scenarios, or has to explain the behaviour of the ALKS. </li><li>larify the content of par. 5.2. by rewording the provisions similar to that of the core text.</li></ul></li></ol>
GRVA-07-26 | UN R157: Scope extension for commercial vehicles and buses
GRVA-07-27 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/32
Proposal to address risks related to activities other than driving and to clarify that a declaration of a maximum operational speed that exceeds 60 km/h is possible, but not required.
GRVA-07-28 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
Proposal to amend the proposal from Germany regarding lane-change functionality:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 5.2.1. – lane keeping</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.1. - risk to safety of the vehicle occupants and other road users</li><li>paragraphs 5.2.6.2. and 5.2.6.3. – preconditions for a lane change procedure</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.5. – timing of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.6. and its sub-paragraphs – criticality of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 7.1.3. – rear detection range</li><li>Annex 5. – test cases for rear detection range, lane change.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-30 | UN R157: Proposal for editorial corrections
The proposal aims to correct 5 types of inconsistencies:<ol class="alpha"><li>The reference to Annex 4 is repeated in each sub-paragraph and should instead be stated once in each paragraph. </li><li>Acronyms are used inconsistently. Proposal to use them consistently throughout similar to UN-R79, e.g. Emergency Manoeuvre (EM), and when used in the text as “emergency manoeuvre”</li><li>Each sub-paragraph has a heading, this helps understand the structure and should be carried over to par. 8.1., 9.1. and 9.2. as well, the wording for the heading of par. 9.1. and 9.2. are derived from UN-R155 and UN-R156 respectively.</li><li>Consistent use of term throughout, e.g. R<sub>157</sub>SWIN without blank, Cyber Security as two words as used in UN-R155</li><li>Editorial corrections, e.g. missing paragraph numbers, missing full stop in the paragraph number.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-30 | UN R157: Proposal for editorial corrections
The proposal aims to correct 5 types of inconsistencies:<ol class="alpha"><li>The reference to Annex 4 is repeated in each sub-paragraph and should instead be stated once in each paragraph. </li><li>Acronyms are used inconsistently. Proposal to use them consistently throughout similar to UN-R79, e.g. Emergency Manoeuvre (EM), and when used in the text as “emergency manoeuvre”</li><li>Each sub-paragraph has a heading, this helps understand the structure and should be carried over to par. 8.1., 9.1. and 9.2. as well, the wording for the heading of par. 9.1. and 9.2. are derived from UN-R155 and UN-R156 respectively.</li><li>Consistent use of term throughout, e.g. R<sub>157</sub>SWIN without blank, Cyber Security as two words as used in UN-R155</li><li>Editorial corrections, e.g. missing paragraph numbers, missing full stop in the paragraph number.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-31 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments - Scope extension
Proposal to include all vehicle categories M and N in the scope of UN R157.
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-62 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-63 | UN R157: Supporting presentation concerning amendments on speed range and lane-change functionality
GRVA-07-63 | UN R157: Supporting presentation concerning amendments on speed range and lane-change functionality
GRVA/2020/32 | ALKS: Proposal for amendment
Proposal to amend the ALKS UN Regulation provisions to enable approval of systems operating at speeds up to 130 km/h.
GRVA/2020/32 | ALKS: Proposal for amendment
Proposal to amend the ALKS UN Regulation provisions to enable approval of systems operating at speeds up to 130 km/h.
GRVA may wish to consider a proposal for amendments to the UN Regulation on ALKS, tabled by the expert from Germany, inserting additional requirements for a lane change functionality.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-21 | UN R157: Proposal for clarifications
Proposal to clarify the text with regard to:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 2.6., Definition of an imminent collision</li><li>paragraphs 5.1.9 and 7.1.4., Lifetime of the system</li><li>paragraph 5.2.3.3., Traffic Rules and Safety Distance to the front</li><li>paragraph 5.2.5.2. – “anticipated TTC” in cut-in scenario</li><li>paragraph 6.2.5.1., Deactivation by input to driving controls</li><li>paragraph 6.2.6., Transition to assisted driving</li><li>paragraph 6.4.4., Examples of information to the driver</li><li>Annex 5 – Tests<ul><li>Section 5.1. contains physical tests that have to be performed at the time of type approval</li><li>Section 5.2. aims to confirm at the time of type approval, that the system complies with the corresponding provisions of the main text. This confirmation shall be done by at least one physical test per provision, if possible due to the nature of the provision, and may be supported by further evidence.</li><li>Section 5.3. is a collection of additional scenarios, that the ALKS could encounter. Whether they are relevant to the ALKS depends on its ODD. So either the manufacturer explains why his system will not need to handle these scenarios, or has to explain the behaviour of the ALKS. </li><li>larify the content of par. 5.2. by rewording the provisions similar to that of the core text.</li></ul></li></ol>
GRVA-07-28 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
Proposal to amend the proposal from Germany regarding lane-change functionality:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 5.2.1. – lane keeping</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.1. - risk to safety of the vehicle occupants and other road users</li><li>paragraphs 5.2.6.2. and 5.2.6.3. – preconditions for a lane change procedure</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.5. – timing of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.6. and its sub-paragraphs – criticality of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 7.1.3. – rear detection range</li><li>Annex 5. – test cases for rear detection range, lane change.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-28 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
Proposal to amend the proposal from Germany regarding lane-change functionality:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 5.2.1. – lane keeping</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.1. - risk to safety of the vehicle occupants and other road users</li><li>paragraphs 5.2.6.2. and 5.2.6.3. – preconditions for a lane change procedure</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.5. – timing of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.6. and its sub-paragraphs – criticality of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 7.1.3. – rear detection range</li><li>Annex 5. – test cases for rear detection range, lane change.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-30 | UN R157: Proposal for editorial corrections
The proposal aims to correct 5 types of inconsistencies:<ol class="alpha"><li>The reference to Annex 4 is repeated in each sub-paragraph and should instead be stated once in each paragraph. </li><li>Acronyms are used inconsistently. Proposal to use them consistently throughout similar to UN-R79, e.g. Emergency Manoeuvre (EM), and when used in the text as “emergency manoeuvre”</li><li>Each sub-paragraph has a heading, this helps understand the structure and should be carried over to par. 8.1., 9.1. and 9.2. as well, the wording for the heading of par. 9.1. and 9.2. are derived from UN-R155 and UN-R156 respectively.</li><li>Consistent use of term throughout, e.g. R<sub>157</sub>SWIN without blank, Cyber Security as two words as used in UN-R155</li><li>Editorial corrections, e.g. missing paragraph numbers, missing full stop in the paragraph number.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-31 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments - Scope extension
Proposal to include all vehicle categories M and N in the scope of UN R157.
GRVA-07-45 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-62 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-62 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-63 | UN R157: Supporting presentation concerning amendments on speed range and lane-change functionality
GRVA-07-63 | UN R157: Supporting presentation concerning amendments on speed range and lane-change functionality
GRVA-07-66 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA/2020/32 | ALKS: Proposal for amendment
Proposal to amend the ALKS UN Regulation provisions to enable approval of systems operating at speeds up to 130 km/h.
GRVA/2020/33 | ALKS: Proposal for an amendment
Proposal to introduce additional requirements for a lane change functionality.
GRVA may wish to consider a proposal from the European Commission and Russia for improvements to the text.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-21 | UN R157: Proposal for clarifications
Proposal to clarify the text with regard to:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 2.6., Definition of an imminent collision</li><li>paragraphs 5.1.9 and 7.1.4., Lifetime of the system</li><li>paragraph 5.2.3.3., Traffic Rules and Safety Distance to the front</li><li>paragraph 5.2.5.2. – “anticipated TTC” in cut-in scenario</li><li>paragraph 6.2.5.1., Deactivation by input to driving controls</li><li>paragraph 6.2.6., Transition to assisted driving</li><li>paragraph 6.4.4., Examples of information to the driver</li><li>Annex 5 – Tests<ul><li>Section 5.1. contains physical tests that have to be performed at the time of type approval</li><li>Section 5.2. aims to confirm at the time of type approval, that the system complies with the corresponding provisions of the main text. This confirmation shall be done by at least one physical test per provision, if possible due to the nature of the provision, and may be supported by further evidence.</li><li>Section 5.3. is a collection of additional scenarios, that the ALKS could encounter. Whether they are relevant to the ALKS depends on its ODD. So either the manufacturer explains why his system will not need to handle these scenarios, or has to explain the behaviour of the ALKS. </li><li>larify the content of par. 5.2. by rewording the provisions similar to that of the core text.</li></ul></li></ol>
GRVA-07-28 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
Proposal to amend the proposal from Germany regarding lane-change functionality:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 5.2.1. – lane keeping</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.1. - risk to safety of the vehicle occupants and other road users</li><li>paragraphs 5.2.6.2. and 5.2.6.3. – preconditions for a lane change procedure</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.5. – timing of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.6. and its sub-paragraphs – criticality of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 7.1.3. – rear detection range</li><li>Annex 5. – test cases for rear detection range, lane change.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-30 | UN R157: Proposal for editorial corrections
The proposal aims to correct 5 types of inconsistencies:<ol class="alpha"><li>The reference to Annex 4 is repeated in each sub-paragraph and should instead be stated once in each paragraph. </li><li>Acronyms are used inconsistently. Proposal to use them consistently throughout similar to UN-R79, e.g. Emergency Manoeuvre (EM), and when used in the text as “emergency manoeuvre”</li><li>Each sub-paragraph has a heading, this helps understand the structure and should be carried over to par. 8.1., 9.1. and 9.2. as well, the wording for the heading of par. 9.1. and 9.2. are derived from UN-R155 and UN-R156 respectively.</li><li>Consistent use of term throughout, e.g. R<sub>157</sub>SWIN without blank, Cyber Security as two words as used in UN-R155</li><li>Editorial corrections, e.g. missing paragraph numbers, missing full stop in the paragraph number.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-31 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments - Scope extension
Proposal to include all vehicle categories M and N in the scope of UN R157.
GRVA-07-39 | UN R157: Request for interpretation regarding approaching emergency vehicles
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-59 | UN R157: Comments on document GRVA-07-06
GRVA-07-63 | UN R157: Supporting presentation concerning amendments on speed range and lane-change functionality
GRVA-07-69/Rev.1 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
This document was produced during an informal meeting (on 23 September 2020) of interested experts who reviewed the ALKS-related documents presented at GRVA on 24 September 2020.
GRVA may wish to consider additional submissions regarding UN R157 on automated lane-keeping systems.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-21 | UN R157: Proposal for clarifications
Proposal to clarify the text with regard to:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 2.6., Definition of an imminent collision</li><li>paragraphs 5.1.9 and 7.1.4., Lifetime of the system</li><li>paragraph 5.2.3.3., Traffic Rules and Safety Distance to the front</li><li>paragraph 5.2.5.2. – “anticipated TTC” in cut-in scenario</li><li>paragraph 6.2.5.1., Deactivation by input to driving controls</li><li>paragraph 6.2.6., Transition to assisted driving</li><li>paragraph 6.4.4., Examples of information to the driver</li><li>Annex 5 – Tests<ul><li>Section 5.1. contains physical tests that have to be performed at the time of type approval</li><li>Section 5.2. aims to confirm at the time of type approval, that the system complies with the corresponding provisions of the main text. This confirmation shall be done by at least one physical test per provision, if possible due to the nature of the provision, and may be supported by further evidence.</li><li>Section 5.3. is a collection of additional scenarios, that the ALKS could encounter. Whether they are relevant to the ALKS depends on its ODD. So either the manufacturer explains why his system will not need to handle these scenarios, or has to explain the behaviour of the ALKS. </li><li>larify the content of par. 5.2. by rewording the provisions similar to that of the core text.</li></ul></li></ol>
GRVA-07-21 | UN R157: Proposal for clarifications
Proposal to clarify the text with regard to:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 2.6., Definition of an imminent collision</li><li>paragraphs 5.1.9 and 7.1.4., Lifetime of the system</li><li>paragraph 5.2.3.3., Traffic Rules and Safety Distance to the front</li><li>paragraph 5.2.5.2. – “anticipated TTC” in cut-in scenario</li><li>paragraph 6.2.5.1., Deactivation by input to driving controls</li><li>paragraph 6.2.6., Transition to assisted driving</li><li>paragraph 6.4.4., Examples of information to the driver</li><li>Annex 5 – Tests<ul><li>Section 5.1. contains physical tests that have to be performed at the time of type approval</li><li>Section 5.2. aims to confirm at the time of type approval, that the system complies with the corresponding provisions of the main text. This confirmation shall be done by at least one physical test per provision, if possible due to the nature of the provision, and may be supported by further evidence.</li><li>Section 5.3. is a collection of additional scenarios, that the ALKS could encounter. Whether they are relevant to the ALKS depends on its ODD. So either the manufacturer explains why his system will not need to handle these scenarios, or has to explain the behaviour of the ALKS. </li><li>larify the content of par. 5.2. by rewording the provisions similar to that of the core text.</li></ul></li></ol>
GRVA-07-26 | UN R157: Scope extension for commercial vehicles and buses
GRVA-07-28 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
Proposal to amend the proposal from Germany regarding lane-change functionality:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 5.2.1. – lane keeping</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.1. - risk to safety of the vehicle occupants and other road users</li><li>paragraphs 5.2.6.2. and 5.2.6.3. – preconditions for a lane change procedure</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.5. – timing of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.6. and its sub-paragraphs – criticality of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 7.1.3. – rear detection range</li><li>Annex 5. – test cases for rear detection range, lane change.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-30 | UN R157: Proposal for editorial corrections
The proposal aims to correct 5 types of inconsistencies:<ol class="alpha"><li>The reference to Annex 4 is repeated in each sub-paragraph and should instead be stated once in each paragraph. </li><li>Acronyms are used inconsistently. Proposal to use them consistently throughout similar to UN-R79, e.g. Emergency Manoeuvre (EM), and when used in the text as “emergency manoeuvre”</li><li>Each sub-paragraph has a heading, this helps understand the structure and should be carried over to par. 8.1., 9.1. and 9.2. as well, the wording for the heading of par. 9.1. and 9.2. are derived from UN-R155 and UN-R156 respectively.</li><li>Consistent use of term throughout, e.g. R<sub>157</sub>SWIN without blank, Cyber Security as two words as used in UN-R155</li><li>Editorial corrections, e.g. missing paragraph numbers, missing full stop in the paragraph number.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-30 | UN R157: Proposal for editorial corrections
The proposal aims to correct 5 types of inconsistencies:<ol class="alpha"><li>The reference to Annex 4 is repeated in each sub-paragraph and should instead be stated once in each paragraph. </li><li>Acronyms are used inconsistently. Proposal to use them consistently throughout similar to UN-R79, e.g. Emergency Manoeuvre (EM), and when used in the text as “emergency manoeuvre”</li><li>Each sub-paragraph has a heading, this helps understand the structure and should be carried over to par. 8.1., 9.1. and 9.2. as well, the wording for the heading of par. 9.1. and 9.2. are derived from UN-R155 and UN-R156 respectively.</li><li>Consistent use of term throughout, e.g. R<sub>157</sub>SWIN without blank, Cyber Security as two words as used in UN-R155</li><li>Editorial corrections, e.g. missing paragraph numbers, missing full stop in the paragraph number.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-31 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments - Scope extension
Proposal to include all vehicle categories M and N in the scope of UN R157.
GRVA-07-31 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments - Scope extension
Proposal to include all vehicle categories M and N in the scope of UN R157.
GRVA-07-39 | UN R157: Request for interpretation regarding approaching emergency vehicles
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-63 | UN R157: Supporting presentation concerning amendments on speed range and lane-change functionality
|
GRVA/2020/32 | ALKS: Proposal for amendment
Proposal to amend the ALKS UN Regulation provisions to enable approval of systems operating at speeds up to 130 km/h.
GRVA/2020/33 | ALKS: Proposal for an amendment
Proposal to introduce additional requirements for a lane change functionality.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
GRVA-07-07 | UN R157: Gaps identified in the regulation
Presentation raising concerns over discrepancies and risks of misinterpretation in the application of the regulation by technical services.
GRVA-07-21 | UN R157: Proposal for clarifications
Proposal to clarify the text with regard to:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 2.6., Definition of an imminent collision</li><li>paragraphs 5.1.9 and 7.1.4., Lifetime of the system</li><li>paragraph 5.2.3.3., Traffic Rules and Safety Distance to the front</li><li>paragraph 5.2.5.2. – “anticipated TTC” in cut-in scenario</li><li>paragraph 6.2.5.1., Deactivation by input to driving controls</li><li>paragraph 6.2.6., Transition to assisted driving</li><li>paragraph 6.4.4., Examples of information to the driver</li><li>Annex 5 – Tests<ul><li>Section 5.1. contains physical tests that have to be performed at the time of type approval</li><li>Section 5.2. aims to confirm at the time of type approval, that the system complies with the corresponding provisions of the main text. This confirmation shall be done by at least one physical test per provision, if possible due to the nature of the provision, and may be supported by further evidence.</li><li>Section 5.3. is a collection of additional scenarios, that the ALKS could encounter. Whether they are relevant to the ALKS depends on its ODD. So either the manufacturer explains why his system will not need to handle these scenarios, or has to explain the behaviour of the ALKS. </li><li>larify the content of par. 5.2. by rewording the provisions similar to that of the core text.</li></ul></li></ol>
GRVA-07-26 | UN R157: Scope extension for commercial vehicles and buses
GRVA-07-27 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/32
Proposal to address risks related to activities other than driving and to clarify that a declaration of a maximum operational speed that exceeds 60 km/h is possible, but not required.
GRVA-07-28 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
Proposal to amend the proposal from Germany regarding lane-change functionality:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 5.2.1. – lane keeping</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.1. - risk to safety of the vehicle occupants and other road users</li><li>paragraphs 5.2.6.2. and 5.2.6.3. – preconditions for a lane change procedure</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.5. – timing of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 5.2.6.6. and its sub-paragraphs – criticality of a lane change maneuver</li><li>paragraph 7.1.3. – rear detection range</li><li>Annex 5. – test cases for rear detection range, lane change.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-30 | UN R157: Proposal for editorial corrections
The proposal aims to correct 5 types of inconsistencies:<ol class="alpha"><li>The reference to Annex 4 is repeated in each sub-paragraph and should instead be stated once in each paragraph. </li><li>Acronyms are used inconsistently. Proposal to use them consistently throughout similar to UN-R79, e.g. Emergency Manoeuvre (EM), and when used in the text as “emergency manoeuvre”</li><li>Each sub-paragraph has a heading, this helps understand the structure and should be carried over to par. 8.1., 9.1. and 9.2. as well, the wording for the heading of par. 9.1. and 9.2. are derived from UN-R155 and UN-R156 respectively.</li><li>Consistent use of term throughout, e.g. R<sub>157</sub>SWIN without blank, Cyber Security as two words as used in UN-R155</li><li>Editorial corrections, e.g. missing paragraph numbers, missing full stop in the paragraph number.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-31 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments - Scope extension
Proposal to include all vehicle categories M and N in the scope of UN R157.
GRVA-07-39 | UN R157: Request for interpretation regarding approaching emergency vehicles
GRVA-07-45 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-56 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to documents GRVA/2020/32 and GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-59 | UN R157: Comments on document GRVA-07-06
GRVA-07-62 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-63 | UN R157: Supporting presentation concerning amendments on speed range and lane-change functionality
GRVA-07-66 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-69/Rev.1 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
This document was produced during an informal meeting (on 23 September 2020) of interested experts who reviewed the ALKS-related documents presented at GRVA on 24 September 2020.
GRVA-07-21 | UN R157: Proposal for clarifications
Proposal to clarify the text with regard to:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 2.6., Definition of an imminent collision</li><li>paragraphs 5.1.9 and 7.1.4., Lifetime of the system</li><li>paragraph 5.2.3.3., Traffic Rules and Safety Distance to the front</li><li>paragraph 5.2.5.2. – “anticipated TTC” in cut-in scenario</li><li>paragraph 6.2.5.1., Deactivation by input to driving controls</li><li>paragraph 6.2.6., Transition to assisted driving</li><li>paragraph 6.4.4., Examples of information to the driver</li><li>Annex 5 – Tests<ul><li>Section 5.1. contains physical tests that have to be performed at the time of type approval</li><li>Section 5.2. aims to confirm at the time of type approval, that the system complies with the corresponding provisions of the main text. This confirmation shall be done by at least one physical test per provision, if possible due to the nature of the provision, and may be supported by further evidence.</li><li>Section 5.3. is a collection of additional scenarios, that the ALKS could encounter. Whether they are relevant to the ALKS depends on its ODD. So either the manufacturer explains why his system will not need to handle these scenarios, or has to explain the behaviour of the ALKS. </li><li>larify the content of par. 5.2. by rewording the provisions similar to that of the core text.</li></ul></li></ol>
GRVA-07-26 | UN R157: Scope extension for commercial vehicles and buses
GRVA-07-69/Rev.1 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
This document was produced during an informal meeting (on 23 September 2020) of interested experts who reviewed the ALKS-related documents presented at GRVA on 24 September 2020.
GRVA-07-69/Rev.1 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
This document was produced during an informal meeting (on 23 September 2020) of interested experts who reviewed the ALKS-related documents presented at GRVA on 24 September 2020.
GRVA-07-37 | Proposal for amendments to UN R156 and UN R157
Under the initial ALKS regulation and its reference to the new cyber security requlation, manufacturers are permitted to use an alternative software identification system instead of the proposed RxSWIN format. This proposal seeks to clarify the use of such alternative identifications in the approval process.
GRVA-07-76 | GRVA: List of decisions taken during the 7th (September 2020) session under the silence procedure
GRVA-07-66 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/33
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-06 | UN R157: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to improve the text with editorial clarifications and restructuring.
|
|
| 5. | Connected vehicles |
GRVA may wish to receive a status report from the informal working group on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates.
GRVA-07-49 | Status report of the Cyber Security and Software Updates informal working group
|
GRVA-07-49 | Status report of the Cyber Security and Software Updates informal working group
|
|
| 5. (a) | Cyber security and data protection |
GRVA may wish to be briefed on the outcome of the recent meeting(s) of the IWG on Cybersecurity and Over-the-Air issues.
GRVA-07-04/Rev.1 | UN R155: Proposal for a cybersecurity regulation Interpretation Document
CS/OTA informal group proposal for a document to assist with the implementation of the new UN Regulation on cybersecurity management. This document is also available with track changes in a <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.docx" target="_blank">word document format</a> and <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.pdf" target="_blank">portable document format</a>.
GRVA-07-08 | UN R155: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting a cybersecurity management approval in the absence of agreement on the common interpretation of a provision where the interpretation of the Approval Authority has raised comments from other authorities under the review procedure provided for in paragraph 5.3.4.
GRVA may wish to review the text of the footnotes 3 and 6 in the UN Regulation on Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management Systems.
GRVA-07-04/Rev.1 | UN R155: Proposal for a cybersecurity regulation Interpretation Document
CS/OTA informal group proposal for a document to assist with the implementation of the new UN Regulation on cybersecurity management. This document is also available with track changes in a <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.docx" target="_blank">word document format</a> and <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.pdf" target="_blank">portable document format</a>.
GRVA-07-08 | UN R155: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting a cybersecurity management approval in the absence of agreement on the common interpretation of a provision where the interpretation of the Approval Authority has raised comments from other authorities under the review procedure provided for in paragraph 5.3.4.
WP.29/2020/94 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/79
Proposal for provisions regarding the extension, expiration, or withdrawal of a cybersecurity approval.
GRVA may wish to review a proposal for an interpretation document regarding the UN Regulation on Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management System, if any.
GRVA-07-04/Rev.1 | UN R155: Proposal for a cybersecurity regulation Interpretation Document
CS/OTA informal group proposal for a document to assist with the implementation of the new UN Regulation on cybersecurity management. This document is also available with track changes in a <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.docx" target="_blank">word document format</a> and <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.pdf" target="_blank">portable document format</a>.
GRVA-07-04/Rev.1 | UN R155: Proposal for a cybersecurity regulation Interpretation Document
CS/OTA informal group proposal for a document to assist with the implementation of the new UN Regulation on cybersecurity management. This document is also available with track changes in a <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.docx" target="_blank">word document format</a> and <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.pdf" target="_blank">portable document format</a>.
GRVA-07-08 | UN R155: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting a cybersecurity management approval in the absence of agreement on the common interpretation of a provision where the interpretation of the Approval Authority has raised comments from other authorities under the review procedure provided for in paragraph 5.3.4.
GRVA may wish to review a draft set of technical requirements relevant for the 1998 Agreement Contracting Parties, if any.
GRVA-07-04/Rev.1 | UN R155: Proposal for a cybersecurity regulation Interpretation Document
CS/OTA informal group proposal for a document to assist with the implementation of the new UN Regulation on cybersecurity management. This document is also available with track changes in a <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.docx" target="_blank">word document format</a> and <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.pdf" target="_blank">portable document format</a>.
GRVA-07-08 | UN R155: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting a cybersecurity management approval in the absence of agreement on the common interpretation of a provision where the interpretation of the Approval Authority has raised comments from other authorities under the review procedure provided for in paragraph 5.3.4.
GRVA may wish to consider any other proposals regarding UN R155.
GRVA-07-04/Rev.1 | UN R155: Proposal for a cybersecurity regulation Interpretation Document
CS/OTA informal group proposal for a document to assist with the implementation of the new UN Regulation on cybersecurity management. This document is also available with track changes in a <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.docx" target="_blank">word document format</a> and <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.pdf" target="_blank">portable document format</a>.
GRVA-07-08 | UN R155: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting a cybersecurity management approval in the absence of agreement on the common interpretation of a provision where the interpretation of the Approval Authority has raised comments from other authorities under the review procedure provided for in paragraph 5.3.4.
GRVA-07-08 | UN R155: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting a cybersecurity management approval in the absence of agreement on the common interpretation of a provision where the interpretation of the Approval Authority has raised comments from other authorities under the review procedure provided for in paragraph 5.3.4.
GRVA-07-25 | UN R155: Guidelines on the use of DETA
GRVA-07-36 | Cybersecurity: Comments on WP.29-181-10
GRVA-07-41 | Protection profile for automated and connected vehicles
|
GRVA-07-04/Rev.1 | UN R155: Proposal for a cybersecurity regulation Interpretation Document
CS/OTA informal group proposal for a document to assist with the implementation of the new UN Regulation on cybersecurity management. This document is also available with track changes in a <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.docx" target="_blank">word document format</a> and <a href="https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2020/wp29grva/GRVA-07-04r1e-changes.pdf" target="_blank">portable document format</a>.
GRVA-07-08 | UN R155: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the Approval Authority should postpone granting a cybersecurity management approval in the absence of agreement on the common interpretation of a provision where the interpretation of the Approval Authority has raised comments from other authorities under the review procedure provided for in paragraph 5.3.4.
GRVA-07-36 | Cybersecurity: Comments on WP.29-181-10
GRVA-07-41 | Protection profile for automated and connected vehicles
GRVA-07-25 | UN R155: Guidelines on the use of DETA
GRVA-07-36 | Cybersecurity: Comments on WP.29-181-10
GRVA-07-76 | GRVA: List of decisions taken during the 7th (September 2020) session under the silence procedure
GRVA-07-36 | Cybersecurity: Comments on WP.29-181-10
GRVA-07-49 | Status report of the Cyber Security and Software Updates informal working group
|
|
| 5. (b) | Software updates and Over-the-Air issues |
GRVA may wish to review a proposal for an interpretation document regarding the UN Regulation on Software Updates and Software Updates Management System.
GRVA-07-37 | Proposal for amendments to UN R156 and UN R157
Under the initial ALKS regulation and its reference to the new cyber security requlation, manufacturers are permitted to use an alternative software identification system instead of the proposed RxSWIN format. This proposal seeks to clarify the use of such alternative identifications in the approval process.
GRVA-07-44 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29
Proposal to ensure that the information provided regarding software updates is accessible for use in type approval, conformity of production, market surveillance, recalls and Periodic Technical Inspection (PTI).
GRVA-07-44 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29
Proposal to ensure that the information provided regarding software updates is accessible for use in type approval, conformity of production, market surveillance, recalls and Periodic Technical Inspection (PTI).
GRVA-07-44 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29
Proposal to ensure that the information provided regarding software updates is accessible for use in type approval, conformity of production, market surveillance, recalls and Periodic Technical Inspection (PTI).
GRVA-07-44 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29
Proposal to ensure that the information provided regarding software updates is accessible for use in type approval, conformity of production, market surveillance, recalls and Periodic Technical Inspection (PTI).
GRVA-07-50 | RE3: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2020/29 (tracked version)
Proposal to clarify the explanation of the requirements of paragraph 7 and Annex 1 of the UN R156 (software updates and software updates management systems) and provide information on what may be used to evidence those requirements.
GRVA-07-50 | RE3: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2020/29 (tracked version)
Proposal to clarify the explanation of the requirements of paragraph 7 and Annex 1 of the UN R156 (software updates and software updates management systems) and provide information on what may be used to evidence those requirements.
GRVA-07-51 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29 (clean version)
Proposal to clarify the explanation of the requirements of paragraph 7 and Annex 1 of the UN R156 (software updates and software updates management systems) and provide information on what may be used to evidence those requirements.
GRVA/2020/29 | RE3: Proposal to add a section on the interpretation of the UN Regulation on Software Updates
The purpose of this document is to help clarify the requirements of paragraph 7 and Annex 1 of the UN Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software updates management system (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/80) and provide information on what may be used to evidence those requirements.
GRVA may wish to consider additional proposals regarding UN R156.
GRVA-07-37 | Proposal for amendments to UN R156 and UN R157
Under the initial ALKS regulation and its reference to the new cyber security requlation, manufacturers are permitted to use an alternative software identification system instead of the proposed RxSWIN format. This proposal seeks to clarify the use of such alternative identifications in the approval process.
GRVA-07-37 | Proposal for amendments to UN R156 and UN R157
Under the initial ALKS regulation and its reference to the new cyber security requlation, manufacturers are permitted to use an alternative software identification system instead of the proposed RxSWIN format. This proposal seeks to clarify the use of such alternative identifications in the approval process.
GRVA-07-44 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29
Proposal to ensure that the information provided regarding software updates is accessible for use in type approval, conformity of production, market surveillance, recalls and Periodic Technical Inspection (PTI).
GRVA-07-44 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29
Proposal to ensure that the information provided regarding software updates is accessible for use in type approval, conformity of production, market surveillance, recalls and Periodic Technical Inspection (PTI).
GRVA-07-50 | RE3: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2020/29 (tracked version)
Proposal to clarify the explanation of the requirements of paragraph 7 and Annex 1 of the UN R156 (software updates and software updates management systems) and provide information on what may be used to evidence those requirements.
|
GRVA-07-37 | Proposal for amendments to UN R156 and UN R157
Under the initial ALKS regulation and its reference to the new cyber security requlation, manufacturers are permitted to use an alternative software identification system instead of the proposed RxSWIN format. This proposal seeks to clarify the use of such alternative identifications in the approval process.
GRVA-07-51 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29 (clean version)
Proposal to clarify the explanation of the requirements of paragraph 7 and Annex 1 of the UN R156 (software updates and software updates management systems) and provide information on what may be used to evidence those requirements.
GRVA-07-50 | RE3: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2020/29 (tracked version)
Proposal to clarify the explanation of the requirements of paragraph 7 and Annex 1 of the UN R156 (software updates and software updates management systems) and provide information on what may be used to evidence those requirements.
GRVA-07-44 | RE3: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/29
Proposal to ensure that the information provided regarding software updates is accessible for use in type approval, conformity of production, market surveillance, recalls and Periodic Technical Inspection (PTI).
GRVA-07-76 | GRVA: List of decisions taken during the 7th (September 2020) session under the silence procedure
GRVA/2020/29 | RE3: Proposal to add a section on the interpretation of the UN Regulation on Software Updates
The purpose of this document is to help clarify the requirements of paragraph 7 and Annex 1 of the UN Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software updates management system (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2020/80) and provide information on what may be used to evidence those requirements.
GRVA-07-49 | Status report of the Cyber Security and Software Updates informal working group
|
|
| 5. (c) | Legal considerations regarding technical provisions over the vehicle lifetime |
GRVA may wish to be informed by the secretariat about the discussion at WP.29 in March 2020 concerning the legal basis to draft lifecycle and lifetime related provisions under the 1958 Agreement. |
||
| 5. (d) | Other business |
GRVA may wish to consider any other proposal, if available. |
||
| 6. | UN Regulation No. 79 (Steering equipment) | |||
| 6. (a) | Automatically Commanded Steering Function |
GRVA agreed to review two proposals for amendments to the provisions applicable to Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF) of Category C, tabled by the experts from the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA).
GRVA-07-16 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22.
GRVA-07-16 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22.
GRVA-07-17 | UN R79: Alternative to the actuation of the remote control device for the use of RCP
Proposal for an alternative to ensure user attentiveness when activating a remote-controlled parking system.
GRVA-07-18 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2020/22
GRVA-07-19 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2020/22
Proposal to modify the following elements:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 5.6.4.2.3., delete “temporarily”</li><li>paragraph 5.6.4.5.2.1., replace “actually” by “anticipated to be”</li><li>paragraph 5.6.4.6.6., B1 shall resume “in a timely manner”</li><li>paragraph 5.6.4.6.8.1., clarify the suppression criteria</li><li>paragraph 5.6.4.7., define distance tolerances for lane-change critical distances</li><li>Annex 8, Paragraph 2., Carry over the language already adopted for ACSF B1: “At the manufacturer's discretion and with the agreement of the Technical Service, a lane with a width of less than 3.5 m may be used, if the correct function of the system on roads with wider lanes can be demonstrated.” and allow for lower temperature and wet surface test conditions, and<li>Annex 8, Paragraph 3.5.1.2. (j), amend the pass condition with regard to direction indicator deactivation.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-20 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22
Consolidated proposal incorporating comments from OICA/CLEPA, CITA, Germany, and AVERE (including most recent proposal to the 7th GRVA session).
GRVA-07-20 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22
Consolidated proposal incorporating comments from OICA/CLEPA, CITA, Germany, and AVERE (including most recent proposal to the 7th GRVA session).
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-42 | UN R79: How to proceed with ADAS and continuous automation up to Level 2?
GRVA/2020/22 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal for provisions concerning:<ol class="alpha"><li>B1 lane centering</li><li>ACSF activation conditions</li><li>Driver override</li><li>Clarification of ACSF standby-mode</li><li>Clarification of “ready-to-intervene"</li><li>Indication to the driver in case of suppression</li><li>Clarification of suppression criteria</li><li>Sensor test before activation.</li></ol>
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
GRVA may wish to consider a document submitted by the expert from Germany proposing amendments to paragraph 5.6.4.7. allowing to consider additional influencing parameters when identifying the critical situation (e.g. acceleration of the ego-vehicle and/or deceleration of the approaching vehicle) and therefore, when calculating the value of scritical.
GRVA-07-20 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22
Consolidated proposal incorporating comments from OICA/CLEPA, CITA, Germany, and AVERE (including most recent proposal to the 7th GRVA session).
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-42 | UN R79: How to proceed with ADAS and continuous automation up to Level 2?
GRVA/2020/24 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to permit the manufacturer to specify its own formula for the calculation of s<sub>critical</sub>. The current formula does not take the dynamic behaviour of vehicles into account and therefore requires gaps that under some traffic conditions don’t usually occur. Since there are different ways of addressing the dynamic behaviour of the vehicles with regard to the original formula, this proposal would allow the manufacturer to specify its own formula provided the safety principle is maintained.
GRVA may wish to perform a general review of the ACSF provisions.
GRVA-07-15 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments
This proposal revises the changes proposed in document GRVA/2020/7 based on stakeholder feedback. The proposal introduces provisions for M<sub>1</sub> vehicle to allow for lateral accelerations up to 40% greater than the 3 m/s<sup>2</sup> limitation for a period up to two seconds in order to in order navigate unexpected changes in the radius of the curvature of a bend and avoid driving behaviour that may be unexpected and/or confusing to the operator and following vehicles.
GRVA-07-20 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22
Consolidated proposal incorporating comments from OICA/CLEPA, CITA, Germany, and AVERE (including most recent proposal to the 7th GRVA session).
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-42 | UN R79: How to proceed with ADAS and continuous automation up to Level 2?
GRVA may wish to review provisions for an alternative Human-Machine Interface (HMI) to control the Remote-Control Parking function, if any.
GRVA-07-17 | UN R79: Alternative to the actuation of the remote control device for the use of RCP
Proposal for an alternative to ensure user attentiveness when activating a remote-controlled parking system.
GRVA-07-20 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22
Consolidated proposal incorporating comments from OICA/CLEPA, CITA, Germany, and AVERE (including most recent proposal to the 7th GRVA session).
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-42 | UN R79: How to proceed with ADAS and continuous automation up to Level 2?
GRVA may wish to consider additional submissions concerning UN R79 and ACSF.
GRVA-07-20 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22
Consolidated proposal incorporating comments from OICA/CLEPA, CITA, Germany, and AVERE (including most recent proposal to the 7th GRVA session).
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-42 | UN R79: How to proceed with ADAS and continuous automation up to Level 2?
GRVA-07-42 | UN R79: How to proceed with ADAS and continuous automation up to Level 2?
GRVA-07-43 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments (ACSF Category C and truck-trailer data transmission)
|
GRVA/2020/22 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal for provisions concerning:<ol class="alpha"><li>B1 lane centering</li><li>ACSF activation conditions</li><li>Driver override</li><li>Clarification of ACSF standby-mode</li><li>Clarification of “ready-to-intervene"</li><li>Indication to the driver in case of suppression</li><li>Clarification of suppression criteria</li><li>Sensor test before activation.</li></ol>
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
GRVA/2020/24 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to permit the manufacturer to specify its own formula for the calculation of s<sub>critical</sub>. The current formula does not take the dynamic behaviour of vehicles into account and therefore requires gaps that under some traffic conditions don’t usually occur. Since there are different ways of addressing the dynamic behaviour of the vehicles with regard to the original formula, this proposal would allow the manufacturer to specify its own formula provided the safety principle is maintained.
GRVA-07-15 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments
This proposal revises the changes proposed in document GRVA/2020/7 based on stakeholder feedback. The proposal introduces provisions for M<sub>1</sub> vehicle to allow for lateral accelerations up to 40% greater than the 3 m/s<sup>2</sup> limitation for a period up to two seconds in order to in order navigate unexpected changes in the radius of the curvature of a bend and avoid driving behaviour that may be unexpected and/or confusing to the operator and following vehicles.
GRVA-07-16 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22.
GRVA-07-17 | UN R79: Alternative to the actuation of the remote control device for the use of RCP
Proposal for an alternative to ensure user attentiveness when activating a remote-controlled parking system.
GRVA-07-18 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2020/22
GRVA-07-19 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2020/22
Proposal to modify the following elements:<ol class="alpha"><li>paragraph 5.6.4.2.3., delete “temporarily”</li><li>paragraph 5.6.4.5.2.1., replace “actually” by “anticipated to be”</li><li>paragraph 5.6.4.6.6., B1 shall resume “in a timely manner”</li><li>paragraph 5.6.4.6.8.1., clarify the suppression criteria</li><li>paragraph 5.6.4.7., define distance tolerances for lane-change critical distances</li><li>Annex 8, Paragraph 2., Carry over the language already adopted for ACSF B1: “At the manufacturer's discretion and with the agreement of the Technical Service, a lane with a width of less than 3.5 m may be used, if the correct function of the system on roads with wider lanes can be demonstrated.” and allow for lower temperature and wet surface test conditions, and<li>Annex 8, Paragraph 3.5.1.2. (j), amend the pass condition with regard to direction indicator deactivation.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-20 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22
Consolidated proposal incorporating comments from OICA/CLEPA, CITA, Germany, and AVERE (including most recent proposal to the 7th GRVA session).
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA-07-32 | UN R157: Proposal for amendments
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded.
GRVA-07-42 | UN R79: How to proceed with ADAS and continuous automation up to Level 2?
GRVA-07-43 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments (ACSF Category C and truck-trailer data transmission)
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
GRVA-07-76 | GRVA: List of decisions taken during the 7th (September 2020) session under the silence procedure
GRVA-07-43 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments (ACSF Category C and truck-trailer data transmission)
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA/2020/22 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal for provisions concerning:<ol class="alpha"><li>B1 lane centering</li><li>ACSF activation conditions</li><li>Driver override</li><li>Clarification of ACSF standby-mode</li><li>Clarification of “ready-to-intervene"</li><li>Indication to the driver in case of suppression</li><li>Clarification of suppression criteria</li><li>Sensor test before activation.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-24 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to the 03 series of amendments-ESF
Proposal to permit manoeuvring assistance in defined low speed driving situations to reduce damages and injuries.
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
|
|
| 6. (b) | Steering equipment |
GRVA agreed to resume consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/16 inserting provisions for a new category of Emergency Steering Function (ESF) aimed to allow for the type approval of emergency assistance systems (e.g. in case of driver’s health problem).
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA-07-24 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to the 03 series of amendments-ESF
Proposal to permit manoeuvring assistance in defined low speed driving situations to reduce damages and injuries.
GRVA/2020/16 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to permit a function to cope with temporary driver inability to control the vehicle (e.g. caused by a health problem). The proposed emergency steering function of type <notextile>(c)</notextile> would warn and possibly revive the driver while automatically performing emergency lane change(s) with the aim to bring the vehicle to a standstill in an area with a low risk of collision (“target stop area” e.g. hard shoulder).
GRVA may wish to review any proposal submitted under this agenda item, if any.
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
|
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA-07-24 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to the 03 series of amendments-ESF
Proposal to permit manoeuvring assistance in defined low speed driving situations to reduce damages and injuries.
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
GRVA-07-43 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments (ACSF Category C and truck-trailer data transmission)
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
GRVA-07-24 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to the 03 series of amendments-ESF
Proposal to permit manoeuvring assistance in defined low speed driving situations to reduce damages and injuries.
|
|
| 6. (c) | Remote Control Manoeuvring |
GRVA may wish to review any proposal submitted under this agenda item, if any. |
GRVA-07-43 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments (ACSF Category C and truck-trailer data transmission)
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA/2020/22 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal for provisions concerning:<ol class="alpha"><li>B1 lane centering</li><li>ACSF activation conditions</li><li>Driver override</li><li>Clarification of ACSF standby-mode</li><li>Clarification of “ready-to-intervene"</li><li>Indication to the driver in case of suppression</li><li>Clarification of suppression criteria</li><li>Sensor test before activation.</li></ol>
|
|
| 6. (d) | Other business concerning UN R79 |
GRVA may wish to consider any other proposal, if available.
GRVA-07-23 | UN R79: "Hands off" lane-keeping assist systems
GRVA-07-23 | UN R79: "Hands off" lane-keeping assist systems
GRVA-07-23 | UN R79: "Hands off" lane-keeping assist systems
GRVA-07-23 | UN R79: "Hands off" lane-keeping assist systems
|
GRVA-07-23 | UN R79: "Hands off" lane-keeping assist systems
GRVA-07-29 | UN R79: Proposal for clarifications of ACSF Cat B1 provisions
The intention of the proposed amendment is to clarify the existing text on continued support of an ACSF B1 if the boundary conditions are exceeded. It clarifies that under certain circumstances, e.g. if there are no lane markings present or if the vehicle has already drifted substantially out of the lane such that the lane may no longer be recognized, a continuation of support may no longer be possible or reasonable.
GRVA/2020/22 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal for provisions concerning:<ol class="alpha"><li>B1 lane centering</li><li>ACSF activation conditions</li><li>Driver override</li><li>Clarification of ACSF standby-mode</li><li>Clarification of “ready-to-intervene"</li><li>Indication to the driver in case of suppression</li><li>Clarification of suppression criteria</li><li>Sensor test before activation.</li></ol>
GRVA-07-24 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to the 03 series of amendments-ESF
Proposal to permit manoeuvring assistance in defined low speed driving situations to reduce damages and injuries.
GRVA-07-22 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments - Emergency assist / RMF
This document proposes a new 04 series of amendments to Regulation 79 with regard to a system that aims at bringing the vehicle to a safe stop in case of driver unavailability, defining a "risk mitigation function".
GRVA-07-43 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments (ACSF Category C and truck-trailer data transmission)
GRVA-07-17 | UN R79: Alternative to the actuation of the remote control device for the use of RCP
Proposal for an alternative to ensure user attentiveness when activating a remote-controlled parking system.
GRVA-07-20 | UN R79: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/22
Consolidated proposal incorporating comments from OICA/CLEPA, CITA, Germany, and AVERE (including most recent proposal to the 7th GRVA session).
GRVA/2020/23 | UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Annex 8 (Test requirements for Corrective and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF)), paragraph 3.5. (Tests for ACSF of Category C) in order to clarify that enabling of the system as part of the test procedure is only necessary when the system is not yet enabled.
|
|
| 7. | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems |
GRVA agreed to review amendments proposal(s) to UN Regulation No. 152 tabled by the IWG on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS).
GRVA-07-09 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/26 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-09 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/26 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-10 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/27 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-11 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/35 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-40 | UN R131: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA-07-03
Japan supports the proposal from Germany (GRVA-07-03) to establish an informal working group to develop requirements for heavy-duty vehicle VRU AEBS. Japan proposes to adapt provisions from UN R152 on light vehicle AEBS.
GRVA-07-53 | UN R152: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/35
Proposals for improvements and clarifications to the text of UN R152 from the AEBS informal working group.
GRVA-07-53 | UN R152: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/35
Proposals for improvements and clarifications to the text of UN R152 from the AEBS informal working group.
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-72 | UN R152: Recommended implementation of new requirements
GRVA-07-72 | UN R152: Recommended implementation of new requirements
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/27 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario in a single step approach. (Alternatively, the IWG has prepared proposals for a two-step approach to introducing the new requirements. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/35 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/35 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/35 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA agreed to review a document tabled by the expert from OICA, proposing amendments to the Electronic Stability Control deactivation provisions affecting AEBS.
GRVA-07-09 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/26 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-40 | UN R131: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA-07-03
Japan supports the proposal from Germany (GRVA-07-03) to establish an informal working group to develop requirements for heavy-duty vehicle VRU AEBS. Japan proposes to adapt provisions from UN R152 on light vehicle AEBS.
GRVA-07-53 | UN R152: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/35
Proposals for improvements and clarifications to the text of UN R152 from the AEBS informal working group.
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-72 | UN R152: Recommended implementation of new requirements
GRVA/2020/25 | UN R152: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the AEBS may be automatically deactivated in the event that the electronic stability control system is deactivated.
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/35 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA may wish to review further proposals for amendments to the draft UN Regulation on AEBS for M1 and N1 vehicles, if any.
GRVA-07-09 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/26 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-40 | UN R131: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA-07-03
Japan supports the proposal from Germany (GRVA-07-03) to establish an informal working group to develop requirements for heavy-duty vehicle VRU AEBS. Japan proposes to adapt provisions from UN R152 on light vehicle AEBS.
GRVA-07-53 | UN R152: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/35
Proposals for improvements and clarifications to the text of UN R152 from the AEBS informal working group.
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-72 | UN R152: Recommended implementation of new requirements
GRVA-07-72 | UN R152: Recommended implementation of new requirements
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/35 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/35 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA may wish to consider additional proposals regarding AEBS.
GRVA-07-03 | Proposal for a new informal working group on AEBS for heavy-duty vehicles
GRVA-07-09 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/26 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-38 | Presentation on virtual testing for motor vehicle performance validation
GRVA-07-40 | UN R131: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA-07-03
Japan supports the proposal from Germany (GRVA-07-03) to establish an informal working group to develop requirements for heavy-duty vehicle VRU AEBS. Japan proposes to adapt provisions from UN R152 on light vehicle AEBS.
GRVA-07-40 | UN R131: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA-07-03
Japan supports the proposal from Germany (GRVA-07-03) to establish an informal working group to develop requirements for heavy-duty vehicle VRU AEBS. Japan proposes to adapt provisions from UN R152 on light vehicle AEBS.
GRVA-07-53 | UN R152: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/35
Proposals for improvements and clarifications to the text of UN R152 from the AEBS informal working group.
GRVA-07-53 | UN R152: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/35
Proposals for improvements and clarifications to the text of UN R152 from the AEBS informal working group.
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-72 | UN R152: Recommended implementation of new requirements
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/35 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
|
GRVA/2020/26 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.
GRVA/2020/27 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario in a single step approach. (Alternatively, the IWG has prepared proposals for a two-step approach to introducing the new requirements. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/28 | UN R152: Proposal for a 02 series of amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/35 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series amendments
Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)
GRVA/2020/25 | UN R152: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to clarify that the AEBS may be automatically deactivated in the event that the electronic stability control system is deactivated.
GRVA-07-03 | Proposal for a new informal working group on AEBS for heavy-duty vehicles
GRVA-07-09 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 3
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/26 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-10 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/27 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-11 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/35 to improve the text on a number of issues.
GRVA-07-12 | UN R152: Justification for 2 Step Approach for AEBS Car to Bicycle test introduction
GRVA-07-40 | UN R131: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA-07-03
Japan supports the proposal from Germany (GRVA-07-03) to establish an informal working group to develop requirements for heavy-duty vehicle VRU AEBS. Japan proposes to adapt provisions from UN R152 on light vehicle AEBS.
GRVA-07-53 | UN R152: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/35
Proposals for improvements and clarifications to the text of UN R152 from the AEBS informal working group.
GRVA-07-70 | UN R152: Presentation of the proposals submitted by the IWG on AEBS
GRVA-07-72 | UN R152: Recommended implementation of new requirements
|
|
| 8. | UN Regulations Nos. 13, 13-H, 139, 140 and UN GTR No. 8 |
GRVA may wish to consider proposals to introduce requirements for endurance braking systems for vehicles equipped with an electric regenerative endurance braking system.
GRVA-07-05 | UN R13: Comments on proposal GRVA/2020/36
GRVA-07-05 | UN R13: Comments on proposal GRVA/2020/36
GRVA-07-05 | UN R13: Comments on proposal GRVA/2020/36
GRVA/2020/36 | UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to introduce requirements for endurance braking systems for vehicles equipped with an electric regenerative endurance braking system. This proposal is an alternative to the text proposed in document GRVA/2020/37.
GRVA/2020/36 | UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to introduce requirements for endurance braking systems for vehicles equipped with an electric regenerative endurance braking system. This proposal is an alternative to the text proposed in document GRVA/2020/37.
GRVA/2020/37 | UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to introduce requirements for endurance braking systems for vehicles equipped with an electric regenerative endurance braking system.
|
GRVA/2020/36 | UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to introduce requirements for endurance braking systems for vehicles equipped with an electric regenerative endurance braking system. This proposal is an alternative to the text proposed in document GRVA/2020/37.
GRVA/2020/37 | UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to introduce requirements for endurance braking systems for vehicles equipped with an electric regenerative endurance braking system.
GRVA-07-05 | UN R13: Comments on proposal GRVA/2020/36
|
|
| 8. (a) | Electronic Stability Control |
GRVA agreed to resume consideration on the proposal to amend UN Global Technical Regulation (UN GTR) No. 8, aimed at introducing the testing provisions to accommodate the latest innovations for steering systems.
GRVA-07-64 | GTR 8: Proposal for an amendment to document GRVA/2020/34
GRVA-07-64 | GTR 8: Proposal for an amendment to document GRVA/2020/34
GRVA/2020/34 | GTR 8: Proposal for Amendment 1
Proposal to introduce provisions for recently developed steering systems that have significantly lower steering gear ratios (i.e. quick steering characteristics).
|
GRVA/2020/34 | GTR 8: Proposal for Amendment 1
Proposal to introduce provisions for recently developed steering systems that have significantly lower steering gear ratios (i.e. quick steering characteristics).
GRVA-07-64 | GTR 8: Proposal for an amendment to document GRVA/2020/34
|
|
| 8. (b) | Modular Vehicle Combinations |
GRVA agreed to review a proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 13 with provisions relevant for Modular Vehicle Combinations (MVC), tabled by the expert from OICA.
GRVA-07-35 | ISO 11992-1:2019 Road vehicles — Interchange of digital information on electrical connections between towing and towed vehicles
This document is password protected. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.
GRVA-07-35 | ISO 11992-1:2019 Road vehicles — Interchange of digital information on electrical connections between towing and towed vehicles
This document is password protected. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.
GRVA-07-71 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/30 (Modular vehicle combinations)
GRVA-07-71 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/30 (Modular vehicle combinations)
GRVA/2020/30 | UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to introduce provisions for approving single vehicles involved in modular vehicle combinations, e.g. towing trailers, “road trains”.
GRVA/2020/30 | UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to introduce provisions for approving single vehicles involved in modular vehicle combinations, e.g. towing trailers, “road trains”.
|
GRVA-07-35 | ISO 11992-1:2019 Road vehicles — Interchange of digital information on electrical connections between towing and towed vehicles
This document is password protected. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.
GRVA/2020/30 | UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement
Proposal to introduce provisions for approving single vehicles involved in modular vehicle combinations, e.g. towing trailers, “road trains”.
GRVA-07-71 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/30 (Modular vehicle combinations)
GRVA-07-75 | UN R13: Supporting presentation for document GRVA-07-73
Presentation concerning requirements related to electric regenerative endurance braking systems.
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
|
|
| 8. (c) | Clarifications |
GRVA agreed to review a proposal tabled by the expert from France, clarifying the provisions in Annex 3, paragraph 1.5.3.1.
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA/2020/20 | UN R13-H: Proposal for a Supplement to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify the provisions in Annex 3, para. 1.5.3.1. in the case where the batteries have been recharged or replaced with a charged set between the hot performance and recovery procedure such that the linings temperature is no longer at the requisite temperature.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
GRVA agreed to review a proposal tabled by the expert from OICA introducing provisions allowing the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking systems.
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-68 | UN Regulation No. 13 and Electro-Mechanical Brakes
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
GRVA may wish to review a proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 13-H tabled by the experts from OICA and the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA) for permitting uniform behaviour of the stop lamp illumination with regard to various types of braking systems, including those of electric vehicles.
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-48 | UN R13-H: Presentation in support of document GRVA/2020/31
Presentation regarding requirements for stop lamp illumination with regard to various types of braking systems, including those of electric vehicles.
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
GRVA/2020/31 | UN R13-H: Proposal for Supplement 02 to the 01 Series of amendments
Proposal to improve the uniformity of requirements for stop lamp illumination with regard to various types of braking systems, including those of electric vehicles.
GRVA agreed to review proposals for amendments inserting requirements for endurance braking systems for vehicles equipped with an electric regenerative endurance braking system, submitted by the experts from Germany and OICA, separately.
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-47 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
GRVA-07-67 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments
Proposal to correct requirements for type-IIA (endurance braking performance) tests.
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA-07-75 | UN R13: Supporting presentation for document GRVA-07-73
Presentation concerning requirements related to electric regenerative endurance braking systems.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
|
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
GRVA/2020/20 | UN R13-H: Proposal for a Supplement to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify the provisions in Annex 3, para. 1.5.3.1. in the case where the batteries have been recharged or replaced with a charged set between the hot performance and recovery procedure such that the linings temperature is no longer at the requisite temperature.
GRVA-07-46 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/21
GRVA-07-47 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
GRVA/2020/31 | UN R13-H: Proposal for Supplement 02 to the 01 Series of amendments
Proposal to improve the uniformity of requirements for stop lamp illumination with regard to various types of braking systems, including those of electric vehicles.
GRVA-07-48 | UN R13-H: Presentation in support of document GRVA/2020/31
Presentation regarding requirements for stop lamp illumination with regard to various types of braking systems, including those of electric vehicles.
GRVA-07-67 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments
Proposal to correct requirements for type-IIA (endurance braking performance) tests.
GRVA-07-68 | UN Regulation No. 13 and Electro-Mechanical Brakes
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA-07-75 | UN R13: Supporting presentation for document GRVA-07-73
Presentation concerning requirements related to electric regenerative endurance braking systems.
GRVA-07-73/Rev.1 | UN R13: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2020/36
Proposal including amendments submitted in GRVA-07-05 and superseding document GRVA-07-47.
GRVA/2020/21 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 11 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce requirements for the type approval of Electro-Mechanical Braking (EMB) systems.
GRVA/2020/31 | UN R13-H: Proposal for Supplement 02 to the 01 Series of amendments
Proposal to improve the uniformity of requirements for stop lamp illumination with regard to various types of braking systems, including those of electric vehicles.
|
|
| 9. | Motorcycle braking | |||
| 9. (a) | UN Global Technical Regulation No. 3 |
GRVA may wish to review any proposal related to UN Global Technical Regulation (GTR) No. 3, if any. |
||
| 9. (b) | UN Regulation No. 78 |
GRVA may wish to review any proposal related to UN Regulation No. 78, if any. |
||
| 10. | UN Regulation No. 90 |
GRVA may wish to review any proposal related to UN Regulation No. 90, if any.
GRVA-07-52 | UN R90: Proposal for supplements to the 01 and 02 series of amendments
Proposal to replace the specification of the type and size of brake caliper and brake disc for brake lining CoP assessment with specifications for a pad area and thickness of the original approval. The original specification corresponds to obsolete caliper and rotor configurations no longer in widespread use.
|
GRVA-07-52 | UN R90: Proposal for supplements to the 01 and 02 series of amendments
Proposal to replace the specification of the type and size of brake caliper and brake disc for brake lining CoP assessment with specifications for a pad area and thickness of the original approval. The original specification corresponds to obsolete caliper and rotor configurations no longer in widespread use.
|
|
| 11. | Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement | |||
| 11. (a) | Implementation of relevant provisions in Revision 3 to the 1958 Agreement |
GRVA may wish to discuss actions related to the implementation of new provisions contained in Revision 3 to the 1958 Agreement on:
|
||
| 11. (b) | International Whole Vehicle Type Approval |
GRVA may wish to receive a status report on the activities of the IWG on International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) and subgroup activities, if any. |
||
| 12. | Other GRVA business | |||
| 12. (a) | List of priorities concerning GRVA activities |
GRVA may wish to discuss the priorities of GRVA.
WP.29/2020/1/Rev.1 | Revised programme of Work of the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) and its Subsidiary Bodies
|
||
| 12. (b) | Artificial Intelligence |
GRVA may wish to receive presentations from Standard Developing Organizations on their activities related to Artificial Intelligence in road vehicles, if any.
GRVA-07-33 | Update on the ITU focus group "AI4AD" related activities
GRVA-07-33 | Update on the ITU focus group "AI4AD" related activities
GRVA may wish to be informed about the discussion of the Administrative Committee for the Coordination of Work (AC.2) on this matter.
GRVA-07-33 | Update on the ITU focus group "AI4AD" related activities
|
GRVA-07-33 | Update on the ITU focus group "AI4AD" related activities
|
|
| 12. (c) | Any other business |
GRVA may wish to review the UNECE roadmap for promoting Intelligent Transport System. This roadmap was published in February 2012. The Inland Transport Committee, parent body of WP.29 requested the secretariat, in close cooperation with relevant Working Parties and subsidiary bodies, to prepare a revised roadmap for consideration in the framework of relevant Working parties, the ITC Bureau and possible adoption at its eighty-third session in February 2021, subject to availability of resources.
GRVA-07-14 | Draft revision of the UNECE roadmap on ITS
GRVA-07-76 | GRVA: List of decisions taken during the 7th (September 2020) session under the silence procedure
GRVA-07-77 | Motorcycle rider assistance and collision avoidance
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVTvLCzd3yk" target="_blank">Video used in the presentation</a> and a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt4c9o21eKw" target="_blank">recording of the presentation</a> are available via YouTube.
GRVA-07-77 | Motorcycle rider assistance and collision avoidance
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVTvLCzd3yk" target="_blank">Video used in the presentation</a> and a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt4c9o21eKw" target="_blank">recording of the presentation</a> are available via YouTube.
GRVA may wish to consider any other proposals, if available.
GRVA-07-76 | GRVA: List of decisions taken during the 7th (September 2020) session under the silence procedure
GRVA-07-77 | Motorcycle rider assistance and collision avoidance
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVTvLCzd3yk" target="_blank">Video used in the presentation</a> and a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt4c9o21eKw" target="_blank">recording of the presentation</a> are available via YouTube.
GRVA-07-77 | Motorcycle rider assistance and collision avoidance
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVTvLCzd3yk" target="_blank">Video used in the presentation</a> and a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt4c9o21eKw" target="_blank">recording of the presentation</a> are available via YouTube.
GRVA-07-77 | Motorcycle rider assistance and collision avoidance
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVTvLCzd3yk" target="_blank">Video used in the presentation</a> and a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt4c9o21eKw" target="_blank">recording of the presentation</a> are available via YouTube.
GRVA-07-77 | Motorcycle rider assistance and collision avoidance
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVTvLCzd3yk" target="_blank">Video used in the presentation</a> and a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt4c9o21eKw" target="_blank">recording of the presentation</a> are available via YouTube.
|
GRVA-07-14 | Draft revision of the UNECE roadmap on ITS
GRVA-07-76 | GRVA: List of decisions taken during the 7th (September 2020) session under the silence procedure
GRVA-07-77 | Motorcycle rider assistance and collision avoidance
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVTvLCzd3yk" target="_blank">Video used in the presentation</a> and a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt4c9o21eKw" target="_blank">recording of the presentation</a> are available via YouTube.
|
|
| 12. (d) | Tributes | |||
| 13. | Election of officers |
In compliance with Rule 37 of the Rules of Procedure (TRANS/WP.29/690 as amended), GRVA will elect the Chair and Vice-Chair(s) of the sessions scheduled for the year 2021. |