| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document title | Proposal for amendments to informal document GRRF-78-05 | ||||||||||
| Date | 22 Oct 2014 |
Revised proposal to introduce a definition and provisions for lane-keeping assist systems (LKAS) into UN R79. |
|||||||||
| Source(s) | Japan | ||||||||||
| Status | |||||||||||
| Rulemaking area(s) | |||||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||||
| Related documents | |||||||||||
| GRRF-78-05 | Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 (Superseded) | ||||||||||
| Downloads: | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||||
| LKAS | Session 2 | 23-24 Oct 2014 |
J presented document LKAS-02-02 as the results of the discussions that took place at GRRF-78, where the Chair requested wording improvements, and the status of the system as “ready to intervene”. NL questioned the case when the system is intervening then the markings disappear, hence the LKAS turns to switched-off status. NL was of the opinion that, in that case, the LKAS should continue warning after it is turned into switched-off status. CLEPA recalled that the group agreed that the driver is assumed to be monitoring the driving tasks. |
||||||||||