1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | WorldSID test results: Autoliv Research | ||||||||
Reference Number | WS-06-04 | ||||||||
Date |
24 Jul 2011
|
||||||||
Source(s) | Autoliv | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | WorldSID Harmonization | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
WS | Session 6 | 8 Jun 2011 |
Autoliv presented analysis from a series of sled tests and vehicle-to-vehicle crash tests. Results from the 5th female testing in the rear seating positions showed that that the WorldSID 5th female had different kinematic behavior and different deflection measurements than the SIDIIs. It was noted to fully compare the results we need reliable risk functions and more measurements in the pelvis. They conducted a series of sled tests using the EuroNCAP side impact pulse and a fixture with a generic intruding side door. The WorldSID 50th and 5th dummies were positioned on a seat fitted with a thorax side airbag. Several durability issues were noted after the testing, including problems with the pelvis measurements and the 50th shoulder IR-TRACC. In the vehicle-to-vehicle tests, they investigated a number of different aspects of the crash including the influence of impact speed, mass ratio, and compatibility. Conclusions from the testing showed that the WorldSID dummy is a good tool and that side airbags reduce the risk of thoracic injury. It also directed focus of future testing to pelvis loading, occupant-to-occupant interaction, rear seat occupants, and senior occupants. |
||||||||