Proposal for amendments to the draft Regulation on Tyre Pressure Monitoring System
(ETRTO)
Proposal for amendments to the draft Regulation on Tyre Pressure Monitoring System
|
Description
|
Proposal for a minor editorial correction to the text. Paragraph 4.8. should read “Annex 2 to this Regulation gives an example of approval marks.” The current text refers to “examples” where there is only one provided.
|
Submitted by: ETRTO
|
Date: 07 Jul 16
|
Status: Approved by GR
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
38. The Chair recalled that GRRF already supported ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/44 with editorial corrections and that this document was kept on the agenda, awaiting substantive proposals to be considered at the coming session.
40. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/44 as well as ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/21 amended as draft Supplement 1 to Regulation No. 142, for consideration and vote by WP.29 and AC.1 at their March 2018 sessions.
|
GRRF/2016/44
|
08 Jul 2016
|
Working Party
|
Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems
Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their tyre pressure monitoring systems
|
Proposal for a minor editorial correction to the text. Paragraph 4.8. should read "Annex 2 to this Regulation gives an example of approval marks." The current text refers to "examples" where there is only one provided.
|
GRRF/2016/0044
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
(CLEPA)
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
Description
|
UN R13 allows for the exemption of certain vehicles from the requirement for electronic stability controls (footnote 12). This proposal (following proposals GRRF/2016/27 as amended by GRRF-82-03 and proposal GRRF-83-31) seeks to clarify the scope of the exemptions to include any special purpose vehicle with a non-standard chassis. The change was prompted by a modified vehicle where use of ESC was not feasible, but where the current UN R13 language left doubt as to whether the ESC requirement was applicable.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 05 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF-83-31 | Proposal for amendments to Footnote 12 in Regulation No. 13
GRRF/2016/27 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
GRRF-82-03 | Proposal for amendments to Regulations No. 13
WP.29/2018/9 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 15 to the 11 series of amendments
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
13. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/11 with a clarification of Footnote 12. GRRF adopted this proposal.
15. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit the three official documents above as draft Supplement 15 to the 11 series of amendments to Regulation No. 13 for consideration and vote by WP.29 and AC.1 at their March 2018 session.
13. The expert from CLEPA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/27, as amended by GRRF-82-03. GRRF supported the aim of this proposal. The proposal received several comments of editorial nature. GRRF agreed to keep both documents on the agenda of the next GRRF session.
14. The expert from CLEPA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/27, as amended by GRRF-82-03. Following discussions, the experts from the European Commission and from CLEPA presented GRRF-83-31. GRRF agreed to resume consideration of this subject and requested the secretariat to distribute this informal document with an official symbol at its September 2017 session.
90. In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/9, Annex 21, paragraph 2.1.4., second subparagraph, amend to read:
“Additionally, interventions by systems related to the vehicle stability function (including traction control, trailer stability assist, corner brake control, other similar functions that use throttle individual torque control to operate and share common components with vehicle stability function, and ESC or VSF intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability) may also be indicated to the driver by this flashing optical warning signal.”
|
GRRF/2017/11
|
05 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking
Heavy-Duty Braking
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles of Categories M, N and O with regard to Braking
|
UN R13 allows for the exemption of certain vehicles from the requirement for electronic stability controls (footnote 12). This proposal (following proposals GRRF/2016/27 as amended by GRRF-82-03 and proposal GRRF-83-31) seeks to clarify the scope of the exemptions to include any special purpose vehicle with a non-standard chassis. The change was prompted by a modified vehicle where use of ESC was not feasible, but where the current UN R13 language left doubt as to whether the ESC requirement was applicable.
|
GRRF/2017/0011
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
(France and Germany)
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
|
Description
|
Proposal to simplify the verification of the sufficient movement on the balancer without having to take measurements underneath the trailer in a potentially unsafe position.
|
Submitted by: France and Germany
|
Date: 07 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF/2016/26 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13
GRRF-83-07 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13, Annex 12
GRRF-84-04 | Amendments to the Justification part in document GRRF/2017/12 (UN R13)
WP.29/2018/9 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 15 to the 11 series of amendments
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
14. The expert from Germany introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/12 as amended by GRRF-84-04 (Justification), clarifying the verification of the sufficient movement on the balancer without having to take measurements underneath the trailer in a potentially unsecure position. GRRF adopted this proposal.
15. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit the three official documents above as draft Supplement 15 to the 11 series of amendments to Regulation No. 13 for consideration and vote by WP.29 and AC.1 at their March 2018 session.
12. The expert from France introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/26 proposing amendments to Annex 12 of Regulation No. 13. The proposal received a general support. The expert from Germany noted that some modifications of editorial nature might be necessary. GRRF agreed to revisit this item at its next session, on the basis of a revised proposal, that the experts from France and Germany volunteered to prepare.
15. The expert from Germany presented GRRF-83-07 based on ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2016/26, originally tabled by the expert from France. GRRF noted that the proposed amendment to para. 2.2.18. in Annex 12 already existed and the wording proposed could be clarified. GRRF agreed to resume consideration of this proposal on the basis of an official working document that the experts from Germany and France volunteered to prepare.
90. In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/9, Annex 21, paragraph 2.1.4., second subparagraph, amend to read:
“Additionally, interventions by systems related to the vehicle stability function (including traction control, trailer stability assist, corner brake control, other similar functions that use throttle individual torque control to operate and share common components with vehicle stability function, and ESC or VSF intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability) may also be indicated to the driver by this flashing optical warning signal.”
|
GRRF/2017/12
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking
Heavy-Duty Braking
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles of Categories M, N and O with regard to Braking
|
Proposal to simplify the verification of the sufficient movement on the balancer without having to take measurements underneath the trailer in a potentially unsafe position.
|
GRRF/2017/0012
|
Proposal for a new Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of agricultural vehicles
Proposal for a new Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of agricultural vehicles
|
Description
|
Proposal from the informal working group on Agricultural Couplings.
|
Date: 07 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF-81-10 | Proposal for a new UN Regulation No. 55-A concerning agricultural vehicle couplings
ACDC-06-01 | GRRF comments on draft agricultural couplings regulation
GRRF/2018/4 | Proposal for a new Regulation on agricultural vehicle couplings
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
17. The Chair of the IWG on the Agricultural Coupling Devices and Components reported on the activities of the group (GRRF-84-27) and presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/13 as amended by GRRF-84-26 with a draft regulation on the Agricultural Coupling. GRRF discussed the texts of para. 4.5. contained in square brackets and requested the group to consider working protection laws. The expert from Sweden proposed to clarify the provisions for remote coupling and remote indication. GRRF agreed that the remote indication should be located where the remote operation takes place. The Chair of the IWG volunteered to submit a revised proposal at the February 2018 session of GRRF.
19. The expert from Germany introduced GRRF-81-09 proposing ToR for a new IWG on Agricultural Coupling that would remove the Agricultural Coupling provisions from Regulation No. 55 and would include them in a new Regulation. The proposal received some comments to limit the number of classes, as reproduced in GRRF-81-09-Rev.1. GRRF agreed with the proposal for a new IWG that would take into consideration the work done by the Task Force on Agricultural Couplings (GRRF-81-10). GRRF agreed in principle with the proposal of the expert from Spain proposing generic provisions to be defined, which could be used for the approval of specific agricultural coupling at the national level. The secretariat noted that GRRF-81-10 was based on a former version of Regulation No. 55 and proposed that the new IWG on Agricultural Coupling would take into consideration the latest version of Regulation No. 55. GRRF agreed that the expert from Germany would chair the IWG and that the expert from the Comité Européen des groupements de constructeurs du machinisme agricole (CEMA) would provide the secretariat of the group. GRRF requested that the IWG would first revise and clarify the ToR of the group.
17. The Chair of the IWG on the Agricultural Coupling Devices and Components reported on the activities of the group (GRRF-86-06) and presented GRRF-86-02, introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2018/4 with a draft Regulation on the Agricultural Coupling. GRRF received information on the texts of para. 4.5.
18. GRRF agreed that the stress weld limit should be qualified as absolute. It adopted the document and requested the secretariat make the necessary change and to submit the proposal as new draft UN Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of agricultural vehicles to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2018 sessions.
|
GRRF/2017/13
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Mechanical coupling components for agricultural vehicles
Agricultural vehicle couplings
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Mechanical Coupling Components of Combinations of Agricultural Vehicles
|
Proposal from the informal working group on Agricultural Couplings.
|
GRRF/2017/0013
|
Proposal for amendments to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 78
(IMMA)
Proposal for amendments to the 04 series of amendments to Regulation No. 78
|
Description
|
Regulation No. 53 currently allows for the activation of the stop lamp by application of the brakes only. As already presented at a session of the Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE) (see ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRE/2015/42), IMMA is proposing to introduce the activation of stop lamps under more conditions than the application of the service brake only, e.g. also by regenerative braking. As noted in the report of seventy-fourth session of GRE, see ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRE/74, para. 30: “the proposal might need to be accompanied by a modification of Regulation No. 78 under GRRF.” Therefore, IMMA has prepared this proposal for Regulation No. 78. A revised corresponding proposal on Regulation No. 53 will also be submitted to the October 2017 session of GRE.
|
Submitted by: IMMA
|
Date: 05 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRE/2015/42 | Proposal for Supplement 18 to the 01 series of amendments to Regulation No. 53
GRE/2017/25 | Proposal for Supplement 20 to the 01 series of amendments and for Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 53
GRRF-84-13 | Proposal for amendments to GRRF/2017/14 (UN R78)
GRRF-86-35 | UN R78: Proposal for amendments
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
21. The expert from IMMA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/14 as amended GRRF-84-13 with provisions allowing additional conditions for the activation of the stop lamp. The expert from Canada recommended addressing this question within GTR No. 3. The Chair noted that ETRTO would not be allowed to propose amendments to GTR No. 3 and asked whether a Contracting Party to the 1998 Agreement could sponsor this amendment. GRRF raised the question why the author of the proposal selected provisions from Regulation No. 13 and not from Regulation No. 13-H. The expert from IMMA agreed to submit a revised proposal for the February 2018 session of GRRF.
30. The expert from IMMA introduced a proposal allowing for the use of different brake lamp activation methods and aligning the brake lamp provision with those applicable for four-wheelers (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2015/42). The experts of France, Germany, Italy and Japan delivered remarks. GRE noted that this proposal might need to be accompanied by a modification of Regulation No. 78 under the responsibility of the Working Party on Braking and Running Gear (GRRF). IMMA was invited to contact GRRF and to present an updated document for the next session.
30. The expert from IMMA proposed to allow the use of different activation methods for stop lamps, and to align the stop lamp provisions with those applicable for four-wheelers (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2017/25 and GRE-78-07). GRE noted that a corresponding proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 78 had been submitted to the Working Party on Braking and Running Gear (GRRF). The experts from Finland, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and UK commented on the proposal. The Chair invited the expert of IMMA to update the proposal based on the comments received. GRE decided to consider an updated proposal at the next session that would include the issue of its legal form (supplement or a new series of amendments).
22. The expert from IMMA introduced GRRF-86-35 with provisions allowing additional conditions for the activation of the stop lamp. The proposal received some comments. GRRF noted that some conditions were related to regenerative braking and, therefore, GRRF recommended to explore corresponding provisions in UN Regulations Nos. 13 and 13-H on the braking performance of regenerative braking and to complement the proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 78 with corresponding provision, not only addressing brake light activation requirements. GRRF noted the potential need to clarify the need of the word “instantaneous” in para. 5.1.16. The expert from IMMA agreed to submit a revised proposal for the September 2018 session of GRRF.
|
GRRF/2017/14
|
05 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Motorcycle and Moped Braking
Motorcycle Braking
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles of Categories L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 with regard to Braking
|
Regulation No. 53 currently allows for the activation of the stop lamp by application of the brakes only. As already presented at a session of the Working Party on Lighting and Light-Signalling (GRE) (see ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRE/2015/42), IMMA is proposing to introduce the activation of stop lamps under more conditions than the application of the service brake only, e.g. also by regenerative braking. As noted in the report of seventy-fourth session of GRE, see ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRE/74, para. 30: "the proposal might need to be accompanied by a modification of Regulation No. 78 under GRRF." Therefore, IMMA has prepared this proposal for Regulation No. 78. A revised corresponding proposal on Regulation No. 53 will also be submitted to the October 2017 session of GRE.
|
GRRF/2017/0014
|
Proposal to amend Global Technical Regulation No. 3
(Italy)
Proposal to amend Global Technical Regulation No. 3
|
Description
|
Proposal to align GTR No. 3 with technical progress, addressing among others: electromagnetic compatibility/immunity of ABS-systems, ABS performance requirements for category 3-5 vehicles (three-wheelers), uniform requirements for equipment such Emergency Stop Signal and the means to disable the ABS, if equipped. This amendment aims to harmonize GTR with recent amendments made to UN Regulation No. 78 while addressing its use under self-certification compliance systems.
|
Submitted by: Italy
|
Date: 05 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF-83-09 | Proposal for Amend. [3] to GTR No. 3
GRRF-83-10 | Proposal for amendments to GRRF-83-09 on amending GTR No. 3
GRRF/2017/16 | Report on draft Amendment 3 to global technical regulation No. 3
GRRF-86-10 | GTR 3: Revised proposal for Amendment 3
GRVA/2018/9 | GTR 3: Proposal for an amendment
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
18. The expert from Italy introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/15 with provisions aimed at aligning the text of UN GTR No. 3 and UN Regulation No. 78 especially on tri-cycles Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS), Emergency Stop Signal and means to disable the ABS function (‘ABS switch’), prepared in collaboration with the expert from IMMA. The expert from Canada answered to the proposal (GRRF-84-10). The expert from Italy presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/16 with the report on the activities related to the amendment proposal to UN GTR No.3. The expert from India informed GRRF about regulatory activities in his Country on the obligation to install ABS on new motorcycle with an engine capacity of 125 cm3 and more.
19. GRRF recommended the expert from Italy to keep the draft amendment to GTR No. 3 as harmonized as possible with UN Regulation No. 78 especially with regard to the ABS switch to avoid subsequent amendments to UN Regulation No. 78.
20. The expert from Italy agreed to submit a revised proposal for the February 2018 session of GRRF.
24. The expert from Italy introduced GRRF-83-09 proposing to insert in Global Technical Regulation (GTR) No. 3 (Motorcycle braking) provisions on tri-cycles Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS), Emergency Stop Signal and means to disable the ABS function (‘ABS switch’) prepared in collaboration with the expert from IMMA. He informed GRRF on the related discussion at the Executive Committee AC.3 in November 2016 that agreed in principle with the proposal to align GTR No. 3 and Regulation No. 78. The expert from Canada answered to the proposal (GRRF-83-10). The GRRF agreed to resume consideration of these proposals on the basis of an official working document that the experts from Canada and Italy volunteered to prepare.
21. The expert from Italy withdrew GRRF-86-10 and GRRF-86-11.
50. GRVA agreed with the suggestion of expert from Italy to postpone the consideration of this item until the January 2019 session.
|
GRRF/2017/15
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Motorcycle Brake Systems
Motorcycle Brakes
Global Technical Regulation No. 3: Motorcycle Brake Systems
|
Proposal to align GTR No. 3 with technical progress, addressing among others: electromagnetic compatibility/immunity of ABS-systems, ABS performance requirements for category 3-5 vehicles (three-wheelers), uniform requirements for equipment such Emergency Stop Signal and the means to disable the ABS, if equipped. This amendment aims to harmonize GTR with recent amendments made to UN Regulation No. 78 while addressing its use under self-certification compliance systems.
|
GRRF/2017/0015
|
Report on draft Amendment 3 to global technical regulation No. 3
(Italy)
Report on draft Amendment 3 to global technical regulation No. 3
|
Description
|
Technical report to accompany the proposal for amendment 3 (concerning mainly ABS issues) to GTR 3.
|
Submitted by: Italy
|
Date: 05 Jul 17
|
Status: Formal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF/2017/15 | Proposal to amend Global Technical Regulation No. 3
GRRF-86-11 | GTR 3: Revised report on Amendment 3
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
18. The expert from Italy introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/15 with provisions aimed at aligning the text of UN GTR No. 3 and UN Regulation No. 78 especially on tri-cycles Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS), Emergency Stop Signal and means to disable the ABS function (‘ABS switch’), prepared in collaboration with the expert from IMMA. The expert from Canada answered to the proposal (GRRF-84-10). The expert from Italy presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/16 with the report on the activities related to the amendment proposal to UN GTR No.3. The expert from India informed GRRF about regulatory activities in his Country on the obligation to install ABS on new motorcycle with an engine capacity of 125 cm3 and more.
19. GRRF recommended the expert from Italy to keep the draft amendment to GTR No. 3 as harmonized as possible with UN Regulation No. 78 especially with regard to the ABS switch to avoid subsequent amendments to UN Regulation No. 78.
20. The expert from Italy agreed to submit a revised proposal for the February 2018 session of GRRF.
21. The expert from Italy withdrew GRRF-86-10 and GRRF-86-11.
|
GRRF/2017/16
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Motorcycle Brake Systems
Motorcycle Brakes
Global Technical Regulation No. 3: Motorcycle Brake Systems
|
Technical report to accompany the proposal for amendment 3 (concerning mainly ABS issues) to GTR 3.
|
GRRF/2017/0016
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 30
(ETRTO)
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 30
|
Description
|
Proposal to update a cross-reference in paragraph 3.4. to read “3.1.2” pursuant to the earlier division of paragraph 3.1 into separate paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.1.2.
|
Submitted by: ETRTO
|
Date: 05 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2018/10 | UN R30: Proposal for Supplement 20 to the 02 series of amendments
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
27. The expert from ETRTO introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/17 as amended by GRRF-84-15 with editorial corrections. GRRF adopted the proposal as amended by Annex III as draft Supplement 19 to Regulation No. 30 and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2018 sessions.
|
GRRF/2017/17
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Pneumatic Tires
Pneumatic Tires
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Pneumatic Tyres for Motor Vehicles and their Trailers
|
Proposal to update a cross-reference in paragraph 3.4. to read "3.1.2" pursuant to the earlier division of paragraph 3.1 into separate paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.1.2.
|
GRRF/2017/0017
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 54
(ETRTO)
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 54
|
Description
|
Proposal to - correct the references to paragraph 3.17 in paragraph 3.1.12. to refer to 3.20
- update a cross-reference in paragraph 3.4 to read “3.1.2.” pursuant to the earlier division of paragraph 3.1 into paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.1.2. (consistent with UN R30)
- delete the superfluous reference to paragraph 2.19 in paragraph. 4.1.1. (consistent with UN R30)
- delete the word “existing” from paras. 6.1.1.2. and 6.1.2.2. (consistent with all the other tyre UN Regulations)
- amend paragraph 6.1.4.2. to take into account the requirements for size designations in Annex 5
- add a footnote to Annex 5, Part II, Table B to introduce the appropriate formulae in the Regulation (instead of Annex 5)
- add a size in Annex 5, Part II, Table C for an old size that does not follow the guidelines/formulae applicable for high flotation tyres.
|
Submitted by: ETRTO
|
Date: 05 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF-84-16 | Proposal for amendments to GRRF/2017/18 (UN R54)
GRRF-84-34 | Addendum to document GRRF/2017/18
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
28. The expert from ETRTO introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/18 as amended by GRRF-84-16 with editorial correction and a number of imperial tyre sizes updated in Annex 5.
29. GRRF agreed to adopt the proposed amendment to paragraph 3.4. (based on GRRF‑84-34) as reproduced below:
Paragraph 3.4., amend to read: "3.4. | The markings referred to in paragraph 3.1. and the approval mark prescribed in paragraph 5.4. of this Regulation shall be moulded on to or into the tyres. They shall be clearly legible and shall, except for the marking referred to in paragraphs 3.1.1., 3.1.2. and 3.1.13. above, be located on at least one lower sidewall." |
30. The expert from ETRTO volunteered to prepare a revised proposal for the February 2018 session of GRRF to address the comments received on some provisions proposed in ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRRF/2017/18.
|
GRRF/2017/18
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Commercial Vehicle Tyres
CV Tires
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Pneumatic Tyres for Commercial Vehicles and their Trailers
|
Proposal to<ol class="alpha"><li>correct the references to paragraph 3.17 in paragraph 3.1.12. to refer to 3.20</li><li>update a cross-reference in paragraph 3.4 to read "3.1.2." pursuant to the earlier division of paragraph 3.1 into paragraphs 3.1.1. and 3.1.2. (consistent with UN R30)</li><li>delete the superfluous reference to paragraph 2.19 in paragraph. 4.1.1. (consistent with UN R30)</li><li>delete the word "existing" from paras. 6.1.1.2. and 6.1.2.2. (consistent with all the other tyre UN Regulations)</li><li>amend paragraph 6.1.4.2. to take into account the requirements for size designations in Annex 5</li><li>add a footnote to Annex 5, Part II, Table B to introduce the appropriate formulae in the Regulation (instead of Annex 5)</li><li>add a size in Annex 5, Part II, Table C for an old size that does not follow the guidelines/formulae applicable for high flotation tyres.</li></ol>
|
GRRF/2017/0018
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 106
(ETRTO)
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 106
|
Description
|
Proposal to - amend para 6.1.2. to align the wording to the headers in Annex 5 and to correct the reference to the footnote
- amend para 6.2.1. to restore corrent references after renumbering made during recent Supplements
- amend Annex 5, Table 5 to add the value for the Overall diameter (D) in column (*) that applies to tyres marked with classification code “I-3”.
- amend Annex 5, Table 6, Note 1 to clarify use of the ‘IMP’ and ‘IND’ suffixes for agricultural implements and construction vehicles, respectively.
- add a footnote to Annex 5, Table 7 is the to introduce the appropriate formulae in the Regulation (instead of via Annex 5)
- correct cross-references in Annex 7 following the introduction of three new paragraphs in Supplement 15
- amend Annex 7, Part A to conform with Tire and Rim Association (TRA) specifications for code designated diagonal tyres with speed symbol A8.
|
Submitted by: ETRTO
|
Date: 06 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF/2018/6 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 106
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
32. The expert from ETRTO introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/18 as complemented by GRRF-84-17 proposing the addition of a number of tyre sizes. The expert from ETRTO volunteered to prepare a revised proposal addressing the comments received for the February 2018 session of GRRF.
32. The expert from ETRTO introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2018/6 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2018/7 (amended by GRRF-86-31) with tyre sizes and tyre classification codes common in the United States of America and standardised by the Tire and Rim Association Inc. and with marking provisions on inflation pressure (for measurements and tests). He also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2018/12 as a consolidated version of UN Regulation No. 106, containing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2018/6 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2018/7. GRRF adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2018/12 as amended and reproduced in Addendum 2 (based on GRRF-86-42) to the report. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit this amended proposal as draft Supplement 16 to UN Regulation No. 106 to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2018 sessions.
|
GRRF/2017/19
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Tires for Agricultural Vehicles
Agricultural Tires
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Pneumatic Tyres for Agricultural Vehicles and their Trailers
|
Proposal to<ol class="alpha"><li>amend para 6.1.2. to align the wording to the headers in Annex 5 and to correct the reference to the footnote</li><li>amend para 6.2.1. to restore corrent references after renumbering made during recent Supplements</li><li>amend Annex 5, Table 5 to add the value for the Overall diameter (D) in column (*) that applies to tyres marked with classification code "I-3".</li><li>amend Annex 5, Table 6, Note 1 to clarify use of the 'IMP' and 'IND' suffixes for agricultural implements and construction vehicles, respectively.</li><li>add a footnote to Annex 5, Table 7 is the to introduce the appropriate formulae in the Regulation (instead of via Annex 5)</li><li>correct cross-references in Annex 7 following the introduction of three new paragraphs in Supplement 15</li><li>amend Annex 7, Part A to conform with Tire and Rim Association (TRA) specifications for code designated diagonal tyres with speed symbol A8.</li></ol>
|
GRRF/2017/0019
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 109
(France)
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 109
|
Description
|
In order to have a Regulation on the retreaded tyres with definitions and provisions structured in the same way of those previously introduced in amendments of “new tyres” Regulations, this amendment: - indicates that for the purpose of this Regulation “tyres” means “pneumatic tyres” (all text amended accordingly)
- introduces definitions of:
- “retreader” copy based on that “manufacturer” in the tyres regulations
- Brand name", “Trademark”, “Trade description” and “Commercial name” as defined in the tyre regulations
- Material manufacturer / material supplier
- takes into account the rounding rules (already approved in the other tyre regulations) for the calculation of width and diameter of the tyres
- aligns the title and the provisions of the para. 12 related to the names and addresses of Technical Services, Approved Laboratories and administrative Department with their equivalent in the tyres regulations
- add some information in the certificate to the attention of the Type Approval Authorities for making easier the relationship between this one and the products
- introduces:
- In para. 6.4.4.1., the possibility for the material manufacturer or supplier of the pre-cured tread pattern to provide directly to the Type Approval Authority (or Technical Service) all the documents needed to demonstrate the retreaded tyres produced with this pre-cured tread pattern fulfil the requirements of paragraph 7.2. in order to be classified as a “snow tyre for use in severe snow conditions”
- In para. 7.1.4.2. a new table of tolerances with the objective to properly take into account the requirements for size designations in Annex 5 in addition to what already expressed. The maximum overall width has been taken from the international Tyre Standard ETRTO and Tire and Rim Association.
|
Submitted by: France
|
Date: 06 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF/2018/9 | Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 109
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
33. The expert from France presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/20, aimed at harmonizing the definitions and provisions in Regulation No. 109 with those introduced in Regulations Nos. 30, 54 and 117. Following the intervention of the expert from BIPAVER and the expert from Spain, GRRF agreed that the text proposed in para. 6.4.4. could be clarified. The expert from France volunteered to prepare a revised proposal together with the expert from Spain and from BIPAVER.
33. The expert from France presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2018/9, aimed at harmonizing the definitions and provisions in Regulation No. 109 with those introduced in UN Regulations Nos. 30, 54 and 117. The expert from ETRTO introduced GRRF-86-24, proposing amendment to this proposal. GRRF adopted the proposal as amended by Annex VI (of the session report) and requested the secretariat to submit it as draft supplement 9 (note: corrected by GAR from Supplement 4 in the published report.) to UN Regulation No. 109. GRRF requested the secretariat to address corrections to the French version of the document suggested by the expert from France.
|
GRRF/2017/20
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Retreaded Tires for Commercial Vehicles
CV Retreaded Tires
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval for the Production of Retreaded Pneumatic Tyres for Commercial Vehicles and their Trailers
|
In order to have a Regulation on the retreaded tyres with definitions and provisions structured in the same way of those previously introduced in amendments of "new tyres" Regulations, this amendment:<ol class="alpha"><li>indicates that for the purpose of this Regulation "tyres" means "pneumatic tyres" (all text amended accordingly)</li><li>introduces definitions of:<ul><li>"retreader” copy based on that “manufacturer" in the tyres regulations</li><li>Brand name", "Trademark", "Trade description" and "Commercial name" as defined in the tyre regulations</li><li>Material manufacturer / material supplier</li></ul></li><li>takes into account the rounding rules (already approved in the other tyre regulations) for the calculation of width and diameter of the tyres</li><li>aligns the title and the provisions of the para. 12 related to the names and addresses of Technical Services, Approved Laboratories and administrative Department with their equivalent in the tyres regulations</li><li>add some information in the certificate to the attention of the Type Approval Authorities for making easier the relationship between this one and the products</li><li>introduces:<ul><li>In para. 6.4.4.1., the possibility for the material manufacturer or supplier of the pre-cured tread pattern to provide directly to the Type Approval Authority (or Technical Service) all the documents needed to demonstrate the retreaded tyres produced with this pre-cured tread pattern fulfil the requirements of paragraph 7.2. in order to be classified as a "snow tyre for use in severe snow conditions"</li><li>In para. 7.1.4.2. a new table of tolerances with the objective to properly take into account the requirements for size designations in Annex 5 in addition to what already expressed. The maximum overall width has been taken from the international Tyre Standard ETRTO and Tire and Rim Association.</li></ul></li></ol>
|
GRRF/2017/0020
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 142
(OICA and ETRTO)
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 142
|
Description
|
Proposal to correct references to paragraphs in Regulations Nos. 30 and 54 which have to be updated pursuant to renumbering in the source regulations.
|
Submitted by: OICA and ETRTO
|
Date: 06 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF-84-35 | Adopted amendments to document GRRF/2017/21
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
39. The expert from ETRTO presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/21 proposing corrections to paragraph references due to amendments to Regulation No. 30. GRRF agreed with the proposal as reproduced in Annex IV of the session report.
40. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/44 as well as ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/21 amended as draft Supplement 1 to Regulation No. 142, for consideration and vote by WP.29 and AC.1 at their March 2018 sessions.
|
GRRF/2017/21
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Tyre Installation
Tyre Installation
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the installation of their tyres (tentative title pending regulation development)
|
Proposal to correct references to paragraphs in Regulations Nos. 30 and 54 which have to be updated pursuant to renumbering in the source regulations.
|
GRRF/2017/0021
|
Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 00 series of amendments to Regulation No. 89
(OICA)
Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 00 series of amendments to Regulation No. 89
|
Description
|
Proposal to - exempt cases where the driver has temporarily deactivated the speed limiter from the warning requirement for excess speed in in order to reduce driver distraction
- introduce throttle control via adjustment of the accelerator pedal position
- to correct an editorial error in paras. 5.2.5.4.2. and 21.2.5.4.2.
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 06 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF-86-14 | UN R89: Proposal for Supplement 3
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
61. The export from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/22 with provisions on the warning activation condition in case of the system deactivation by the driver as well as a verification simplification of the throttle control action during testing. The proposal received some comments. The expert from OICA agreed to prepare a revised proposal and additional information for the February 2018.
56. The expert from OICA introduced GRRF-86-14 with provisions on the warning activation condition, in case of the system deactivation by the driver as well as a verification simplification of the throttle control action during testing. GRRF adopted the proposal as reproduced in Annex VII. GRRF requested to submit it together with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2013/13 as draft Supplement 3 to UN Regulation No. 89 to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2018 sessions.
|
GRRF/2017/22
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Speed Limitation Devices
Speed Limitation Devices
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of:
I. Vehicles with regard to Limitation of their Maximum Speed
II. Vehicles with regard to the Installation of a Speed Limitation Device (SLD) of an Approved Type
III. Speed Limitation Devices (SLD)
|
Proposal to<ol class='alpha'><li>exempt cases where the driver has temporarily deactivated the speed limiter from the warning requirement for excess speed in in order to reduce driver distraction</li><li>introduce throttle control via adjustment of the accelerator pedal position</li><li>to correct an editorial error in paras. 5.2.5.4.2. and 21.2.5.4.2.</li></ol>
|
GRRF/2017/0022
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulations Nos. 13, 13-H and 140
(OICA)
Proposal for amendments to Regulations Nos. 13, 13-H and 140
|
Description
|
Revised proposal pursuant to GRRF discussions to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention.
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 06 Jul 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF-83-22/Rev.1 | Revised proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 13-H Supplement 16 to 00 series of amendments, Regulation No. 13 Supplement 14 to 11 series of amendments and Regulation No. 140 original version
GRRF-84-22 | Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79
GRRF-84-39 | Adopted amendments to GRRF/2017/23 (UN R13, 13-H, 140)
WP.29/2018/11 | UN R79: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments
WP.29/2018/13 | UN R140: Proposal for Supplement 1
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
48. The expert from OICA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/23 as amended by GRRF-84-22 with provisions to be included in UN Regulations Nos. 13, 13-H, 79 and 140 related to the stability control warning activation by Corrective Steering Functions and Automatically Commanded Steering Functions. The proposal received some comments. GRRF amended the proposal as reflected in GRRF-84-39.
49. GRRF agreed with the proposal as amended by Annex V of the GRRF session report and requested the secretariat to submit it [together with GRRF-84-22] as draft supplements to Regulations Nos. 13, 13-H, 79 and 140 to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2018 sessions.
8. The expert from OICA introduced GRRF-83-22, proposing clarifications to the provisions related to the stability control optical warning in Regulations No. 13, 13-H and 140. He explained that, to date, braking regulations explicitly permitted the use of the Electronic Stability Control (ESC) flashing symbol for the purpose of showing interventions of systems related to the vehicle stability function (e.g. traction control etc.). He added that with the proposed clarification, it would be clarified that the use of the ESC flashing symbol would be permitted for indicating the intervention of individual steering control for vehicle stability such as Corrective Steering Functions, if related to the vehicle stability function.
9. GRRF agreed to resume consideration of this document while reviewing the proposal on Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF) under agenda item 9.
|
GRRF/2017/23
|
07 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking
Heavy-Duty Braking
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles of Categories M, N and O with regard to Braking
Light-Duty Vehicle Braking
Light Vehicle Braking
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Passenger Cars with regard to Braking
Electronic Stability Control Systems
ESC Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of passenger cars with regard to electronic stability control systems
|
Revised proposal pursuant to GRRF discussions to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention.
|
GRRF/2017/0023
|
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 131
(Germany)
Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 131
|
Description
|
Proposal to restrict manual deactivation of AEB systems to speeds under 30 km/h. The proposal would require automatic reactivation of the AEBS when the vehicle speed exceeds 30 km/h.
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 13 Jul 17
|
Status: Formal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRRF-84-21 | Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2017/24
GRRF-86-18 | UN R131: Proposal to amend document GRRF/2017/24
GRRF-86-32 | UN R131: Proposal to amend document GRRF/2017/24
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
8. The expert from Germany presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/24 proposing provisions on automatic reactivation of AEBS. The expert from OICA answered to the proposal (GRRF-84-21). GRRF reacted positively to the proposal and invited the experts from Germany and from OICA to submit a revised proposal for the February 2018 session of GRRF.
8. The expert from Germany recalled the purpose of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/24 proposing more stringent provisions on automatic reactivation of AEBS. He presented GRRF-86-32 addressing concerns expressed at the September 2017 session on the original proposal. The expert from OICA answered to the proposal (GRRF-86-18). The experts from Nordic Countries supported OICA’s proposal as they are facing user acceptance issues on their market due to false AEBS warnings. GRRF urged the experts from Germany and from OICA to submit a revised proposal for the September 2018 session of GRRF.
|
GRRF/2017/24
|
13 Jul 2017
|
Working Party
|
Advanced Emergency Braking Systems
Advanced Emergency Braking
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to advanced emergency braking systems
|
Proposal to restrict manual deactivation of AEB systems to speeds under 30 km/h. The proposal would require automatic reactivation of the AEBS when the vehicle speed exceeds 30 km/h.
|
GRRF/2017/0024
|
Proposal for draft corrigendum to UN Regulation No. 108
(Russia)
Proposal for draft corrigendum to UN Regulation No. 108
|
Description
|
Proposal to align the Russian text with the original English text. In the English versions, the title of Annex 1 (Communication concerning the approval or extension or refusal or withdrawal of approval or production definitely discontinued of a retreading production unit pursuant to Regulation No. 108) is essentially identical to that use for Annex 1 of UN R109. Therefore, this proposal amends the title of Annex 1 in the Russian version of UN R108 to coincide with that of the Russian version of Annex 1 in UN R109.
|
Submitted by: Russia
|
Date: 02 Aug 17
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related discussions
84th GRRF session (19-22
Sep 2017)
44. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/25 proposing a Corrigendum in Russian only of Regulation No. 108. GRRF adopted the proposal and requested the secretariat to submit it as draft Corrigendum to Regulation No. 108 to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2018 session.
|
GRRF/2017/25
|
30 Aug 2017
|
Working Party
|
Retreaded Tires for Motor Vehicles
Retreaded Tires
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval for the Production of Retreaded Pneumatic Tyres for Motor Vehicles and their Trailers
|
Proposal to align the Russian text with the original English text. In the English versions, the title of Annex 1 (Communication concerning the approval or extension or refusal or withdrawal of approval or production definitely discontinued of a retreading production unit pursuant to Regulation No. 108) is essentially identical to that use for Annex 1 of UN R109. Therefore, this proposal amends the title of Annex 1 in the Russian version of UN R108 to coincide with that of the Russian version of Annex 1 in UN R109.
|
GRRF/2017/0025
|