| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | UN Regulation No. 116 and innovative vehicle alarm systems/anti‐theft systems | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRSG-107-08 | ||||||||
| Date |
15 Sep 2014
|
||||||||
| Summary | Input from Germany in response to the European Commission request (document GRSG-106-38) for input on the possible type approval of new systems that enable unlocking cars via smart phones and that send silent alarms to security services via the Internet. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | Germany | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R116 Anti-theft and Alarm Systems | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| GRSG-106-38 | UN Regulation No. 116 and innovative vehicle alarm systems/ anti-theft systems | ||||||||
| GRSG-115-20 | UN R116: Proposal for amendments (superseded) | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .doc format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRSG | Session 107 | 30 Sep-3 Oct 2014 |
28. Referring to the request of comments from GRSG (GRSG-106-38) submitted by the expert from EC at the last session, the expert from Germany provided information (GRSG-107-08) from the German type approval authority on the possibility of using a smart phone as an innovative alarm system. He added that some of these solutions had been refused, such as those which open the vehicle, because the smartphone signal was considered as an additional key, not provided by the vehicle manufacturer, which could potentially interfere with the original alarm system from the manufacturer. The GRSG Chair invited experts to provide their comments to the expert from EC and GRSG agreed to resume consideration on this matter at its May 2015 session. 28. Referring to the request of comments from GRSG (GRSG-106-38) submitted by the expert from EC at the last session, the expert from Germany provided information (GRSG-107-08) from the German type approval authority on the possibility of using a smart phone as an innovative alarm system. He added that some of these solutions had been refused, such as those which open the vehicle, because the smartphone signal was considered as an additional key, not provided by the vehicle manufacturer, which could potentially interfere with the original alarm system from the manufacturer. The GRSG Chair invited experts to provide their comments to the expert from EC and GRSG agreed to resume consideration on this matter at its May 2015 session. |
||||||||