| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | UN Regulation No. 94 test matrix | ||||||||
| Reference Number | FI-20-0x | ||||||||
| Date |
9 Apr 2013
|
||||||||
| Summary | Working document of the Informal Group on Frontal Impact. | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R94 Frontal Collision Protection | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .xls format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| FI | Session 20 | 9 Apr 2013 |
The group worked on the Test Matrix document FI-20-0×. Mr. Pott (OICA) said that OICA is in favor of putting the 5th percentile dummy to the driver position for the offset test. Mr. Thompson highlighted that it is important to see the impact of the modification in real world. What developments can the change in testing drive? Mr. Broertjes commented that it could also be an option to leave the decision about the 5th percentile positioning to the type approval authorities. As regards the injury criteria a 42mm thorax deflection for the ODB test was generally accepted. Suggestions for other injury criteria limits have been included in the Test Matrix document FI-20-0xe. With regard to the full width test Peter Broertjes mentioned that the EC still has concerns as regards the selection between Full Width Rigid Barrier and Full Width Deformable Barrier testing. |
||||||||