| UN R48 Installation of LightingWP.29/2017/110 | Proposal to delete transitional provision subparagraphs that only apply to the 05 series of amendments to UN R48, but were erroneously kept in the 06 series of amendments. |
48 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to delete transitional provision subparagraphs that only apply to the 05 series of amendments to UN R48, but were erroneously kept in the 06 series of amendments.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/110
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 34 of the 45 Contracting Parties applying UN R48 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/110, as amended by para. 67 per the session report,
by a vote of 34 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
173rd WP.29 session (14-17
Nov 2017)
66. The World Forum considered the draft amendment under agenda item 4.6.1 and recommended its submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the following correction:
67. In document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/110, page 2, second last item replace the amendment “Paragraph 6.19.8., footnote 14, delete.” by “Paragraph 6.19., footnote 14, delete.”
|
|
59 |
14876 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R12 Steering MechanismWP.29/2017/118 | Proposal to enable approval testing under UN R137 as an alternative to UN R12 in order to avoid redundant testing requirements. The proposal adds references to the steering gear provisions of UN R137 (full width frontal impact) as a compliance alternative in parallel to the current references similarly allowing compliance via provisions in UN R94 (offset deformable barrier frontal impact). |
12 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to enable approval testing under UN R137 as an alternative to UN R12 in order to avoid redundant testing requirements. The proposal adds references to the steering gear provisions of UN R137 (full width frontal impact) as a compliance alternative in parallel to the current references similarly allowing compliance via provisions in UN R94 (offset deformable barrier frontal impact).
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/118
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 34 of the 43 Contracting Parties applying UN R12 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/118 by a vote of 34 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/6 | Draft Supplement 5 to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 12
Related discussions
12. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/6, to allow alternative requirements of Regulation No. 137 to avoid redundancy of testing. GRSP adopted the proposal not amended. The secretariat was requested to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/6 as draft Supplement 5 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 12, for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and of the Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement (AC.1).
|
|
22 |
14894 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R14 Safety-Belt/ISOFIX AnchoragesWP.29/2017/128 | Proposal to transfer all ISOFIX requirements from UN R14 into a new UN Regulation. Within the context of the international whole vehicle type approval program, the removal of these CRS anchorage provisions would align UN R14 with its Australian Design Rule counterpart and enable Australia to apply the revised UN R14 narrowed down to adult seat-belt anchorages only. |
14 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to transfer all ISOFIX requirements from UN R14 into a new UN Regulation. Within the context of the international whole vehicle type approval program, the removal of these CRS anchorage provisions would align UN R14 with its Australian Design Rule counterpart and enable Australia to apply the revised UN R14 narrowed down to adult seat-belt anchorages only.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/128
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 35 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R14 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/128 by a vote of 35 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/8 | Proposal for the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 14
GRSP-61-01 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 14
Related discussions
13. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/8 as the official proposal to remove ISOFIX anchorages from the Regulation and to incorporate them into the new Regulation that was dedicated to these anchorages only (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/7, see para. 45). GRSP adopted the proposal, as amended below, as the most viable solution to solve the incompatibility of the requirements of the Regulation with the existing designs of Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in Australia and including UN Regulation No. 14 into Annex 4 of the future UN Regulation No. 0 on the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA). The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal as draft 08 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 14, for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
Paragraph 3.2.1., amend to read:
“3.2.1. Drawings of the general vehicle structure on an appropriate scale, showing the positions of the belt anchorages, of the effective belt anchorages (where appropriate) and detailed drawings of the belt anchorages;”
14. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-61-01 to clarify that on the driver’s seat of vehicle categories M2 and M3, only three point belts would be allowed. GRSP agreed on the clarifications proposed by the expert from Germany and adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex III of this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal as part (see para. 13 above) of the draft 08 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 14, for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
17. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-61-02, matching the proposal on safety-belt anchorages (GRSP-61-01) (see para. 14 above). The expert from OICA requested transitional provisions for the entry into force of the proposed requirements. GRSP agreed to resume discussion at its December 2017 session on the basis of a revised proposal tabled by the expert from Germany.
|
|
25 |
14904 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R16 Safety belt systemsWP.29/2017/120 | For the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, a UN Regulation is split in two regulations, UN Regulation No. 14-08 series of amendments including only adult safety belt anchorages and a new regulation UN Regulation No. [XX] will include all requirements for child restraint anchorages. Accordingly, this proposal would update the references to UN Regulation No. 14 in UN Regulation No. 16 in order to recognize child restraint system anchorages installed on the vehicle and approved under the new regulation. |
16 |
|
Description
|
|
For the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, a UN Regulation is split in two regulations, UN Regulation No. 14-08 series of amendments including only adult safety belt anchorages and a new regulation UN Regulation No. [XX] will include all requirements for child restraint anchorages. Accordingly, this proposal would update the references to UN Regulation No. 14 in UN Regulation No. 16 in order to recognize child restraint system anchorages installed on the vehicle and approved under the new regulation.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/120
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 34 of the 46 Contracting Parties applying UN R16 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/120 by a vote of 34 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/9 | Proposal for supplement 2 to the 07 series of amendments to Regulation No. 16
GRSP-62-08 | UN R16: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 10 to the 06 series of amendments and Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 2 to the 07 series of amendments
WP.29/2018/76 | UN R16: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 2 to the 07 series of amendments
Related discussions
16. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/9 to insert the cross reference to the new UN Regulation on ISOFIX. GRSP adopted the proposal as amended below. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal as draft Supplement 10 to the 06 series and Supplement 2 to the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16, for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
Paragraph 8.3.6., amend to read:
“8.3.6. …
The pitch angle used for the geometrical assessment above shall be as measured in paragraph 5.2.2.4 or Regulation No. [XX].
…”
14. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/21 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/22 to correct typo errors. The expert from Japan proposed GRSP-62-06-Rev.2 (amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/21), GRSP-62-07-Rev.1 (amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/22) and GRSP-62-08 to complete the set of corrections. Finally, GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/21 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/22 as amended by Annex IV and GRSP-62-08 as reproduced by Annex IV to the report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals for consideration and vote to the June 2018 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1: a) ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/21 as Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 9 to the 06 series of amendments, b) ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/22 as Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 1 to the 07 series of amendments and c) GRSP-62-08 as Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 10 to the 06 series of amendments and Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 2 to the 07 series of amendments.
|
|
27 |
14895 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R17 Strength of SeatsWP.29/2017/122 | Proposal to clarify the testing of seats with and without head restraints. This proposal would allow alternatives at the request of the manufacturer by clarifying that under testing of a bench seat with three seating positions and two head restraints, a moment of 3 × 373Nm shall be applied to the back of seats and of 2 × 373Nm to the head restraints:<ol class="alpha"><li>If the manufacturer wants to comply with the test requirements of paragraph 6.2. (strength of the seat-back), by the test of head restraint performance of paragraph 6.4., they choose to apply 53 daNm to each seat back without head restraint and 89 daN to each head restraint. In this case only one test shall be performed.</li><li>If the manufacturer chooses not to apply 53 daNm, during the test of paragraph 6.4., the seat back strength test of paragraph 6.2. has to be performed in addition to the test of paragraph 6.4.</li></ol> |
17 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to clarify the testing of seats with and without head restraints. This proposal would allow alternatives at the request of the manufacturer by clarifying that under testing of a bench seat with three seating positions and two head restraints, a moment of 3 × 373Nm shall be applied to the back of seats and of 2 × 373Nm to the head restraints: - If the manufacturer wants to comply with the test requirements of paragraph 6.2. (strength of the seat-back), by the test of head restraint performance of paragraph 6.4., they choose to apply 53 daNm to each seat back without head restraint and 89 daN to each head restraint. In this case only one test shall be performed.
- If the manufacturer chooses not to apply 53 daNm, during the test of paragraph 6.4., the seat back strength test of paragraph 6.2. has to be performed in addition to the test of paragraph 6.4.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/122
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 35 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R17 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/122 by a vote of 35 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/12 | Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17
GRSP-61-26 | Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 08 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17
Related discussions
20. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/12 to clarify the testing of seats with and without head restraints. Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced GRSP-61-26 incorporating the comments received from the experts from Germany and EC. Finally, GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/12 as amended by Annex IV to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal as draft Supplement 4 to the 08 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 17 for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
|
28 |
14897 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R43 Safety GlazingWP.29/2017/111 | Proposal to align the headform test with the deceleration measurement and the test of resistance to abrasion with ISO 15082:2016-11, including changes to the test details, correction of the headform calibration values, and the introduction of abrasion reference materials. The latter is combined with an abrasive-wheel qualification and a correction calculation (for plastic materials only).
The proposal also amends Figure 2a of Annex 21 to better reflect the meaning of paragraph 2.4.2.2. of Annex 21, mainly to clarify the lateral limits of any opaque obscuration in this area. |
43 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to align the headform test with the deceleration measurement and the test of resistance to abrasion with ISO 15082:2016-11, including changes to the test details, correction of the headform calibration values, and the introduction of abrasion reference materials. The latter is combined with an abrasive-wheel qualification and a correction calculation (for plastic materials only).
The proposal also amends Figure 2a of Annex 21 to better reflect the meaning of paragraph 2.4.2.2. of Annex 21, mainly to clarify the lateral limits of any opaque obscuration in this area.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/111
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 35 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R43 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/111 by a vote of 35 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG/2017/6 | Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 43
GRSG/2017/8 | Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 43
Related discussions
11. The expert from Germany introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/6 to fully align (a) the provisions for the headform test with deceleration measurement and (b) the test of resistance to abrasion with those of the corresponding standard ISO 15082:2016-11. He added that the main amendments according to this standard were the addition or modification of important test details, the correction of the headform calibration values and the introduction of abrasion reference materials; the latter combined with an abrasive-wheel qualification and a correction calculation (for plastic materials only). GRSG welcomed the proposal and noted some minor editorial corrections. Following the discussion, GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/6 and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 43 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
12. The expert from CLEPA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/8, proposing to clarify in Figure 2a of Annex 21 the lateral limits of any opaque obscuration. GRSG noted general support and adopted the proposal. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see para. 11 above) of draft Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 43 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
|
|
54 |
14879 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R44 Child Restraint SystemsWP.29/2017/123 | Proposal to amend UN R44 in line with the proposal to amend UN R14 in order to separate child restraint provisions (including ISOFIX anchorage provisions) into a new UN Regulation. The ISOFIX amendment to UN R14 has been introduced to facilitate the establishment of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) regulation by limiting the scope of UN R14 to adult safety belts. |
44 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to amend UN R44 in line with the proposal to amend UN R14 in order to separate child restraint provisions (including ISOFIX anchorage provisions) into a new UN Regulation. The ISOFIX amendment to UN R14 has been introduced to facilitate the establishment of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) regulation by limiting the scope of UN R14 to adult safety belts.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/123
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 33 of the 43 Contracting Parties applying UN R44 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/123 by a vote of 33 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/10 | Proposal for Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 44
GRSP/2017/13 | Proposal for Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 44
GRSP/2017/14 | Proposal for Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 44
GRSP-61-14/Rev.1 | Amendment to the justification for Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 44 (GRSP/2017/13)
Related discussions
28. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/10 which aligns the text of the Regulation for the purpose of splitting UN Regulation No. 14. GRSP adopted the proposal not amended and requested the secretariat to submit it for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 44.
29. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRSP-61-14-Rev.1 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/13 aimed at excluding dangerous interpretations on the installation of CRS and introducing amendments proposed by the expert from CLEPA (GRSP-61-32). GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/13 as amended by Annex V to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal for consideration and vote to the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see para. 28 above) of draft Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 44.
30. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/14 on the description of the “new-born” manikins Q0 and P0. GRSP adopted the proposal not amended and requested the secretariat to submit it for consideration and vote to the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see paras. 28 and 29 above) of draft Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 44.
|
|
55 |
14899 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R46 Indirect VisionWP.29/2017/113 | Proposal to correct paragraph 16.1.3.1. as follows: "The minimum and the average magnification factors of the CMS, in both horizontal and vertical directions shall not be lower than the <strike>minimum average</strike> magnification factor<b>s</b> indicated below." The latter reference to "minimum average" should be deleted since the subsequent text provides the required minimum and average magnification factors.
The proposal also corrects the cross-reference in paragraph 6.3.3.2. where “the test shall satisfy the conditions laid down in paragraph 6.1.3. of this Regulation” should refer to paragraph 6.1.1.3. and aligns the communication form with with the scope of the Regulation regarding vehicle categories (adding category L). |
46 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to correct paragraph 16.1.3.1. as follows: “The minimum and the average magnification factors of the CMS, in both horizontal and vertical directions shall not be lower than the minimum average magnification factors indicated below.” The latter reference to “minimum average” should be deleted since the subsequent text provides the required minimum and average magnification factors.
The proposal also corrects the cross-reference in paragraph 6.3.3.2. where “the test shall satisfy the conditions laid down in paragraph 6.1.3. of this Regulation” should refer to paragraph 6.1.1.3. and aligns the communication form with with the scope of the Regulation regarding vehicle categories (adding category L).
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/113
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 34 of the 45 Contracting Parties applying UN R46 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/113 by a vote of 34 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG/2017/2 | Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 46
GRSG-112-30 | Proposal for a Corrigendum to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 46
GRSG-112-08 | Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 46
Related discussions
17. Recalling the discussion in GRSG at its previous session, the expert from Germany introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/2 proposing to correct the provisions of paragraph 16.1.3.1. on the magnification factor. He also introduced GRSG-112-30 correcting a reference error in paragraph 6.3.3.2. The expert from France proposed to insert an editorial amendment to the communication form in Annex 4 (GRSG-112-08). GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/2 as amended below and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 5 to the 04 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
Paragraph 6.3.3.2., correct the reference to “paragraph 6.1.3.” to read “paragraph 6.1.1.3.”.
Annex 4, item 4., amend to read:
“4. Category of vehicle: (M1, M2, M3, N1, N2 ≤ 7.5 t, N2 > 7.5 t, N3, L) 2”
|
|
57 |
14881 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R49 Diesel/CNG/LNG Engine EmissionsWP.29/2017/129 | Proposal to correct and clarify the text, including to<ol class="alpha"><li>correct the constants for equation (34) to calculate exhaust mass flow using carbon balance method,</li><li>correct constants used for CVS verification,</li><li>correct the formula for regression analysis according to Annex 4, Appendix 3, and</li><li>correct the rise time (to 3.5 s from 2.5 s) for the PEM analyzers under paragraph A.2.2.1. of the 06 series.</li></ol> |
49 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to correct and clarify the text, including to - correct the constants for equation (34) to calculate exhaust mass flow using carbon balance method,
- correct constants used for CVS verification,
- correct the formula for regression analysis according to Annex 4, Appendix 3, and
- correct the rise time (to 3.5 s from 2.5 s) for the PEM analyzers under paragraph A.2.2.1. of the 06 series.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/129
|
|
Document date: 25 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 33 of the 44 Contracting Parties applying UN R49 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/129 by a vote of 33 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRPE-74-08 | Proposal for a new Supplement to the 05 and 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49
GRPE/2017/6 | Proposal for a new Supplement to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49
|
|
60 |
14927 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R49 Diesel/CNG/LNG Engine EmissionsWP.29/2017/130 | Proposal to introduce provisions to align UN R49 with recently introduced stage D EU legislation in order enable manufacturers to continue to utilize the provisions in paragraph 4 of Annex 9A to approve light commercial vehicles with a light duty OBD architecture under this regulation. This proposal incorporates all of the provisions of the latest amendment to EU legislation. As stage D is unrelated to OBD, the proposal is to make stage C and all subsequent stages equivalent to EOBD 6-2. The proposal corrects<ol class="alpha"><li>the constants for equation (34) to calculate exhaust mass flow using carbon balance method,</li><li>the constants used for CVS verification,</li><li>the formula for regression analysis according to Annex 4, Appendix 3, and</li><li>the rise time (to 3.5 s from 2.5 s) for the PEM analyzers under paragraph A.2.2.1. of the 06 series.</li></ol> |
49 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to introduce provisions to align UN R49 with recently introduced stage D EU legislation in order enable manufacturers to continue to utilize the provisions in paragraph 4 of Annex 9A to approve light commercial vehicles with a light duty OBD architecture under this regulation. This proposal incorporates all of the provisions of the latest amendment to EU legislation. As stage D is unrelated to OBD, the proposal is to make stage C and all subsequent stages equivalent to EOBD 6-2. The proposal corrects - the constants for equation (34) to calculate exhaust mass flow using carbon balance method,
- the constants used for CVS verification,
- the formula for regression analysis according to Annex 4, Appendix 3, and
- the rise time (to 3.5 s from 2.5 s) for the PEM analyzers under paragraph A.2.2.1. of the 06 series.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/130
|
|
Document date: 25 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 33 of the 44 Contracting Parties applying UN R49 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/130 by a vote of 33 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRPE/2017/6 | Proposal for a new Supplement to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49
GRPE-74-08 | Proposal for a new Supplement to the 05 and 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49
GRPE-75-26 | Proposal for amendments to document GRPE/2017/6 on a new Supplement to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49
GRPE-75-27 | Proposal for amendments to document GRPE/2017/6 on a new Supplement to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49
Related discussions
17. The expert from OICA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2017/6 on a proposal for a new Supplement to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49 in order to align it with the current state of the legislation of the European Union (EU). He recalled that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2017/6 had already been tabled at the last GRPE session. He also presented GRPE-75-26 and GRPE-75-27 introducing some changes to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2017/6. He explained that GRPE-75-26 aimed to fix the generally non-feasible urban window requirement to ensure the feasibility of the Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) test and that GRPE-75-27 intended to introduce missing On-Board Diagnostic systems (OBD) requirements.
18. The expert from Japan made a general comment on differences between traffic situations and he underlined the necessity to further discuss this topic. The expert from EC expressed his readiness to open discussions in the case that Japan would decide to become a Contracting Party to Regulation No. 49 in the future.
19. The expert from IANGV/NGV Global expressed his support to the proposals presented by OICA as GRPE-75-27 was fixing some concerns about the testing methodology.
20. The expert from OICA recalled GRPE-74-08 presented last session and aimed at correcting editorial errors in the 05 and 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49. He requested GRPE to consider the possibility to include GRPE-74-08 as part of the package to be voted of amendments to Regulation No. 49 at this session.
21. GRPE adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2017/6 amended by GRPE-74-08, GRPE-75-26 and GRPE-75-27 as reproduced in Addendum 1 to this report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and the Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement (AC.1) for consideration and vote at their November 2017 sessions as draft Supplement 5 to the 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49.
22. GRPE also adopted GRPE-74-08 as reproduced in Annex VI and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their November 2017 sessions as draft Supplement 9 to the 05 series of amendments to Regulation No. 49.
|
|
60 |
14928 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R110 CNG/LNG System ComponentsWP.29/2017/114 | Proposal to correct the definition of “manual valve”, including deletion of the phrase “rigidly fixed to the cylinder or tank”. The definition of the manual valve as part of the accessories fitted to the container or tank (para. 4.16.) is different from the definition specified in paragraph 4.22. The proposed editorial change aims at clarifying the text of these definitions. |
110 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to correct the definition of “manual valve”, including deletion of the phrase “rigidly fixed to the cylinder or tank”. The definition of the manual valve as part of the accessories fitted to the container or tank (para. 4.16.) is different from the definition specified in paragraph 4.22. The proposed editorial change aims at clarifying the text of these definitions.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/114
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 35 of the 48 Contracting Parties applying UN R110 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/114 by a vote of 35 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG/2017/4 | Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 110
Related discussions
29. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/4 aimed at correcting an error in the definitions related to the manual valve. GRSG noted a number of comments and adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/4 as reproduced below. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 7 to the 01 series of amendment and as draft Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 110, for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
Paragraph 4.16.1., amend to read:
“4.16.1. “Manual valve”: as defined in paragraph 4.22. that is rigidly fixed to the cylinder or tank."
Paragraph 4.16.3., amend to read:
“4.16.3. “Excess flow valve”: as defined in paragraph 4.21."
Paragraph 4.22., amend to read:
“4.22. “Manual valve” means a valve which is operated manually."
|
|
121 |
14892 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R110 CNG/LNG System ComponentsWP.29/2017/115 | Proposal to correct the definition of “manual valve”, including deletion of the phrase “rigidly fixed to the cylinder or tank”. The definition of the manual valve as part of the accessories fitted to the container or tank (para. 4.16.) is different from the definition specified in paragraph 4.22. The proposed editorial change aims at clarifying the text of these definitions.
The proposal also introduces provisions for cargo-compartment refrigeration systems connected to the compressed natural gas (CNG) and/or liquefied natural gas (LNG) system(s). |
110 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to correct the definition of “manual valve”, including deletion of the phrase “rigidly fixed to the cylinder or tank”. The definition of the manual valve as part of the accessories fitted to the container or tank (para. 4.16.) is different from the definition specified in paragraph 4.22. The proposed editorial change aims at clarifying the text of these definitions.
The proposal also introduces provisions for cargo-compartment refrigeration systems connected to the compressed natural gas (CNG) and/or liquefied natural gas (LNG) system(s).
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/115
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 35 of the 48 Contracting Parties applying UN R110 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/115 by a vote of 35 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG/2017/4 | Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 110
GRSG/2017/9 | Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 110
Related discussions
29. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/4 aimed at correcting an error in the definitions related to the manual valve. GRSG noted a number of comments and adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/4 as reproduced below. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 7 to the 01 series of amendment and as draft Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 110, for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
Paragraph 4.16.1., amend to read:
“4.16.1. “Manual valve”: as defined in paragraph 4.22. that is rigidly fixed to the cylinder or tank."
Paragraph 4.16.3., amend to read:
“4.16.3. “Excess flow valve”: as defined in paragraph 4.21."
Paragraph 4.22., amend to read:
“4.22. “Manual valve” means a valve which is operated manually."
30. The expert from France introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/9 incorporating provisions concerning refrigeration systems for cooling the cargo compartment which were connected to the CNG and/or LNG system. GRSG noted general support. GRSG adopted document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/9 as amended below. The secretariat was requested to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see para. 29 above) of draft Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 110 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
In paragraph 18.5.1.3., replace “GNC/GNL” to read “CNG/LNG” (twice).
|
|
121 |
14893 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R121 Hand Controls, Tell-tales and IndicatorsWP.29/2017/116 | Proposal to add a telltale and symbols for “Accident Emergency Call System (AECS)” and to align UN R121 with the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16:<ol class="alpha"><li>the term “seat belt” is replaced by “safety belt”,</li><li>the symbol for safety belt, defined in item 21 of Table 1 in the Regulation, may be displayed in different colours to convey different meanings. Therefore, the existing footnote 18 has been added to item 21, and</li><li>this symbol may be replaced by different symbols for seats other than those of the front row. Therefore, a new footnote 22 is added to item 21.</li></ol>In addition, paragraph 5.1.5. is modified and paragraph 5.1.7. introduced to take into consideration the content of GRSP/59, page 24, regarding paragraphs 8.4.3.2.1. and 8.4.4. on safety-belt reminders for occupants of rear seat row(s). This proposal does not change any of the technical requirements of UN R121. |
121 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to add a telltale and symbols for “Accident Emergency Call System (AECS)” and to align UN R121 with the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16: - the term “seat belt” is replaced by “safety belt”,
- the symbol for safety belt, defined in item 21 of Table 1 in the Regulation, may be displayed in different colours to convey different meanings. Therefore, the existing footnote 18 has been added to item 21, and
- this symbol may be replaced by different symbols for seats other than those of the front row. Therefore, a new footnote 22 is added to item 21.
In addition, paragraph 5.1.5. is modified and paragraph 5.1.7. introduced to take into consideration the content of GRSP/59, page 24, regarding paragraphs 8.4.3.2.1. and 8.4.4. on safety-belt reminders for occupants of rear seat row(s). This proposal does not change any of the technical requirements of UN R121.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/116
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 37 of the 51 Contracting Parties applying UN R121 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/116, as corrected by its Corr.1 per the session report,
by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG/2016/17 | Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121
GRSG/2017/5 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121
GRSG-112-23 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 121
WP.29/2017/116/Corr.1 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121
Related discussions
41. The expert from the Russian Federation recalled that the purpose of document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/17 was to insert into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale. GRSG noted an editorial correction to footnote 21 (replace ‘reoriented’ by ‘re-orientated’) and agreed to submit it to WP.29 in parallel with the new draft Regulation on AECS (paras. 44-48 below).
36. The expert from the Russian Federation reminded GRSG about the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/17 to insert into UN Regulation No. 121 a new symbol for the emergency call control and tell-tale. GRSG recalled its decision at its previous session to submit the proposal in parallel with the new draft UN Regulation on Accident Emergency Call Systems (AECS) (paras. 40 and 41 below) and requested the secretariat was to submit document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2016/17, as amended below, to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
In Table 1, footnote 21, replace ‘reoriented’ by ‘re-orientated’.
37. The expert from OICA presented GRSG-112-23 (superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/5) to align the provisions of UN Regulation No. 121 to those of the 07 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16 on safety belts. GRSG adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex IV to the session report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see para. 36 above) of draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 121 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
38. The expert from the Russian Federation underlined the need to correct the Russian version of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/5 in line with the English text (GRSG-112-25). GRSG requested the secretariat to take into account the correction of the Russian translation when preparing the above mentioned official document.
|
|
132 |
14878 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R121 Hand Controls, Tell-tales and IndicatorsWP.29/2017/116/Corr.1 | Proposal from the WP.29 Secretariat for additional corrections to the table of tell-tales, concerning items 31 (Combustion
pre-heat; engine start aid) and 32 (Choke (cold starting device)).
|
121 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal from the WP.29 Secretariat for additional corrections to the table of tell-tales, concerning items 31 (Combustion
pre-heat; engine start aid) and 32 (Choke (cold starting device)).
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/116/Corr.1
|
|
Document date: 14 Sep 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 37 of the 51 Contracting Parties applying UN R121 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/116/Corr.1 by a vote of 37 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2017/116 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 121
|
|
132 |
15031 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R129 Enhanced Child RestraintsWP.29/2017/124 | In order to facilitate the establishment of an International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, provisions concerning requirements for child restraint systems are being extracted from UN R14 into a new regulation. Therefore, this proposal would update the references to UN R14 in UN R129 to enable recognition of anchorage approvals under the adult safety belt regulation (UN R14 as amended) and the new child restraint anchorage regulation. |
129 |
|
Description
|
|
In order to facilitate the establishment of an International Whole Vehicle Type Approval, provisions concerning requirements for child restraint systems are being extracted from UN R14 into a new regulation. Therefore, this proposal would update the references to UN R14 in UN R129 to enable recognition of anchorage approvals under the adult safety belt regulation (UN R14 as amended) and the new child restraint anchorage regulation.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/124
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 37 of the 52 Contracting Parties applying UN R129 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/124 by a vote of 37 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-61-27 | Proposal for supplement 5 to the 00 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129
Related discussions
34. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11 to update the cross references to UN Regulation No. 14 and to the new UN Regulation on ISOFIX. He also presented GRSP-61-27 to introduce the same update to the original text of UN Regulation No. 129. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11, as amended by Annex VI and GRSP-61-27 as reproduced in Annex VI to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as: (i) draft Supplement 6 to UN Regulation No. 129 (GRSP-61-27), (ii) draft Supplement 3 to the 01 series and (iii) draft Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11).
|
|
164 |
14900 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R129 Enhanced Child RestraintsWP.29/2017/125 | Proposal to amend UN R129 in line with the proposal to amend UN R14 (document GRSP/2017/8) in order to separate child restraint provisions (including ISOFIX anchorage provisions) into a new UN Regulation. The ISOFIX amendment to UN R14 has been introduced to facilitate the establishment of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) regulation by limiting the scope of UN R14 to adult safety belts.
The proposal also incorporates amendments developed by the CRS informal working group to enable the type approval of integral and non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems equipped with an impact shield.
Lastly, the proposal would introduce a provision prohibiting the use of the Unique Identifier allowed under the Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement as an alternative to the current approval mark. In the case of child restraint systems, the approval mark contains important information for users. |
129 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to amend UN R129 in line with the proposal to amend UN R14 (document GRSP/2017/8) in order to separate child restraint provisions (including ISOFIX anchorage provisions) into a new UN Regulation. The ISOFIX amendment to UN R14 has been introduced to facilitate the establishment of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) regulation by limiting the scope of UN R14 to adult safety belts.
The proposal also incorporates amendments developed by the CRS informal working group to enable the type approval of integral and non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems equipped with an impact shield.
Lastly, the proposal would introduce a provision prohibiting the use of the Unique Identifier allowed under the Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement as an alternative to the current approval mark. In the case of child restraint systems, the approval mark contains important information for users.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/125
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 37 of the 52 Contracting Parties applying UN R129 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/125 by a vote of 37 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/11 | Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129
GRSP/2017/15 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129
GRSP/2017/4 | Collective amendments to Regulations Nos. 44 and 129
GRSP-61-15/Rev.1 | Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129
Related discussions
34. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11 to update the cross references to UN Regulation No. 14 and to the new UN Regulation on ISOFIX. He also presented GRSP-61-27 to introduce the same update to the original text of UN Regulation No. 129. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11, as amended by Annex VI and GRSP-61-27 as reproduced in Annex VI to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as: (i) draft Supplement 6 to UN Regulation No. 129 (GRSP-61-27), (ii) draft Supplement 3 to the 01 series and (iii) draft Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11).
35. The expert from France, Chair of the IWG on Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS), gave a presentation (GRSP-61-28) on the work progress of the IWG on amendments to the UN Regulation. He explained that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/15 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/16 were aimed, amongst others, at introducing provisions for ECRS equipped with impact shields as such restraint systems were not yet covered by the 01 and 02 series of amendments. The expert from CLEPA gave a presentation (GRSP-61-33) showing concerns on the proposals tabled by France. The expert from OICA raised concern on the increased head excursion (840 mm) during the dynamic test on rearward-facing CRS. The expert from France finally introduced GRSP-61-15-Rev.1 and GRSP-61-16-Rev.1 superseding respectively ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/15 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/16 and including the comments received. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/15 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/16 as amended by Annex VI to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see para. 34 above): (i) draft Supplement 3 to the 01 series (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/15) and (ii) Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/16).
44. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/4 to prevent the approval marking from being replaced by an Unique Identifier (UI) in UN Regulations Nos. 44 and 129. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/4 not amended. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see paras. 28, 29 and 30) of Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 44, as part of (see paras. 34 and 35) draft Supplement 3 to the 01 series and as part (see paras. 34 and 35) of Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129.
|
|
164 |
14901 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R129 Enhanced Child RestraintsWP.29/2017/126 | Proposal to amend UN R129 in line with the proposal to amend UN R14 (document GRSP/2017/8) in order to separate child restraint provisions (including ISOFIX anchorage provisions) into a new UN Regulation. The ISOFIX amendment to UN R14 has been introduced to facilitate the establishment of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) regulation by limiting the scope of UN R14 to adult safety belts.
The proposal also incorporates amendments developed by the CRS informal group to enable the type approval of integral and non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems equipped with an impact shield.
Lastly, the proposal introduces a provision to prohibit use of the Unique Identifier allowed under Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement as an alternative to the current approval mark. In the case of child restraint systems, the approval mark contains important information for users. |
129 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to amend UN R129 in line with the proposal to amend UN R14 (document GRSP/2017/8) in order to separate child restraint provisions (including ISOFIX anchorage provisions) into a new UN Regulation. The ISOFIX amendment to UN R14 has been introduced to facilitate the establishment of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) regulation by limiting the scope of UN R14 to adult safety belts.
The proposal also incorporates amendments developed by the CRS informal group to enable the type approval of integral and non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems equipped with an impact shield.
Lastly, the proposal introduces a provision to prohibit use of the Unique Identifier allowed under Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement as an alternative to the current approval mark. In the case of child restraint systems, the approval mark contains important information for users.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/126
|
|
Document date: 24 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 37 of the 52 Contracting Parties applying UN R129 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/126 by a vote of 37 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/11 | Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129
GRSP-61-27 | Proposal for supplement 5 to the 00 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129
GRSP/2017/16 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129
GRSP-61-16/Rev.1 | Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129
GRSP/2017/4 | Collective amendments to Regulations Nos. 44 and 129
Related discussions
34. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11 to update the cross references to UN Regulation No. 14 and to the new UN Regulation on ISOFIX. He also presented GRSP-61-27 to introduce the same update to the original text of UN Regulation No. 129. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11, as amended by Annex VI and GRSP-61-27 as reproduced in Annex VI to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as: (i) draft Supplement 6 to UN Regulation No. 129 (GRSP-61-27), (ii) draft Supplement 3 to the 01 series and (iii) draft Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/11).
35. The expert from France, Chair of the IWG on Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS), gave a presentation (GRSP-61-28) on the work progress of the IWG on amendments to the UN Regulation. He explained that ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/15 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/16 were aimed, amongst others, at introducing provisions for ECRS equipped with impact shields as such restraint systems were not yet covered by the 01 and 02 series of amendments. The expert from CLEPA gave a presentation (GRSP-61-33) showing concerns on the proposals tabled by France. The expert from OICA raised concern on the increased head excursion (840 mm) during the dynamic test on rearward-facing CRS. The expert from France finally introduced GRSP-61-15-Rev.1 and GRSP-61-16-Rev.1 superseding respectively ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/15 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/16 and including the comments received. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/15 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/16 as amended by Annex VI to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see para. 34 above): (i) draft Supplement 3 to the 01 series (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/15) and (ii) Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/16).
44. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/4 to prevent the approval marking from being replaced by an Unique Identifier (UI) in UN Regulations Nos. 44 and 129. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/4 not amended. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as part (see paras. 28, 29 and 30) of Supplement 13 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 44, as part of (see paras. 34 and 35) draft Supplement 3 to the 01 series and as part (see paras. 34 and 35) of Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 129.
|
|
164 |
14902 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R134 Hydrogen Fuel Cell SafetyWP.29/2017/127 | Proposal to<ol class="alpha"><li>align the regulation with legislation of the European Union, United States of America, and Japan,<li>clarify the test procedure, including ambient temperature provisions,</li><li>reduce unnecessary time and cost demands of the COP test procedures,</li><li>apply the minimum burst pressure BP<sub>min</sub> as the pressure limit in the hydrostatic pressure rupture test for COP batch testing, and</li><li>delete the phrase "and in no case less than the value necessary to meet the stress ratio requirements" erroneously introduced into paragraph 9.3.2.1.</li></ol> |
134 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to - align the regulation with legislation of the European Union, United States of America, and Japan,
- clarify the test procedure, including ambient temperature provisions,
- reduce unnecessary time and cost demands of the COP test procedures,
- apply the minimum burst pressure BPmin as the pressure limit in the hydrostatic pressure rupture test for COP batch testing, and
- delete the phrase “and in no case less than the value necessary to meet the stress ratio requirements” erroneously introduced into paragraph 9.3.2.1.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/127
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 38 of the 53 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/127 by a vote of 38 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/5 | Draft Supplement 3 to Regulation No. 134
Related discussions
39. GRSP noted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/5 tabled by the expert from Japan proposing improvements to the test requirements. GRSP adopted the proposal as amended by Annex VII to the report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 3 to UN Regulation No. 134.
|
|
195 |
14903 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R17 Strength of SeatsWP.29/2017/121 | Proposal to correct the reference to paragraph 5.1.3. in paragraph 5.2.3.2. to read 5.2.3. |
17 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to correct the reference to paragraph 5.1.3. in paragraph 5.2.3.2. to read 5.2.3.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/121
|
|
Document date: 23 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 35 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R17 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/121 by a vote of 35 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-61-10 | Proposal for a corrigendum to UN Regulation No. 17
Related discussions
21. The expert from OICA introduced GRSP-61-10 to correct a reference. GRSP adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex IV to this report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal as draft Corrigendum 1 to the Revision 5 to UN Regulation No. 17, for consideration and vote at the November 2017 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
|
28 |
14896 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R43 Safety GlazingWP.29/2017/112 | Proposal for editorial corrections to align the definition on plastic glazing between the original English version and the French translation as well as of the communication annex on principal/secondary characteristics for laminated-glass windscreens. |
43 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal for editorial corrections to align the definition on plastic glazing between the original English version and the French translation as well as of the communication annex on principal/secondary characteristics for laminated-glass windscreens.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/112
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 35 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R43 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/112 by a vote of 35 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG-112-07/Rev.1 | Proposal for Corrigendum 6 to Revision 3 of Regulation No. 43
Related discussions
13. The expert from France proposed to align the French and English version of Revision 3 of UN Regulation No. 43 (GRSG-112-07-Rev.1). GRSG adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex II to this report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as Corrigendum 6 to Revision 3 and as Corrigendum 1 to Revision 4 of UN Regulation No. 43 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
|
|
54 |
14880 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R43 Safety GlazingWP.29/2017/117 | Proposal for editorial corrections to align the definition on plastic glazing between the original English version and the French translation as well as of the communication annex on principal/secondary characteristics for laminated-glass windscreens. |
43 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal for editorial corrections to align the definition on plastic glazing between the original English version and the French translation as well as of the communication annex on principal/secondary characteristics for laminated-glass windscreens.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/117
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 35 of the 47 Contracting Parties applying UN R43 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/117 by a vote of 35 in favor,
0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG-112-07/Rev.1 | Proposal for Corrigendum 6 to Revision 3 of Regulation No. 43
Related discussions
13. The expert from France proposed to align the French and English version of Revision 3 of UN Regulation No. 43 (GRSG-112-07-Rev.1). GRSG adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex II to this report and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as Corrigendum 6 to Revision 3 and as Corrigendum 1 to Revision 4 of UN Regulation No. 43 for consideration at their November 2017 sessions.
|
|
54 |
14877 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R0 International Whole Vehicle Type ApprovalWP.29/2017/108 | Proposal submitted by the informal working group on the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval for the establishment of UN Regulation No. 0 regarding the approval of whole vehicles within the framework of the 1958 Agreement. The regulations would establish an International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) scheme whereby Contracting Parties adhering to the Regulation may issue approvals to either a limited level (L-IWVTA) or to a wider range of technical topics included in the universal level (U-IWVTA). Contracting Parties are able to apply the limited or universal IWVTA depending upon the national situation.
The Universal-IWVTA (U-IWVTA) provides a greater level of certainty for vehicle manufacturers and Contracting Parties applying this UN Regulation, as the approval has to be accepted without further assessment of the technical items covered by the U-IWVTA issued. Contracting Parties applying this UN Regulation are not obliged to accept approvals to the limited level (L-IWVTA) but may do so at their choice. However, they have also to accept approvals issued pursuant to U-IWVTA.
The UN Regulation includes the administrative obligations of the IWVTA scheme. It does not establish separate technical requirements but instead refers to the provisions of the separate UN Regulations. |
0 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal submitted by the informal working group on the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval for the establishment of UN Regulation No. 0 regarding the approval of whole vehicles within the framework of the 1958 Agreement. The regulations would establish an International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) scheme whereby Contracting Parties adhering to the Regulation may issue approvals to either a limited level (L-IWVTA) or to a wider range of technical topics included in the universal level (U-IWVTA). Contracting Parties are able to apply the limited or universal IWVTA depending upon the national situation.
The Universal-IWVTA (U-IWVTA) provides a greater level of certainty for vehicle manufacturers and Contracting Parties applying this UN Regulation, as the approval has to be accepted without further assessment of the technical items covered by the U-IWVTA issued. Contracting Parties applying this UN Regulation are not obliged to accept approvals to the limited level (L-IWVTA) but may do so at their choice. However, they have also to accept approvals issued pursuant to U-IWVTA.
The UN Regulation includes the administrative obligations of the IWVTA scheme. It does not establish separate technical requirements but instead refers to the provisions of the separate UN Regulations.
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/108
|
|
Document date: 18 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 39 of the Contracting Parties applying UN R0 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/108 by a vote of 38 in favor,
0 opposed, with 1 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2017/104 | Draft UN Regulation No. 0 on uniform provisions concerning International Whole Vehicle Type Approval
Related discussions
173rd WP.29 session (14-17
Nov 2017)
55. The representative of Japan, Chair of the IWG on IWVTA, introduced the draft UN Regulation No. 0 on uniform provisions concerning the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/108). He reported on the latest amendments to Annex 4 listing the UN Regulations covered by IWVTA (WP.29-173-18). He highlighted that other UN Regulations were in the process of being reviewed by the relevant Working Parties and that would be included in near future. Thus, he presented the draft Terms of References and Rules of Procedure for Phase 2 of the IWG on IWVTA (WP.29-173-17).
56. WP.29 welcomed the submission of draft UN Regulation No. 0 and acknowledged the work progress made by the IWG. The World Forum considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/108 and recommended its submission to AC.1 for voting.
74. The representative of the Republic of Korea announced his intention to abstain from voting at AC.1 on document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/108 (new UN Regulation on IWVTA).
56. The representative of Japan, on behalf of the Chair of the IWG on IWVTA introduced the Draft UN Regulation No. 0 on uniform provisions concerning International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/104) and the latest amendments to its Annex 4 listing UN Regulations covered by the IWVTA (WP.29-172-12). He highlighted other UN Regulations to be reviewed by the relevant GR before they may be included in the annex, namely UN Regulations Nos. 14, 34, 116, 129 and the future UN Regulation on implementing the Worldwide Light-Duty Test Procedures (WLTP). WP.29 agreed to keep the document on the agenda for its November 2017 session for consideration and adoption.
57. He further introduced a tentative draft of the Rules of Procedures and the Terms of Reference (WP.29-172-14) for the future work of the IWG on IWVTA Phase 2. WP.29 asked to keep the document on the agenda for its November 2017 session for consideration and adoption.
|
|
145 |
14872 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R144 Accident Emergency Call SystemsWP.29/2017/132 | |
144 |
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/132
|
|
Document date: 28 Jul 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 38 of the Contracting Parties applying UN R144 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/132 by a vote of 37 in favor,
1 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSG/2017/12 | Proposal for amendments to the new draft Regulation on Accident Emergency Call Systems
GRSG-112-42 | Draft Regulation on Accident Emergency Call Systems
Related discussions
40. The expert from the Russian Federation, chairing the IWG on AECS, presented an updated proposal of draft UN Regulation on AECS (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/12). As Secretary of the IWG on AECS, the expert from OICA introduced GRSG-112-15 proposing some further editorial corrections to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/12. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRSG-112-27 clarifying mainly the scope and definitions of the draft UN Regulation. She informed GRSG that from, a technical point of view, the corridor of sled pulse (60g) specified in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/12 was severe enough, but taking into account the importance and urgency for the adoption of the new UN Regulation by all Contracting Parties, the Russian Federation would support the more stringent corridor (65g) in line with the EU legislation. The expert from OICA reiterated a concern about the economic burden for technical services and laboratories offering the more stringent tests due to the considerable costs of test equipment performing such acceleration/declaration of 65g.
41. Following a detailed consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2017/12, GRSG adopted the new UN Regulation on AECS as reproduced in GRSG-112-42, subject to a final review at its October 2017 session of the official translations into the French and Russian languages. The GRSG Chair thanked again for the excellent work done by the IWG and for the acceptance by the Russian Federation to support the final proposal. The secretariat was requested to submit the adopted proposal to WP.29 and AC.1 as new draft UN Regulation on AECS for consideration at their November 2017 sessions, subject to a final review at the forthcoming GRSG session.
|
|
192 |
14822 |
932 |
|
|
|
| UN R145 ISOFIX anchorage systemsWP.29/2017/133 | Proposal to consolidate provisions concerning ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions removed from Regulation No. 14 in a new regulation. This change removes obstacles to the inclusion of UN R14 into Annex 4 of the future UN Regulation No. 0 of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA). |
145 |
|
Description
|
|
Proposal to consolidate provisions concerning ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions removed from Regulation No. 14 in a new regulation. This change removes obstacles to the inclusion of UN R14 into Annex 4 of the future UN Regulation No. 0 of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA).
|
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2017/133
|
|
Document date: 24 Aug 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted
|
|
With 38 of the Contracting Parties applying UN R145 present
and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/133 by a vote of 37 in favor,
0 opposed, with 1 abstaining.
|
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2017/7 | Draft new Regulation on ISOFIX anchorage systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions
GRSP-61-11 | Regulation 14 and New ISOFIX Regulation: List of other affected UN Regulations
Related discussions
173rd WP.29 session (14-17
Nov 2017)
76. The representative of Australia announced his intention to abstain from voting at AC.1 on document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/133 (new UN Regulation on ISOFIX).
45. The expert from OICA introduced the draft new UN Regulation (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/7) on ISOFIX. He also provided for information the list of UN Regulations (GRSP-61-11) affected by the splitting of UN Regulation No. 14. He also introduced GRSP-61-06-Rev.1, amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2017/7. GRSP adopted the proposal as amended by Annex VIII to the report for submission to WP.29 in November 2017.
46. Finally, GRSP agreed to keep GRSP-58-13 as a reference in the agenda of the next session for possible future discussion on harmonization of requirements on ISOFIX.
|
|
229 |
14905 |
932 |
|
|
|