10 Jan 2020
|
FRAV-02-07
|
Automated driving: Comments on document FRAV-02-05
Document Title: Automated driving: Comments on document FRAV-02-05
|
Document Reference Number: FRAV-02-07
|
Description: Netherlands comments on the conceptual framework and principles for functional performance requirements for automated vehicles.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 2nd FRAV session (14-15
Jan 2020)
|
Document date: 10 Jan 20 (Posted 10 Jan 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Netherlands comments on the conceptual framework and principles for functional performance requirements for automated vehicles.
|
07 Jan 2020
|
TFCS-17-05
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal for Technical Service requirements
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
|
|
07 Jan 2020
|
TFCS-17-06
|
1958 Agreement Revision 3
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
|
|
16 Jan 2020
|
TFCS-17-18
|
Cybersecurity: Statement on the 00/01 series approach to a UN Regulation
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
|
|
16 Jan 2020
|
TFCS-17-19
|
Cybersecurity: Comparison of the draft 00 and 01 series of amendments
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
|
|
18 Jan 2020
|
ACSF-25-04
|
ALKS: Proposal to clarify definition of a "severe failure"
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS)
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to Automated Lane Keeping System
|
|
12 Feb 2020
|
GRVA-05-48
|
Who is in control? Road safety and automation in road traffic
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Dutch Safety Board report on ADs-equipped vehicle safety performance issues.
|
12 Feb 2020
|
GRVA-05-49
|
Presentation of the Dutch Safety Board report "Who is in Control?"
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
20 Feb 2020
|
GRSP/2020/10
|
UN R134 : Proposal for 01 series of amendments
Document Title: UN R134 : Proposal for 01 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2020/10
|
Description: Proposal by the expert from the Netherlands, aiming to achieve an identification of hydrogen-fuelled buses and trucks which is consistent with already existing regulated identification for Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) fuelled buses. The background for the additional labelling would help emergency services to determine how to approach these vehicles in case of a fire. This proposal extends the scope to N2/N3 vehicles due to the wider use and introduces consistency for the installation of labels
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 67th GRSP session (20-23
Jul 2020)
|
Document date: 20 Feb 20 (Posted 26 Feb 20)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 134 | Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle safety.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 67 | 20-23
Jul 2020
24. GRSP resumed consideration on a proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/10 and amendment GRSP-67-12) tabled by the expert from the Netherlands aimed at identifying hydrogen-fuelled buses which would be consistent with already existing regulated identification for Liquid Petroleum Gas, Compressed Natural Gas and Liquid Natural Gas fuelled buses. The expert from OICA introduced GRSP-67-29 amending, among others, the proposed transitional provisions. GRSP agreed to resume discussion of this subject at its December 2020 session based on a revised proposal tabled by the expert from the Netherlands in cooperation with the expert from OICA.
|
|
Working Party
|
Working
|
Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle safety
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Safety
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles and their components with regard to the safety- related performance of hydrogen-fuelled vehicles
|
Proposal by the expert from the Netherlands, aiming to achieve an identification of hydrogen-fuelled buses and trucks which is consistent with already existing regulated identification for Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) fuelled buses. The background for the additional labelling would help emergency services to determine how to approach these vehicles in case of a fire. This proposal extends the scope to N2/N3 vehicles due to the wider use and introduces consistency for the installation of labels
|
06 Mar 2020
|
SG-EDR-02-05
|
EDR: Netherlands proposals for document SG-EDR-01-02-Rev.3
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Event Data Recorders
EDR
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Event Data
Recorder
|
Netherlands comments on the working draft GTR on EDR.
|
11 Mar 2020
|
TPMSTI-02-04
|
Definitions of Dual, Twin, Twinned, and Twinning under UN Regulations
Document Title: Definitions of Dual, Twin, Twinned, and Twinning under UN Regulations
|
Document Reference Number: TPMSTI-02-04
|
Description: During the Task Force meeting on Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems, which was held on February 17th, 2020, there was a discussion on the proposed definition “Twin wheel”. This document provides the references to the terms ‘Dual’, ‘Twin’, ‘Twinned’ and ‘Twinning’ in the different directives and regulations.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 2nd TPMSTI session (17-18
Mar 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Mar 20 (Posted 13 Mar 20)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 141 | Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems.
|
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems
Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their tyre pressure monitoring systems
|
During the Task Force meeting on Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems, which was held on February 17th, 2020, there was a discussion on the proposed definition “Twin wheel”. This document provides the references to the terms ‘Dual’, ‘Twin’, ‘Twinned’ and ‘Twinning’ in the different directives and regulations.
|
11 Mar 2020
|
TPMSTI-02-07
|
UN R142: Proposal for amendments (para. 5.2.3.2.5.)
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Tyre Installation
Tyre Installation
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the installation of their tyres (tentative title pending regulation development)
|
|
20 May 2020
|
SG-EDR-05-04
|
EDR: Proposals for data capture and triggering provisions
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Event Data Recorders
EDR
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Event Data
Recorder
|
|
18 May 2020
|
TPMSTI-04-04
|
UN R142: Proposal regarding maximum load rating
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Tyre Installation
Tyre Installation
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the installation of their tyres (tentative title pending regulation development)
|
|
18 May 2020
|
TPMSTI-04-06
|
UN R141: Input for the 4th TPMSTI task force session
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems
Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their tyre pressure monitoring systems
|
|
29 May 2020
|
OBD2CG-19-02
|
GTR 18: Comments on draft Amendment 1
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Motorcycle On-Board Diagnostic Systems
L-OBD
Project to establish a Global Technical Regulation and its homologous UN Regulation for motorcycle and moped on-board diagnostic systems.
|
|
05 Jun 2020
|
VMAD-07-09
|
Comments on the VMAD Master Document
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
09 Jun 2020
|
SG-EDR-06-06
|
EDR data capture and triggering provisions proposal
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Event Data Recorders
EDR
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Event Data
Recorder
|
|
05 Jun 2020
|
VMAD-07-15
|
Validation Methods for Automated Driving (VMAD): New Assessment/Test Method (NATM)
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
VMAD co-chairs' orientation presentation for the 7th session teleconference.
|
12 Jun 2020
|
TPMSTI-05-11
|
UN R142: Comments on tyre pressures
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Tyre Installation
Tyre Installation
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the installation of their tyres (tentative title pending regulation development)
|
|
08 Jul 2020
|
GRSP-67-05
|
Reservation over Type Approval E20 44R 04 4013 – Braxx Smart Kid Belt
Document Title: Reservation over Type Approval E20 44R 04 4013 – Braxx Smart Kid Belt
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP-67-05
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 67th GRSP session (20-23
Jul 2020)
|
Document date: 08 Jul 20 (Posted 08 Jul 20)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 44 | Child Restraint Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 67 | 20-23
Jul 2020
30. The expert from Poland requested deferral of discussion on the belt-guide, that was type approved by the authority of her country, to the December 2020 session of GRSP due to the research test results on the belt-guide, which had not yet been made available by the expert of EC. The experts from the Netherlands and ANEC/CI argued that discussion was needed on this subject since they considered this type of CRS as dangerous. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRSP-67-05 explaining that the belt-guide was not in the scope of the UN Regulation and could not be type approved; as such, the type approval should be withdrawn. Finally, with reference to the procedure of the 1958 Agreement, Revision 3, Articles 4.2., 10.4 and Schedule 6 (paragraphs 2 and 3), he stated that through GRSP-67-05 he sought support from other contracting parties and cooperation from the expert of Poland to avoid starting the arbitration process – according to Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement. The expert from ANEC/CI, introduced GRSP-67-10 and GRSP-67-36 showing the high risk of abdominal injuries in both cases due to severe submarining. In anticipation of the above-mentioned test results, the expert from Poland introduced GRSP-67-32, showing some results of tests demonstrating the performance of this belt-guide type under laboratory conditions. She also clarified that the belt-guide was type approved according to Supplement 10 to the 04 series of amendments. However, she added that according to some stakeholder opinions, this belt-guide type should had been tested according to Supplement 11, thus making the device subject to different criteria. However, she stated that in her opinion there was a clear legal basis which demonstrated that the type approval granted under Supplement 10 was the correct one. The expert of the Netherlands responded by stating that, apart from the fact that this device does not comply with several requirements of UN Regulation No. 44, a supplement only clarifies existing requirements or test procedures and does not introduce new requirements. Even when Supplement 10 was in force, it was evident that a belt guide could not be approved as a child restraint.
31. The expert from EC recalled to GRSP, that the group had agreed to his former proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/28) to amend the scope of UN Regulation No 44 (Child Restraint Systems) with clarification that a belt-guide cannot be approved under Regulation 44 without being part of a child restraint system (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/66, paragraphs 27 and 28). However, he explained that EC had reconsidered the document submission to WP.29, since the interpretation that a “guide strap” and similar devices cannot be separately approved as a child restraint system, had already been endorsed by WP.29 at its March 2012 session (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1095, paragraph 35). Therefore, he introduced GRSP-67-31, that was only on the phase out of UN Regulation No. 44.
32. The Chair of GRSP referred to Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and stressed full consideration of the different opinions of the Type Approval Authorities of the concerned contracting parties, and of contracting parties applying UN Regulation No. 44. Therefore, the experts from France, Germany, Italy, Russian Federation, Spain, Switzerland and United Kingdom explicitly endorsed the request of the expert from the Netherlands to withdraw the type approval granted by Poland on the belt-guide, while none of the other present delegates indicated abstention or disagreement. The experts also noted that the Chair encouraged the expert of the Netherlands to continue discussions with the Type Approval Authority of Poland to seek cooperation with Poland in the aim to avoid the arbitration process according to Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, which would start in the November 2020 session of WP.29.
33. GRSP also considered GRSP-67-14, tabled by the expert from France to correct a date in transitional provisions. Finally, GRSP adopted GRSP-67-14 and GRSP-67-31, as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the two proposals as draft Supplement 18 to the 04 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 44, for consideration and vote at the November 2020 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 68 | 7-11
Dec 2020
14. Referring to the request made by the Administrative Committee for the Coordination of Work of WP.29 (WP.29/AC.2) (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1155, para. 30), GRSP resumed discussion on the belt-guide device type approved as Child Restraint System (CRS) according to UN Regulation No. 44 by the Type Approval Authority of Poland. The expert from the Netherlands introduced a presentation (GRSP-68-24), showing additional test results performed on the belt-guide. He added that the tests confirmed the conclusion laid out in document GRSP-67-05, introduced at the July 2020 session of GRSP and in addition showed that the device does not conform to the dynamic test requirements when tested with the P10 dummy. Therefore, he stated:
- The belt-guide was not in the scope of the UN Regulation and could not be type approved; as such, the type approval should be withdrawn.
- The device did not meet several requirements, both technical and with regard to instructions for users and therefore approval should not have been granted.
- The car design determines the level of protection for a great deal of cases and may result in submarining and/or in injuries in the abdominal area, since the device sold as a child restraint does not offer adequate protection or guidance in this respect.
- The device could offer better protection than the adult belt itself but lacks the additional protection of a CRS.
- Since approval of this device was issued erroneously, it shall be withdrawn, and Market Surveillance Authorities should be informed.
The expert of the Netherlands further added that for the time being he was not requesting an arbitration process according to Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, because a parallel investigation is being conducted at the European Commission level. The expert from Poland introduced GRSP-68-27 arguing against the conclusions of GRSP-68-24 and providing clarifications on the belt-guide dynamic test performances. He stated:
- During last year there had been numerous different unsubstantiated allegations against the belt guide, e.g.: submarining (GRSP-50-09 and GRSP-50-25), vertical component (GRSP-65-20), risk of abdominal injury. However, he added these allegations were not demonstrated.
- Type-approval tests according to the UN Regulation requirements were conducted by Polish technical service – PIMOT in 2017, which conducted more than 160 tests by using dummies required by the UN regulation (P3, P6 and P10 type), showing satisfactory results.
He concluded that in December 2019, after comparative tests with other CRS showed problems with other type-approved CRS, the discussion in GRSP should be broadened to focus on other CRS as well. The expert from Spain, stated that the focus should be on the interpretation that a belt-guide and similar devices cannot be separately approved as a CRS.
|
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Child Restraint Systems
Child Restraint Systems
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Restraining Devices for Child Occupants of Power-driven Vehicles ("Child Restraint System")
|
|
09 Jul 2020
|
VMAD-08-08
|
Comments on the VMAD subgroup discussion papers
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
10 Jul 2020
|
VMAD-08-09
|
VMAD co-chairs' introductory presentation for the 8th informal group session
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
17 Jul 2020
|
GRSP-67-12
|
UN R134: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
Document Title: UN R134: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP-67-12
|
Description: Proposal to update the draft 01 series proposal (GRSP/2020/10) to include recommendations with regard to place and dimensions of the labels on vehicles.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 67th GRSP session (20-23
Jul 2020)
|
Document date: 17 Jul 20 (Posted 19 Jul 20)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 134 | Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle safety.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 67 | 20-23
Jul 2020
24. GRSP resumed consideration on a proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/10 and amendment GRSP-67-12) tabled by the expert from the Netherlands aimed at identifying hydrogen-fuelled buses which would be consistent with already existing regulated identification for Liquid Petroleum Gas, Compressed Natural Gas and Liquid Natural Gas fuelled buses. The expert from OICA introduced GRSP-67-29 amending, among others, the proposed transitional provisions. GRSP agreed to resume discussion of this subject at its December 2020 session based on a revised proposal tabled by the expert from the Netherlands in cooperation with the expert from OICA.
|
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle safety
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Safety
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles and their components with regard to the safety- related performance of hydrogen-fuelled vehicles
|
Proposal to update the draft 01 series proposal (GRSP/2020/10) to include recommendations with regard to place and dimensions of the labels on vehicles.
|
20 Jul 2020
|
GRSP-67-30
|
GTR 9: Proposal for Amendment 3 - Revised Final Progress Report
Document Title: GTR 9: Proposal for Amendment 3 - Revised Final Progress Report
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP-67-30
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 67th GRSP session (20-23
Jul 2020)
|
Document date: 20 Jul 20 (Posted 20 Jul 20)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns GTR No. 9 | Pedestrian Safety.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Pedestrian Safety
Pedestrian Safety (GTR)
Global Technical Regulation No. 9: Pedestrian Safety
|
|
25 Aug 2020
|
TPMSTI-08-05
|
UN R141: Proposal for draft amendment
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems
Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their tyre pressure monitoring systems
|
|
08 Sep 2020
|
FRAV-04-14
|
Input for the 4th FRAV session
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
24 Sep 2020
|
GRSP/2020/17
|
UN R134: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
Document Title: UN R134: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2020/17
|
Description: Proposal to align UN R134 with UN R67 and UN R110 with regard to labelling requirements and to assist emergency services in determining appropriate responses in case of fire.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 68th GRSP session (7-11
Dec 2020)
|
Document date: 24 Sep 20 (Posted 28 Sep 20)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 134 | Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle safety.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 68 | 7-11
Dec 2020
25. GRSP resumed consideration on a proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/17) tabled by the expert from the Netherlands aimed at identifying hydrogen-fuelled buses which would be consistent with already existing regulated identification for Liquid Petroleum Gas, Compressed Natural Gas and Liquid Natural Gas fuelled buses. GRSP adopted the proposal not amended and requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/17 as draft 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 134, for consideration and vote at the June 2021 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
26. The expert from OICA also noted that further discussions on the UN Regulation would be needed to solve a number of inconsistencies concerning heavy-duty vehicles (trucks and buses). GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2021 session on the basis of a proposal tabled by the expert from OICA.
|
|
Working Party
|
Working
|
Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle safety
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Safety
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles and their components with regard to the safety- related performance of hydrogen-fuelled vehicles
|
Proposal to align UN R134 with UN R67 and UN R110 with regard to labelling requirements and to assist emergency services in determining appropriate responses in case of fire.
|
01 Oct 2020
|
GRSG-119-15
|
UN R58: Proposal for amendments
Document Title: UN R58: Proposal for amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRSG-119-15
|
Description: Proposal to align UN R58 with EU Regulation 1230/2012 with regard to access ramps.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 119th GRSG session (6-9
Oct 2020) and 121st GRSG session (12-16
Apr 2021)
|
Document date: 01 Oct 20 (Posted 03 Oct 20)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 58 | Rear Underrun Protection Devices.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on General Safety | Session 119 | 6-9
Oct 2020
35. The expert from the Netherlands presented a proposal for an amendment of Part II and III of a type of rear underrun protective device (RUPD) pursuant to UN Regulation No. 58 (GRSG-119-15), addressing platform lift systems and access ramps in M, N1, N2 category vehicles.
36. GRSG decided to continue consideration of document GRSG-119-15 at the April 2021 meeting of the group, based on a revised version pending further consultations on its content.
|
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Rear Underrun Protection Devices
Rear Underrun Protection Devices
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of:
I. Rear Underrun Protective Devices (RUPDS)
II. Vehicles with regard to the Installation of an RUPD of an Approved Type
III. Vehicles with regard to their Rear Underrun Protection (RUP)
|
Proposal to align UN R58 with EU Regulation 1230/2012 with regard to access ramps.
|
02 Oct 2020
|
GRSG-119-16
|
UN R110: Proposal for amendments
Document Title: UN R110: Proposal for amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRSG-119-16
|
Description: Proposal to adapt to technological progress and align UN R110 with ISO 15500 and NGV 3.1.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 119th GRSG session (6-9
Oct 2020)
|
Document date: 02 Oct 20 (Posted 03 Oct 20)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 110 | Compressed and Liquefied Natural Gas System Components.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on General Safety | Session 119 | 6-9
Oct 2020
44. The expert from the Netherlands introduced document GRSG-119-16, containing a proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 110, proposing the introduction of requirements related to the state-of-the-art test requirements and harmonization with ISO 15500 and NGV 3.1 components used in LNG/CNG systems.
45. GRSG considered document GRSG-119-16 and requested its submission as an official document for consideration at the April 2021 session of GRSG.
|
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Compressed and Liquefied Natural Gas System Components
CNG/LNG System Components
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of:
I. Specific components of motor vehicles using compressed natural gas (CNG) and/or liquefied natural gas (LNG) in their propulsion system;
II. Vehicles with regard to the installation of specific components of an approved type for the use of compressed natural gas (CNG) and/or liquefied natural gas (LNG) in their propulsion system.
|
Proposal to adapt to technological progress and align UN R110 with ISO 15500 and NGV 3.1.
|
22 Oct 2020
|
FRAV-06-10
|
Automated driving: Human factors performance requirements
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
28 Oct 2020
|
VMAD-14-07
|
Comments on the VMAD Master Document
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
08 Sep 2020
|
TF-FVA-01-01
|
Netherlands TAAM questions regarding Field of View Assistant
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Driver Forward Field of Vision
Driver Forward Vision
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles with regard to the Forward Field of Vision of the Motor Vehicle Driver
|
|
21 Oct 2020
|
TF-FVA-02-03
|
UN R125: Netherlands mark up of OICA field of vision assistant proposal
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Driver Forward Field of Vision
Driver Forward Vision
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Motor Vehicles with regard to the Forward Field of Vision of the Motor Vehicle Driver
|
|
30 Nov 2020
|
FRAV-08-07
|
Automated driving: Comments on document FRAV-06-04
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
08 Dec 2020
|
FRAV-08-10
|
Proposal for Document 5, para. 4.13.2. on ADS interactions with the user
|
Informal Group
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
07 Dec 2020
|
GRSP-68-16
|
UN R145: Proposal for a Supplement 1
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions
ISOFIX anchorage systems
|
Proposal to clarify the requirements for the location of ISOFIX systems in case the vehicle type is equipped with rearward facing seats.
|
07 Dec 2020
|
GRSP-68-24
|
Comments on the Braxx Smart Kid Belt
Document Title: Comments on the Braxx Smart Kid Belt
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP-68-24
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 68th GRSP session (7-11
Dec 2020)
|
Document date: 07 Dec 20 (Posted 09 Dec 20)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 129 | Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 68 | 7-11
Dec 2020
14. Referring to the request made by the Administrative Committee for the Coordination of Work of WP.29 (WP.29/AC.2) (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1155, para. 30), GRSP resumed discussion on the belt-guide device type approved as Child Restraint System (CRS) according to UN Regulation No. 44 by the Type Approval Authority of Poland. The expert from the Netherlands introduced a presentation (GRSP-68-24), showing additional test results performed on the belt-guide. He added that the tests confirmed the conclusion laid out in document GRSP-67-05, introduced at the July 2020 session of GRSP and in addition showed that the device does not conform to the dynamic test requirements when tested with the P10 dummy. Therefore, he stated:
- The belt-guide was not in the scope of the UN Regulation and could not be type approved; as such, the type approval should be withdrawn.
- The device did not meet several requirements, both technical and with regard to instructions for users and therefore approval should not have been granted.
- The car design determines the level of protection for a great deal of cases and may result in submarining and/or in injuries in the abdominal area, since the device sold as a child restraint does not offer adequate protection or guidance in this respect.
- The device could offer better protection than the adult belt itself but lacks the additional protection of a CRS.
- Since approval of this device was issued erroneously, it shall be withdrawn, and Market Surveillance Authorities should be informed.
The expert of the Netherlands further added that for the time being he was not requesting an arbitration process according to Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, because a parallel investigation is being conducted at the European Commission level. The expert from Poland introduced GRSP-68-27 arguing against the conclusions of GRSP-68-24 and providing clarifications on the belt-guide dynamic test performances. He stated:
- During last year there had been numerous different unsubstantiated allegations against the belt guide, e.g.: submarining (GRSP-50-09 and GRSP-50-25), vertical component (GRSP-65-20), risk of abdominal injury. However, he added these allegations were not demonstrated.
- Type-approval tests according to the UN Regulation requirements were conducted by Polish technical service – PIMOT in 2017, which conducted more than 160 tests by using dummies required by the UN regulation (P3, P6 and P10 type), showing satisfactory results.
He concluded that in December 2019, after comparative tests with other CRS showed problems with other type-approved CRS, the discussion in GRSP should be broadened to focus on other CRS as well. The expert from Spain, stated that the focus should be on the interpretation that a belt-guide and similar devices cannot be separately approved as a CRS.
|
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
|
11 Dec 2020
|
GRSP-68-33
|
Invalid Approval E20 44R 044013 Smart Kid Belt
Document Title: Invalid Approval E20 44R 044013 Smart Kid Belt
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP-68-33
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Meeting Session: 68th GRSP session (7-11
Dec 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Dec 20 (Posted 11 Dec 20)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 44 | Child Restraint Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 68 | 7-11
Dec 2020
14. Referring to the request made by the Administrative Committee for the Coordination of Work of WP.29 (WP.29/AC.2) (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1155, para. 30), GRSP resumed discussion on the belt-guide device type approved as Child Restraint System (CRS) according to UN Regulation No. 44 by the Type Approval Authority of Poland. The expert from the Netherlands introduced a presentation (GRSP-68-24), showing additional test results performed on the belt-guide. He added that the tests confirmed the conclusion laid out in document GRSP-67-05, introduced at the July 2020 session of GRSP and in addition showed that the device does not conform to the dynamic test requirements when tested with the P10 dummy. Therefore, he stated:
- The belt-guide was not in the scope of the UN Regulation and could not be type approved; as such, the type approval should be withdrawn.
- The device did not meet several requirements, both technical and with regard to instructions for users and therefore approval should not have been granted.
- The car design determines the level of protection for a great deal of cases and may result in submarining and/or in injuries in the abdominal area, since the device sold as a child restraint does not offer adequate protection or guidance in this respect.
- The device could offer better protection than the adult belt itself but lacks the additional protection of a CRS.
- Since approval of this device was issued erroneously, it shall be withdrawn, and Market Surveillance Authorities should be informed.
The expert of the Netherlands further added that for the time being he was not requesting an arbitration process according to Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, because a parallel investigation is being conducted at the European Commission level. The expert from Poland introduced GRSP-68-27 arguing against the conclusions of GRSP-68-24 and providing clarifications on the belt-guide dynamic test performances. He stated:
- During last year there had been numerous different unsubstantiated allegations against the belt guide, e.g.: submarining (GRSP-50-09 and GRSP-50-25), vertical component (GRSP-65-20), risk of abdominal injury. However, he added these allegations were not demonstrated.
- Type-approval tests according to the UN Regulation requirements were conducted by Polish technical service – PIMOT in 2017, which conducted more than 160 tests by using dummies required by the UN regulation (P3, P6 and P10 type), showing satisfactory results.
He concluded that in December 2019, after comparative tests with other CRS showed problems with other type-approved CRS, the discussion in GRSP should be broadened to focus on other CRS as well. The expert from Spain, stated that the focus should be on the interpretation that a belt-guide and similar devices cannot be separately approved as a CRS.
|
|
Working Party
|
Informal
|
Child Restraint Systems
Child Restraint Systems
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Restraining Devices for Child Occupants of Power-driven Vehicles ("Child Restraint System")
|
|
22 Dec 2020
|
WP.1/2019/3/Rev.2
|
Revised safety considerations for activities other than driving undertaken by the driver in a vehicle when its automated driving system is engaged
|
Forum
|
Working
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
30 Oct 2020
|
VMAD-SG3-3.1-03
|
Comments on the draft Audit/In-Use Performance sections of the VMAD Master Document
|
Informal Subgroup
|
Informal
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|