UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
Description
|
Proposal to remove references to age limits in preference for limits based on stature in the definition of “infant carrier”, to update the transitional provisions in line with the new guidelines on regulatory procedures (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.2), especially concerning extensions of approvals, and to replace a reference in para. 16.11 to “vehicle approval” with “Enhanced Child Restraint Systems”.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/24
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Document date: 25 Sep 18
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-63-27 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments
GRSP-63-30 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
31. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 to clarify the definition of “infant carrier” and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 to clarify that certain user information was displayed sufficiently. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-28 to improve the consistency of the information. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 as amended by Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 129, as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
36. GRSP noted GRSP-63-09 which stresses the need that certain information for users be clearly displayed. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject on the basis of a revised proposal by the expert from CLEPA. GRSP also noted GRSP-63-27 on clarifying the definition of “infant carrier” and GRSP-63-30 on clarifying that extensions of type approvals to the 02 series of amendments shall continue to be granted. GRSP agreed in principle on both proposals and requested the secretariat to distribute them with an official symbol at the December 2018 session of GRSP.
|
GRSP/2018/24
|
28 Sep 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to remove references to age limits in preference for limits based on stature in the definition of "infant carrier", to update the transitional provisions in line with the new guidelines on regulatory procedures (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.2), especially concerning extensions of approvals, and to replace a reference in para. 16.11 to "vehicle approval" with "Enhanced Child Restraint Systems".
|
GRSP/2018/0024
|
UN R16: Proposal for a corrigendum 1 to the 07 series of amendments
(Netherlands)
Description
|
Proposal to update the Communication Form since from the 07 series of amendments rear safety belt reminders have been added.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/25
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Document date: 25 Sep 18
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2019/24 | UN R16: Proposal for Supplement 1 the 08 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/104 | UN R16: Proposal for Supplement 12 to the 06 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/105 | UN R16: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 07 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
15. The expert from the Netherlands introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/25 to correct the type approval communication to extend the requirements for the safety-belt reminder installation not only to the driver’s seat. Since, the proposed amendment would entail broader technical aspects, GRSP agreed to incorporate it in a further proposal of amendments to UN Regulation No. 16. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session.
|
GRSP/2018/25
|
28 Sep 2018
|
Working Party
|
Safety belts and related systems
Safety belt systems
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of: I. Safety-belts, Restraint Systems, Child Restraint Systems and ISOFIX Child Restraint Systems for Occupants of Power-driven Vehicles II. Vehicles Equipped with Safety-belts, Safety-belt Reminders, Restraint Systems, Child Restraint Systems and ISOFIX Child Restraint Systems
|
Proposal to update the Communication Form since from the 07 series of amendments rear safety belt reminders have been added.
|
GRSP/2018/0025
|
UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
(ANEC and CI)
Description
|
Proposal to prohibit the granting of new approvals under UN R44 from [1 September 2020] and to amend the transitional provisions accordingly.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/26
|
Submitted by: ANEC and CI
|
Document date: 25 Sep 18
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-35/Rev.1 | UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/36 | UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
20. The expert from IC introduced GRSP-64-32 which explained that for the forthcoming entry into force of “Phase 3” of UN Regulation No. 129 (belted Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS)), all groups and categories except Group III on forward-facing non-integral CRS would be covered. Accordingly, he explained that belted CRS could be still approved according to UN Regulation No. 44 for an undefined period. He therefore proposed to phase out this category of CRS (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/26). The proposal received comments on the transitional provisions and GRSP considered GRSP-64-35-Rev.1. Finally, GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/26, as amended by Annex IV to the session report, and requested the secretariat to submit it as Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No.44, for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP/2018/26
|
28 Sep 2018
|
Working Party
|
Child Restraint Systems
Child Restraint Systems
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Restraining Devices for Child Occupants of Power-driven Vehicles ("Child Restraint System")
|
Proposal to prohibit the granting of new approvals under UN R44 from [1 September 2020] and to amend the transitional provisions accordingly.
|
GRSP/2018/0026
|
GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1
Description
|
Latest developments from the GTR 7 informal group to implement the Phase 2 development of the GTR. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/27
|
Document date: 20 Sep 18
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-38 | Introduction to Revision of GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/27)
GRSP-64-39/Rev.1 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1 (Phase 2 development)
GRSP/2019/10 | GTR 7: Proposal to amend the draft Amendment 1
GRSP/2019/5 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1 (Phase 2)
GRSP/2019/8 | GTR 7: Proposal to amend the draft Amendment 1
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
4. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-64-38, to present the proposed Amendment 2 (GRSP-64-39-Rev.1 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/27) to UN GTR No. 7 (Phase 2 of the UN GTR on head restraints), jointly prepared with the experts from Japan and the Netherlands. He explained that the proposal still has several items, in several square brackets, to be solved. However, he added that the draft amendment would introduced five main changes to the UN GTR: - Procedure for establishing the height of the head restraint base on the head contact rather than at its absolute height;
- Height measurement test procedure;
- Deletion of the backset measurement test procedure using the H-point machine method;
- Introduction of the backset measurement test procedure using the R-point method; and
- Introduction of the dynamic performance test procedure, by using the Biomechanical Rear Impact Dummy (BioRID) and empirical criteria instead of biomechanical (due to the absence of an absolute medical definition of whiplash) to establish seat performance.
4. The expert from Germany introduced GRSP-65-32, to present the proposed Amendment 2 (GRSP-65-24 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/5) to UN GTR No. 7 (Phase 2 of the UN GTR on head restraints), jointly prepared with the experts from Japan and the Netherlands. He explained that the proposal has removed several square brackets and therefore solving the main issues. He added that the draft amendment would introduce: (a) injury criteria focusing on Neck Injury Criteria (NIC) namely upper and lower neck flexion and extension, (b) BioRID as an option for contracting parties to Hybrid III still and © procedure for establishing the height of the head restraint based on the head contact rather than at its absolute height. He clarified that the proposal that would need still some changes, will be complemented by a proposal of Addendum 1 to the Mutual Resolution No. 1 to insert drawings and specifications of the BioRID, to be presented at the December 2019 session of GRSP. Moreover, the experts from France and Russian Federation announced that they would not need the translation of the BioRID manual or other dummy specification and can be dealt with in English only. GRSP noted that all these specifications, when they would be submitted, shall need a disclaimer letter from the dummy manufacturer concerning copyright claims and that they might be upload on the M.R.1 website without any copyright infringements.
5. [At] the same time, the expert from Japan introduced the ninth status report of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Head Restraints (GRSP-65-31). The expert from CLEPA withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/8 and introduced GRSP-65-30 superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2019/10 amending the static options of the proposal.
6. Finally, GRSP experts were invited to provide comments to GRSP-65-24 to the expert from Japan by 13 September 2019. Moreover, GRSP requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-65-30 and GRSP-65-31 with an official symbol and agreed to seek consent of WP.29 and AC.3 to extend the mandate of the IWG until June 2020.
|
GRSP/2018/27
|
28 Sep 2018
|
Working Party
|
Head Restraints
Head Restraints
Global Technical Regulation No. 7: Head Restraints
|
Latest developments from the GTR 7 informal group to implement the Phase 2 development of the GTR. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
|
GRSP/2018/0027
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments, Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
Description
|
Proposal to introduce new and modified labeling and to clarify packaging information to distinguish between forward-facing-only, rear-facing-only, and convertible CRS in order to reduce the risk of users misusing these enhanced CRS.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/28
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Document date: 25 Sep 18
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-63-09 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 8 to the 00 series of amendments, Supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments, Supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments
GRSP-64-28 | UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/28
WP.29/2019/37 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the original series of amendments
WP.29/2019/38 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/39 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
WP.29/2019/40 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
31. The expert from CLEPA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 to clarify the definition of “infant carrier” and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 to clarify that certain user information was displayed sufficiently. The expert from Spain introduced GRSP-64-28 to improve the consistency of the information. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 as amended by Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24 as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28 as part of (see para. 29) draft Supplement 9 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 129, as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and as part of (see paras. 29 and 30) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
36. GRSP noted GRSP-63-09 which stresses the need that certain information for users be clearly displayed. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject on the basis of a revised proposal by the expert from CLEPA. GRSP also noted GRSP-63-27 on clarifying the definition of “infant carrier” and GRSP-63-30 on clarifying that extensions of type approvals to the 02 series of amendments shall continue to be granted. GRSP agreed in principle on both proposals and requested the secretariat to distribute them with an official symbol at the December 2018 session of GRSP.
|
GRSP/2018/28
|
29 Sep 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to introduce new and modified labeling and to clarify packaging information to distinguish between forward-facing-only, rear-facing-only, and convertible CRS in order to reduce the risk of users misusing these enhanced CRS.
|
GRSP/2018/0028
|
UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
Description
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of the booster cushion category of Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/29
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Document date: 26 Sep 18
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/32 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
GRSP-64-15 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
GRSP-64-16/Rev.1 | UN R129: Presentation on the Introduction of Booster Cushions (04 series)
GRSP-64-43 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
35. The expert from CLEPA introduced a summary of all the documents that he had submitted (GRSP-64-29) and presented GRSP-64-16-Rev.1 on the draft 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29 complemented by GRSP-64-15) aimed at including in the scope of the UN Regulation: - non-integral Universal ECRS with no backrest (i-Size booster cushion) and
- non-integral Specific vehicle ECRS with no backrest (Specific vehicle booster cushion).
Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced a consolidated text of all the comments received ( GRSP-64-43). The expert from Germany argued that the definition of i-Size was associated with an additional side-impact test to assess protection of children when the vehicle was involved in such a collision and to ensure that children under fifteen months travel in the rearward facing position. Therefore, he stated that he opposed associating the above proposed new categories of ECRS with the i-Size definition to avoid confusion among users. The expert from Japan supported the opinion of the expert from Germany. The experts from IC and EC endorsed the inclusion of such ECRS in the scope of UN Regulation No. 129 to definitively phase out UN Regulation No. 44. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session. Therefore, GRSP agreed to defer the discussion on parallel amendments to other series of amendments affected by the draft 04 series of amendments ( ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/30, ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/32 and GRSP-64-27) at its May 2019 session. Moreover, the secretariat was requested to keep GRSP-64-27 as a reference in the agenda and to distribute GRSP-64-43 with an official symbol at the next session of GRSP.
|
GRSP/2018/29
|
01 Oct 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of the booster cushion category of Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
|
GRSP/2018/0029
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
Description
|
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/30
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Document date: 26 Sep 18
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/32 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
35. The expert from CLEPA introduced a summary of all the documents that he had submitted (GRSP-64-29) and presented GRSP-64-16-Rev.1 on the draft 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29 complemented by GRSP-64-15) aimed at including in the scope of the UN Regulation: - non-integral Universal ECRS with no backrest (i-Size booster cushion) and
- non-integral Specific vehicle ECRS with no backrest (Specific vehicle booster cushion).
Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced a consolidated text of all the comments received ( GRSP-64-43). The expert from Germany argued that the definition of i-Size was associated with an additional side-impact test to assess protection of children when the vehicle was involved in such a collision and to ensure that children under fifteen months travel in the rearward facing position. Therefore, he stated that he opposed associating the above proposed new categories of ECRS with the i-Size definition to avoid confusion among users. The expert from Japan supported the opinion of the expert from Germany. The experts from IC and EC endorsed the inclusion of such ECRS in the scope of UN Regulation No. 129 to definitively phase out UN Regulation No. 44. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session. Therefore, GRSP agreed to defer the discussion on parallel amendments to other series of amendments affected by the draft 04 series of amendments ( ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/30, ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/32 and GRSP-64-27) at its May 2019 session. Moreover, the secretariat was requested to keep GRSP-64-27 as a reference in the agenda and to distribute GRSP-64-43 with an official symbol at the next session of GRSP.
|
GRSP/2018/30
|
01 Oct 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
|
GRSP/2018/0030
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
Description
|
The 01 series of amendments to UN R129 amended the door panel geometry to create a small opening close to the seat bight. This change protected the panel from interaction with the anchorage of the adult seat belt on the test bench (added subsequently in the 02 series). Although Integral ISOFIX Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS) do not use the belt, these CRS were also required to use this new door panel geometry. This proposal amends the 02 series of amendments to require Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the original door panel geometry with no opening (except during extensions of approvals in which the new panel geometry was used). The proposal ensures that ISOFIX ECRS designs cannot use the opening to mitigate loads to the ECRS and dummy.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/31
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Document date: 27 Sep 18
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-42 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
32. The expert from CLEPA withdrew ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/31 and introduced GRSP-64-42 to clarify that conformity of production (COP) testing should be conducted using the same requirements which were effective at the time of the initial approval or any later applicable extension. The expert from Italy suggested that a similar requirement could be handed over to other UN Regulations to ensure consistency of COP testing. GRSP adopted GRSP-64-42 as reproduced in Annex V to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit GRSP-64-42 as part of (see paras. 29–31) draft Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and as part of (see paras. 29–31) draft Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 for consideration and vote at the June 2019 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
GRSP/2018/31
|
01 Oct 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
The 01 series of amendments to UN R129 amended the door panel geometry to create a small opening close to the seat bight. This change protected the panel from interaction with the anchorage of the adult seat belt on the test bench (added subsequently in the 02 series). Although Integral ISOFIX Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS) do not use the belt, these CRS were also required to use this new door panel geometry. This proposal amends the 02 series of amendments to require Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the original door panel geometry with no opening (except during extensions of approvals in which the new panel geometry was used). The proposal ensures that ISOFIX ECRS designs cannot use the opening to mitigate loads to the ECRS and dummy.
|
GRSP/2018/0031
|
UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(CLEPA)
Description
|
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/32
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Document date: 27 Sep 18
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP/2018/30 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
GRSP/2018/29 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
35. The expert from CLEPA introduced a summary of all the documents that he had submitted (GRSP-64-29) and presented GRSP-64-16-Rev.1 on the draft 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 129 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29 complemented by GRSP-64-15) aimed at including in the scope of the UN Regulation: - non-integral Universal ECRS with no backrest (i-Size booster cushion) and
- non-integral Specific vehicle ECRS with no backrest (Specific vehicle booster cushion).
Moreover, the expert from CLEPA introduced a consolidated text of all the comments received ( GRSP-64-43). The expert from Germany argued that the definition of i-Size was associated with an additional side-impact test to assess protection of children when the vehicle was involved in such a collision and to ensure that children under fifteen months travel in the rearward facing position. Therefore, he stated that he opposed associating the above proposed new categories of ECRS with the i-Size definition to avoid confusion among users. The expert from Japan supported the opinion of the expert from Germany. The experts from IC and EC endorsed the inclusion of such ECRS in the scope of UN Regulation No. 129 to definitively phase out UN Regulation No. 44. Finally, GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session. Therefore, GRSP agreed to defer the discussion on parallel amendments to other series of amendments affected by the draft 04 series of amendments ( ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/30, ECE/ TRANS/WP.29/ GRSP/2018/32 and GRSP-64-27) at its May 2019 session. Moreover, the secretariat was requested to keep GRSP-64-27 as a reference in the agenda and to distribute GRSP-64-43 with an official symbol at the next session of GRSP.
|
GRSP/2018/32
|
01 Oct 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
|
GRSP/2018/0032
|
UN R129: Proposal for a Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
(Netherlands)
Description
|
Proposal to introduce a definition for “insert” and provisions for their use.
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/33
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Document date: 27 Sep 18
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRSP/2018/33
|
01 Oct 2018
|
Working Party
|
Enhanced Child Restraint Systems
Enhanced Child Restraints
Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles.
|
Proposal to introduce a definition for "insert" and provisions for their use.
|
GRSP/2018/0033
|
UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
(EC and Japan)
Description
|
Proposal transposing the provisions of the draft GTR 7-Amendment 1 (aka Phase 2) into UN R17. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
|
Document Reference Number: GRSP/2018/34
|
Submitted by: EC and Japan
|
Document date: 27 Sep 18
|
Document status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRSP-64-25 | UN R17: Proposal for a 10 series of amendments
GRSP-64-37 | UN R17: Presentation on the revision to align UN R17 with GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/34)
GRSP/2019/7 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
GRSP/2019/9 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
GRSP/2019/27 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
Related discussions
64th GRSP session (11-14
Dec 2018)
16. The experts from Japan and EC introduced GRSP-64-37 on the proposal of amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/34) to UN Regulation No. 17 (Strength of seats) that would align it with Phase 2 of UN GTR No. 7 (see para. 5 above). The expert from CLEPA introduced GRSP-64-25, to clarify static alternative provisions of UN GTR No. 7, Phase 2 and modifications to the allowed range of tolerances to backset retention and to the energy dissipation test. GRSP agreed to hand over GRSP-64-25 to the IWG for its possible integration in the proposal of amendments to UN Regulation No. 17 and to the draft amendment to UN GTR No. 7. GRSP agreed to resume discussion on this subject at its May 2019 session on the basis of the progress of the IWG work.
|
GRSP/2018/34
|
01 Oct 2018
|
Working Party
|
Strength of Seats, Anchorages, and Head Restraints
Strength of Seats
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to the Seats, their Anchorages and any Head Restraints
|
Proposal transposing the provisions of the draft GTR 7-Amendment 1 (aka Phase 2) into UN R17. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
|
GRSP/2018/0034
|