| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document title | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 78 | ||||||||||
| Date | 16 Sep 2015 | EC responses to IMMA comments (document GRRF-80-13) on the proposa to align the text with the provisions for anti-lock braking systems (ABS) used in other regulations (document GRRF/2015/41). | |||||||||
| Source(s) | EC | ||||||||||
| Status | Superseded | ||||||||||
| Rulemaking area(s) | |||||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||||
| Related documents | |||||||||||
| GRRF-80-13 | IMMA comments on the proposed motorcycle ABS braking changes (Documents GRRF/2015/40 and 41) | ||||||||||
| GRRF/2015/41 | Proposal for an amendment of Regulation No. 78 (Superseded) | ||||||||||
| Downloads: | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||||
| GRRF | Session 80 | 15-18 Sep 2015 |
23. GRRF reviewed ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/41 and GRRF-80-24 under agenda item 5(b) below. 24. The expert from EC introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/40 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/41, proposing to clarify the possibility to install means to temporarily reduce or disable the ABS function of motorcycles in certain conditions. The expert from Canada submitted an alternative wording (GRRF-80-19) and recalled that an authorization from the Executive Committee AC.3 for developing an amendment to GTR No. 3 would be required. The proposal received some general comments related to road safety. The expert from IMMA briefly introduced GRRF-80-13 commenting the proposals to which the expert from EC responded (GRRF-80-24 and GRRF-80-25). A majority of experts expressed a specific concern related to condition (f). The expert from EC volunteered to prepare two revised proposals for the [February 2016] session of GRRF. |
||||||||||