27. GRRF considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2011/38 by the experts from CLEPA and OICA clarifying the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 90. GRRF adopted the proposal as amended below and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1, for consideration at their March 2012 sessions, as draft Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 90.

Page 18, paragraph 4.2.1.1.3., fourth ident

• For less than 300 brake applications read less than 250 brake applications

28. GRRF considered GRRF-71-02 by the expert from FEMFM proposing that no test be required for “identical” replacement brake linings as it is the case for “identical” replacement discs and drums. GRRF noted a number of comments and agreed to consider again this proposal with an official symbol.