| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Proposal for Corrigendum 3 to GTR No. 9 | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRSP/2011/12 | ||||||||
| Date |
2 Mar 2011
|
||||||||
| Source(s) | Japan | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | GTR No. 9 Pedestrian Safety (GTR) | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRSP | Session 49 | 16-20 May 2011 |
9. GRSP agreed to consider this subject under agenda item 4(c). 10. GRSP considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2011/12, GRSP-49-17 and GRSP-49-18 proposing a corrigendum to the gtr. The expert from OICA made a presentation (GRSP-49-31) justifying his proposal (GRSP-49-09) to clarify the headform test procedure. It was agreed to resume discussion on this agenda item at the December 2011 session of GRSP. The expert from the Netherlands volunteered to prepare a consolidated proposal of amendments (including ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2011/12, GRSP-49-17, GRSP-49-18 and GRSP-49-09). He offered to submit it together with an official proposal of developing an amendment to the gtr for the November 2011 sessions of WP.29 and AC.3. |
||||||||