1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | UN R43: Proposal for the 02 series of amendments | ||||||||
Reference Number | GRSG-127-23 | ||||||||
Date |
11 Apr 2024
|
||||||||
Summary | Proposal to specify the requirements for the headform test. This test should not be mandatory for vehicles where the protection of the occupant’s head is not achieved by the glazing itself, rather by a restraint system or other means. | ||||||||
Source(s) | OICA | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R43 Safety Glazing | ||||||||
Regulatory Impact |
02 series of amendments
|
||||||||
Proposal Status | Returned | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Related Documents | |||||||||
GRSG-126-16 | UN R43: Proposal for the 02 series of amendments (superseded) | ||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
GRSG | Session 127 | 15-19 Apr 2024 |
9. GRSG noted the proposal (GRSG-127-23) from the expert of OICA, that was revised from the October 2023 session of GRSG. In the case when safety-belts and an airbag limit head movement, exemption for the mandatory headform test to limit head injuries. The expert of OICA stressed that UN Regulation No. 21 provides a set of dummies and tests which aim for head contact to not occur. The expert from Japan argued that the proposal over-relaxed the purpose of the UN Regulation and recommended careful consideration of the issue. The expert from the United Kingdom offered to discuss online, possible improvements with the expert from OICA. Finally, GRSG agreed to resume discussion on a revised proposal and requested concerned parties to liaise with the expert from OICA. |
||||||||