Proposal to introduce provisions under a car-to-bicycle test scenario.

Proposal to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.

Proposal to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.

List of decisions subject to the special “silence procedure” whereby parties may signal any reservations concerning the decisions following the session proper. This procedure was adopted due to the shortened and virtual sessions necessitated by current health and travel restrictions.

Advance draft proposal to WP.29 for the car-to-bicycle AEBS scenarios for GRVA review.

Draft proposal to WP.29 for AEBS car-to-bicycle provisions for GRVA review.

Proposals for improvements and clarifications to the text of UN R152 from the AEBS informal working group.

Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/35 to improve the text on a number of issues.

Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/27 to improve the text on a number of issues.

Proposal from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 to supplement the proposals of document GRVA/2020/26 to improve the text on a number of issues.

Proposal from the AEBS group co-chairs and secretary with proposal regarding overlap ratio.

GRVA proposal to improve the assessment of AEBS robustness.

Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.

Proposal for the second step of a two-step introduction of car-to-bicycle provisions.

Proposal for the first step in a two-step introduction of car-to-bicycle provisions.

Proposal for a single step introduction of car-to-bicycle provisions.

Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M₁ and N₁ to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario as the second step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate proposal for the first step in this two-step approach. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)

Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M₁ and N₁ to introduce provisions for the car-to-bicycle scenario as the first step of a two-step approach. (The IWG has prepared a separate document for the second step of this two-step approach. Alternatively, the IWG has prepared a proposal for a single (all-in-one) approach. GRVA is requested therefore to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)

Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M1 and N1 in order to improve the Appendix 2 Annex 3 for assessing robustness against false reaction, to introduce new provisions for automatic deactivation of AEBS, and to improve the text in other instances.

Proposal to clarify that the AEBS may be automatically deactivated in the event that the electronic stability control system is deactivated.

Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for vehicles of Categories M₁ and N₁ to introduce provisions for car-to-bicycle scenario in a single step approach. (Alternatively, the IWG has prepared proposals for a two-step approach to introducing the new requirements. GRVA is therefore requested to make a decision on whether car-to-bicycle should be introduced in a single step or in a two-step approach.)

Proposal for amendments concerning “false reactions” (false positives).

Proposal to change PBC from 0.9 to 1.0, indicate the reference tyre, note the lighting conditions, and allow for deviating test conditions at the manufacturer’s discretion and with the agreement of the Technical Service under the car-to-bicycle test provisions.

Proposal concerning “false reactions” (false positives).

Presentation on the use of simulation tools under type approval and in discussions on the validation of automated driving systems.

Commented version of the working draft amendments. Revised to include additional AEBS stakeholder comments.

Raises whether to add 38 km/h in car-to-pedestrian limit table as is included in the car-to-car limit table. The proposal would not change the performance requirements but would align the two tables.

Slide regarding human driver behaviors and results under far-side turning (in Japan, right turn) scenario.

Measurement data regarding driving behavior of normal drivers.

Slide prepared by the AEBS informal group chair based on a proposal from Germany.

Proposal to allow for virtual testing of AEBS.

Update working draft prepared by the AEBS informal group chair.

Proposal to improve the robustness of the test procedure, including number of test runs and analysis of failures.

Proposal to improve the robustness of the test procedure, including number of test runs and assessment of failures.

AEBS informal working group draft proposal for GRVA to address the possibility of electronic stability control deactivation by the driver.

Proposal to clarify that the AEBS may be automatically deactivated in the event that the electronic stability control system is deactivated.

Proposal from the AEBS informal group to improve the assessment of AEBS robustness, to delete the clause “for subject vehicle and target vehicle”, and add a reference to paragraph 5.2.1.4. in paragraph 6.10.2.

Proposal to delete the clause “for subject vehicle and target vehicle” and add a reference to paragraph 5.2.1.4. in paragraph 6.10.2.

Input on car-to-bicycle, false reaction avoidance, temporary deactivation provisions.

Presentation of data regarding cyclist braking for use in defining car-to-cyclist AEB parameters.

Proposal to introduce new and enhanced requirements for the car-to-pedestrian test scenario. These requirements would be phased in from May 2024.