Informal Working Group for the Development of a UN Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles | Session 6 | 1 Dec 2015
Zoetermeer
Agenda Item 6.1.
Pause functionality

Current situation among Contracting Parties:

ChinaUSAEUUNRJapanTaiwan
OptionalProhibitedMandatoryOptionalOptionalOptional

Japan: about 50% of drivers use the pause switch in residential areas by night due to complaints from neighbors.

OICA: the responsibility remains with the driver in case the AVAS is turned on. OEMs must make a trade-off between driver’s request for vehicle interior quietness and safety for pedestrians. It appears strange that people in Japan complain about AVAS but not about ICE. This may be a question of sound quality. It is therefore important to have flexibility to design acceptable sounds. There are studies available that suggest that sleep annoyance due to noise by night may lead to early intestacy. GAR note: “intestacy” refers to the status of the estate of a deceased individual where no legal arrangements have been made for the disposition of the estate. Presumably, this OICA comment refers to data indicating higher rates of intestacy suggestive of early/unexpected deaths.)

Chair: today no CP wants to prohibit or mandate a pause switch. Arguments are needed to change that position. A questionnaire for EV-drivers can help better understand their habit when using the pause switch. VRU proposes to automatically switch off the pause functionality in order to avoid that the driver forgets to turn the AVAS back on again.