| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Explanation of dolly performance simulation data | ||||||||
| Reference Number | MVC-05-04 | ||||||||
| Date |
7 Dec 2015
|
||||||||
| Source(s) | CLEPA | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R55 Mechanical Couplings | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| MVC | Session 5 | 26-27 Oct 2015 |
Type 0 requirements (value of deceleration) MP (CLEPA/BPW) was of the opinion that the dolly should be considered as a truck for semi-trailer because that permits the combination “dolly + semitrailer” to have a braking capability average of 50% (i.e. 45 + 55%). Should the dolly take only 50%, then the combination would take less than 50%. BS (CLEPA/VBG) presented some slides (MVC-05-03 and MVC-05-04 – summary of the Eindhoven study) showing dolly braking performances in case of high braking conditions. There was a debate on the load transfer in case of a combination of tractor/dolly/semi-trailer (Case D). In case of braking, one part of the load of the semi-trailer is transferred to the tractor (via the dolly). The experts wondered whether the dolly could take 50% of the braking. The chair feared that a too low value for the dolly could generate a jack-knife situation. Conclusion: Compatibility bands for dollies The group decided to postpone to the next meeting the decision this item (central axle trailer vs. tractor/semi-trailer combination). |
||||||||