17 Dec 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
Cybersecurity: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
|
Date: 02 Dec 19
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA-05-16 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft UN Regulation
GRVA-05-05 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft UN Regulation
WP.29/2020/79 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
WP.29/2020/79 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
Related discussions
25. The expert from the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, Co-Chair of the Task Force (TF) on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air issues (CS/OTA), presented the outcome of the TF. He introduced the proposed draft UN Regulation on Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management System (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/2 (withdrawn), ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/3 amended by GRVA-05-05). He mentioned that the revised proposal entailed a recent proposal from Germany and the European Commission (paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3.) in square brackets. He recalled that the TF was planning to deliver further documents accompanying the UN Regulation: a resolution and an interpretation document. He stated that these documents would be further elaborated during the next session of the TF and would distillate the learnings of the test phase in 2019. He informed GRVA that the work on a UN Global Technical Regulation (GTR) had to start.
26. The expert from Japan introduced GRVA-05-20 proposing amendments to paragraph 7.3.8. on the use of cryptographic modules.
27. The expert from the European Commission introduced GRVA-05-22, aimed at clarifying the consequences of the Cyber Security Management System certificate expiration.
28. The expert from Japan introduced GRVA-05-13, expressing strong objections to the proposed paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. establishing prerequisites to the granting of type approvals not in line with the 1958 Agreement and posing a sovereignty risk. The expert from the Russian Federation expressed a similar position and proposed to draft an alternative proposal.
29. The expert from France introduced, GRVA-05-29 proposing an alternative to the proposed paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. as well as amendments proposal for paragraph 7.4 and Annex 5.
30. The expert from the European Commission introduced a compromise proposal (GRVA-05-42) for paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. aimed at addressing the proposals from Japan and France.
31. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-05-33. He stated that the test phase’s general outcome was the confirmation of the applicability of the former draft. He explained their major concerns with the current text. He mentioned their concerns from the industry point of view regarding the major type approval procedure modifications introduced by paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. and the major delay associated risks.
32. He stated that insufficient considerations were given to existing vehicle architectures and requested the introduction of transitional provisions. He also stated that the reporting provisions were excessive. He called on GRVA to consider these concerns and to resolve them on a consensus basis.
33. The expert from FIGIEFA introduced GRVA-05-15, proposing a process flow for national/regional authorities to define objective minimum compliance criteria for the UNECE cybersecurity regulation and a way forward for aftermarket issues.
34. GRVA reviewed in detail GRVA-05-05, having in mind the presentations received (paragraphs 26-32 above). - GRVA discussed the scope of the draft Regulation (keeping vehicles of Categories S, R, T, O in square brackets).
- GRVA discussed GRVA-05-17 and agreed to keep the proposed paragraph 1.4.
- GRVA agreed that the Regulation and the 1958 Agreement would not be prescribing the mutual recognition, among Contracting Parties, of CSMS (and Software Update Management System) certificates.
- The expert from Singapore requested clarifications concerning the reporting obligations according to the draft Regulation and wondered whether any reporting would only be shared among the Contracting Parties of the 1958 Agreement. The Co-Chair of the TF explained that the current draft did not impose reporting on existing cyber security threats. He explained that there were already information sharing platforms such as Automotive Information Sharing and Analysis Center (AutoISAC) in the United States of America. GRVA invited the TF to address the question raised.
- GRVA resumed discussion on the paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. The expert from the Russian Federation explained that provisions regarding the competencies of Technical Services should be introduced in Schedule 2 to the 1958 Agreement. He added that GRVA-05-42 was not enough and that not trusting Approval Authorities was not a good idea, as it would be time consuming and expensive. He stated that the Database for Exchange of Type Approval documentation (DETA) could have a useful role to play, that the TF could be entitled to learn from type approvals and propose relevant Regulation amendments to GRVA, as necessary, and he proposed the corresponding regulatory wording (GRVA-05-51). The expert from the Republic of Korea stated that these paragraphs could be misused. The expert from CEN proposed an alternative procedure based on the so-called common criteria approach and referred to WP.29-179-28 and WP.29-179-29. The TF Co-Chair noted that the common criteria approach was not complete. The expert from FIA introduced GRVA-05-16. GRVA requested the TF to provide comments on this document. GRVA noted to availability of GRVA-05-02 reproducing ISO/SAE DIS 21434 addressing aspects of the draft Regulation but not the mutual recognition aspect.
35. The Secretary produced a consolidation of the draft Regulation based on the input received during the session (GRVA-05-05/Rev.1). GRVA agreed to use this consolidation as a basis for further work until the next GRVA session.
|
GRVA/2020/2
|
2019-12-17 |
2019-12-17 17:49:42 UTC |
GRVA/2020/0002
|
17 Dec 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
Cybersecurity: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
|
Date: 02 Dec 19
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-17-12 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft UN Regulation
TFCS-17-14/Rev.1 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft UN Regulation
TFCS-17-24/Rev.1 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft UN Regulation
TFCS-17-20 | Cybersecurity: Consolidation of proposed amendments to GRVA/2020/3
TFCS-17-33 | Cybersecurity: Comments on the proposed UN Regulation
TFCS-17-20/Rev.1 | Cybersecurity: Consolidation of proposed amendments to GRVA/2020/3
TFCS-17-20/Rev.2 | Cybersecurity: Consolidation of proposed amendments to GRVA/2020/3
GRVA-05-05 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft UN Regulation
GRVA-05-16 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft UN Regulation
Related discussions
25. The expert from the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, Co-Chair of the Task Force (TF) on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air issues (CS/OTA), presented the outcome of the TF. He introduced the proposed draft UN Regulation on Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management System (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/2 (withdrawn), ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/3 amended by GRVA-05-05). He mentioned that the revised proposal entailed a recent proposal from Germany and the European Commission (paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3.) in square brackets. He recalled that the TF was planning to deliver further documents accompanying the UN Regulation: a resolution and an interpretation document. He stated that these documents would be further elaborated during the next session of the TF and would distillate the learnings of the test phase in 2019. He informed GRVA that the work on a UN Global Technical Regulation (GTR) had to start.
26. The expert from Japan introduced GRVA-05-20 proposing amendments to paragraph 7.3.8. on the use of cryptographic modules.
27. The expert from the European Commission introduced GRVA-05-22, aimed at clarifying the consequences of the Cyber Security Management System certificate expiration.
28. The expert from Japan introduced GRVA-05-13, expressing strong objections to the proposed paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. establishing prerequisites to the granting of type approvals not in line with the 1958 Agreement and posing a sovereignty risk. The expert from the Russian Federation expressed a similar position and proposed to draft an alternative proposal.
29. The expert from France introduced, GRVA-05-29 proposing an alternative to the proposed paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. as well as amendments proposal for paragraph 7.4 and Annex 5.
30. The expert from the European Commission introduced a compromise proposal (GRVA-05-42) for paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. aimed at addressing the proposals from Japan and France.
31. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-05-33. He stated that the test phase’s general outcome was the confirmation of the applicability of the former draft. He explained their major concerns with the current text. He mentioned their concerns from the industry point of view regarding the major type approval procedure modifications introduced by paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. and the major delay associated risks.
32. He stated that insufficient considerations were given to existing vehicle architectures and requested the introduction of transitional provisions. He also stated that the reporting provisions were excessive. He called on GRVA to consider these concerns and to resolve them on a consensus basis.
33. The expert from FIGIEFA introduced GRVA-05-15, proposing a process flow for national/regional authorities to define objective minimum compliance criteria for the UNECE cybersecurity regulation and a way forward for aftermarket issues.
34. GRVA reviewed in detail GRVA-05-05, having in mind the presentations received (paragraphs 26-32 above). - GRVA discussed the scope of the draft Regulation (keeping vehicles of Categories S, R, T, O in square brackets).
- GRVA discussed GRVA-05-17 and agreed to keep the proposed paragraph 1.4.
- GRVA agreed that the Regulation and the 1958 Agreement would not be prescribing the mutual recognition, among Contracting Parties, of CSMS (and Software Update Management System) certificates.
- The expert from Singapore requested clarifications concerning the reporting obligations according to the draft Regulation and wondered whether any reporting would only be shared among the Contracting Parties of the 1958 Agreement. The Co-Chair of the TF explained that the current draft did not impose reporting on existing cyber security threats. He explained that there were already information sharing platforms such as Automotive Information Sharing and Analysis Center (AutoISAC) in the United States of America. GRVA invited the TF to address the question raised.
- GRVA resumed discussion on the paragraphs 5.3.1.-5.3.3. The expert from the Russian Federation explained that provisions regarding the competencies of Technical Services should be introduced in Schedule 2 to the 1958 Agreement. He added that GRVA-05-42 was not enough and that not trusting Approval Authorities was not a good idea, as it would be time consuming and expensive. He stated that the Database for Exchange of Type Approval documentation (DETA) could have a useful role to play, that the TF could be entitled to learn from type approvals and propose relevant Regulation amendments to GRVA, as necessary, and he proposed the corresponding regulatory wording (GRVA-05-51). The expert from the Republic of Korea stated that these paragraphs could be misused. The expert from CEN proposed an alternative procedure based on the so-called common criteria approach and referred to WP.29-179-28 and WP.29-179-29. The TF Co-Chair noted that the common criteria approach was not complete. The expert from FIA introduced GRVA-05-16. GRVA requested the TF to provide comments on this document. GRVA noted to availability of GRVA-05-02 reproducing ISO/SAE DIS 21434 addressing aspects of the draft Regulation but not the mutual recognition aspect.
35. The Secretary produced a consolidation of the draft Regulation based on the input received during the session (GRVA-05-05/Rev.1). GRVA agreed to use this consolidation as a basis for further work until the next GRVA session.
|
GRVA/2020/3
|
2019-12-17 |
2019-12-17 17:52:10 UTC |
GRVA/2020/0003
|
17 Dec 2019
|
ISO/SAE DIS 21434 Road vehicles — Cybersecurity engineering (ISO and SAE)
ISO/SAE DIS 21434 Road vehicles — Cybersecurity engineering
|
Description
|
Protected with a password for use by GRVA stakeholders: contact the secretariat for access.
|
Submitted by: ISO and SAE
|
Date: 17 Dec 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-05-02
|
2019-12-17 |
2019-12-17 19:43:03 UTC |
GRVA-05-0002
|
18 Nov 2019
|
Draft UN Regulation on Cyber Security-01 series (consolidated)
Draft UN Regulation on Cyber Security-01 series (consolidated)
|
Date: 18 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-17-35 | Cybersecurity: ISO TC22/SC32/WG11 coherence check of the draft UN Regulation (TFCS-16-37/Rev1)
|
TFCS-16-37/Rev.1
|
2019-11-18 |
2019-11-18 17:15:58 UTC |
TFCS-16-0037/Rev.1
|
18 Nov 2019
|
Draft UN Regulation on Cyber Security-00 Series (clean version)
Draft UN Regulation on Cyber Security-00 Series (clean version)
|
Date: 18 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-38/Rev.1
|
2019-11-18 |
2019-11-18 17:14:36 UTC |
TFCS-16-0038/Rev.1
|
18 Nov 2019
|
ISO/AWI TS 21184 Intelligent transport systems — Management of messages containing information of sensor and control networks specified in data dictionaries (ISO)
ISO/AWI TS 21184 Intelligent transport systems — Management of messages containing information of sensor and control networks specified in data dictionaries
|
Description
|
Password protected: WP29_179
|
Submitted by: ISO
|
Date: 14 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-179-32
|
2019-11-18 |
2019-11-18 15:23:04 UTC |
WP.29-179-0032
|
18 Nov 2019
|
ISO/TS 21185 Intelligent transport systems -- Communication profiles for secure connections between trusted devices (ISO)
ISO/TS 21185 Intelligent transport systems -- Communication profiles for secure connections between trusted devices
|
Description
|
Password protected: WP29_179
|
Submitted by: ISO
|
Date: 14 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-179-31
|
2019-11-18 |
2019-11-18 15:19:47 UTC |
WP.29-179-0031
|
18 Nov 2019
|
ISO 21217:2014 Intelligent transport systems — Communications access for land mobiles (CALM) — Architecture (ISO)
ISO 21217:2014 Intelligent transport systems — Communications access for land mobiles (CALM) — Architecture
|
Description
|
Password protected: WP29_179
|
Submitted by: ISO
|
Date: 14 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-179-30
|
2019-11-18 |
2019-11-18 15:16:38 UTC |
WP.29-179-0030
|
18 Nov 2019
|
ISO/TS 21177:2019 Intelligent transport systems (ISO)
ISO/TS 21177:2019 Intelligent transport systems
|
Description
|
Password protected: WP29_179
|
Submitted by: ISO
|
Date: 14 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-179-29
|
2019-11-18 |
2019-11-18 15:14:28 UTC |
WP.29-179-0029
|
18 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity: How ISO 21217 works (CEN and ISO)
Cybersecurity: How ISO 21217 works
|
Submitted by: CEN and ISO
|
Date: 14 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-179-28
|
2019-11-18 |
2019-11-18 14:59:43 UTC |
WP.29-179-0028
|
18 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity: CEN/ISO standards solutions (CEN)
Cybersecurity: CEN/ISO standards solutions
|
Description
|
“Practicable, workable, acceptable solutions for cybersecurity for connected vehicles through the use of CEN/ISO Standards”.
|
Submitted by: CEN
|
Date: 14 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-179-27
|
2019-11-18 |
2019-11-18 14:52:45 UTC |
WP.29-179-0027
|
13 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity UN Regulation: Proposals for the 00 and 01 series of amendments (OICA)
Cybersecurity UN Regulation: Proposals for the 00 and 01 series of amendments
|
Description
|
Amendments to para 7.3. “Requirements for vehicle types”, transitional provisions, and “high-risk vehicles”;
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 12 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-18/Rev.1
|
2019-11-13 |
2019-11-13 09:41:33 UTC |
TFCS-16-0018/Rev.1
|
13 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity UN Regulation draft text: Consolidated comments after first day of TFCS-16
Cybersecurity UN Regulation draft text: Consolidated comments after first day of TFCS-16
|
Date: 12 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-31/Rev.1
|
2019-11-13 |
2019-11-13 09:18:47 UTC |
TFCS-16-0031/Rev.1
|
12 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity and Software Update Processes: Report on the UN Regulations validation test phase
Cybersecurity and Software Update Processes: Report on the UN Regulations validation test phase
|
Date: 11 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-179-24
|
2019-11-12 |
2019-10-31 17:54:44 UTC |
WP.29-179-0024
|
11 Nov 2019
|
GRVA report on CS/OTA test phase
GRVA report on CS/OTA test phase
|
Description
|
Report on the cybersecurity and software updates procedures validation test phase prepared by the co-chairs based on minutes of TFCS 15 and TPCM2.
|
Date: 11 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-16/Rev.3
|
2019-11-11 |
2019-10-25 16:45:05 UTC |
TFCS-16-0016/Rev.3
|
11 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity regulation Technical Service requirements (RDW)
Cybersecurity regulation Technical Service requirements
|
Submitted by: RDW
|
Date: 11 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-33
|
2019-11-11 |
2019-11-11 14:56:35 UTC |
TFCS-16-0033
|
11 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity UN Resolution draft text: Consolidated comments
Cybersecurity UN Resolution draft text: Consolidated comments
|
Date: 11 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-17-25/Rev.1 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft Resolution
|
TFCS-16-32
|
2019-11-11 |
2019-11-11 14:53:27 UTC |
TFCS-16-0032
|
11 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity UN Regulation draft text: Consolidated comments
Cybersecurity UN Regulation draft text: Consolidated comments
|
Date: 11 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-31
|
2019-11-11 |
2019-11-11 14:51:47 UTC |
TFCS-16-0031
|
8 Nov 2019
|
Consumer views on automated and connected vehicles (FIA Foundation)
Consumer views on automated and connected vehicles
|
Submitted by: FIA Foundation
|
Date: 08 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-179-18
|
2019-11-08 |
2019-11-09 11:42:12 UTC |
WP.29-179-0018
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Examples fof statements that could be used to aid cybersecurity management system assessments
Examples fof statements that could be used to aid cybersecurity management system assessments
|
Description
|
Input from the task force chair.
|
Date: 07 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-28
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:43:02 UTC |
TFCS-16-0028
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Proposal for amendments to the draft Cybersecurity Resolution/Regulation (CITA, EGEA, ETRMA, FIA Foundation, and FIGIEFA)
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-16-08/Rev.1 | Draft text of the proposed Cybersecurity Recommendations and UN Regulation
|
TFCS-16-27
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:36:04 UTC |
TFCS-16-0027
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Template for cybersecurity regulation Declaration of Compliance (OICA and UK)
Template for cybersecurity regulation Declaration of Compliance
|
Description
|
Draft “Manufacturer’s declaration of compliance with the requirements for the Cyber Security Management System”
|
Submitted by: OICA and UK
|
Date: 07 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-26
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:31:34 UTC |
TFCS-16-0026
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Comments on draft cybersecurity resolution/regulation (NHTSA)
Comments on draft cybersecurity resolution/regulation
|
Submitted by: NHTSA
|
Date: 07 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-16-08/Rev.1 | Draft text of the proposed Cybersecurity Recommendations and UN Regulation
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
Related discussions
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
|
TFCS-16-25
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:26:33 UTC |
TFCS-16-0025
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Comments on proposal for document handling for approvals (NHTSA)
Comments on proposal for document handling for approvals
|
Submitted by: NHTSA
|
Date: 07 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-16-07 | Cybersecurity: Text from UN R79 regarding documentation and "extended information"
|
TFCS-16-24
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:23:01 UTC |
TFCS-16-0024
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Comments on document TFCS-16-08/Rev.1 (Netherlands)
Comments on document TFCS-16-08/Rev.1
|
Description
|
Comments on the draft cybersecurity regulation.
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Date: 07 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
TFCS-16-08/Rev.1 | Draft text of the proposed Cybersecurity Recommendations and UN Regulation
Related discussions
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
|
TFCS-16-22
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:17:00 UTC |
TFCS-16-0022
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Preamble proposal for cybersecurity resolution draft
Preamble proposal for cybersecurity resolution draft
|
Description
|
UNECE WP.29 secretariat proposal
|
Date: 07 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-20
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:11:07 UTC |
TFCS-16-0020
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Comments on the draft cybersecurity regulation (TFCS-16-11) (UNISS)
Comments on the draft cybersecurity regulation (TFCS-16-11)
|
Submitted by: UNISS
|
Date: 07 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-19
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-11-11 14:09:24 UTC |
TFCS-16-0019
|
7 Nov 2019
|
Cybersecurity draft regulation: UK amendment (UK)
Cybersecurity draft regulation: UK amendment
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Date: 07 Nov 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-15
|
2019-11-07 |
2019-10-25 16:53:23 UTC |
TFCS-16-0015
|
31 Oct 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal for para. 7.3 in the draft (00 series) UN Regulation (OICA)
Cybersecurity: Proposal for para. 7.3 in the draft (00 series) UN Regulation
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 31 Oct 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-18
|
2019-10-31 |
2019-10-31 17:29:43 UTC |
TFCS-16-0018
|
31 Oct 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Comments on document GRVA/2019/2 (UNISS)
Cybersecurity: Comments on document GRVA/2019/2
|
Submitted by: UNISS
|
Date: 31 Oct 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
Related discussions
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
|
TFCS-16-17
|
2019-10-31 |
2019-10-31 17:24:55 UTC |
TFCS-16-0017
|
23 Oct 2019
|
Draft text for a new UN Regulation on cybersecurity
Draft text for a new UN Regulation on cybersecurity
|
Date: 23 Oct 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-11
|
2019-10-23 |
2019-10-23 18:13:34 UTC |
TFCS-16-0011
|
23 Oct 2019
|
Draft text for a UN Resolution on Cybersecurity
Draft text for a UN Resolution on Cybersecurity
|
Date: 23 Oct 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-10
|
2019-10-23 |
2019-10-23 18:12:41 UTC |
TFCS-16-0010
|
23 Oct 2019
|
Draft text of the proposed Cybersecurity Recommendations and UN Regulation
Draft text of the proposed Cybersecurity Recommendations and UN Regulation
|
Date: 23 Oct 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-16-25 | Comments on draft cybersecurity resolution/regulation
TFCS-16-22 | Comments on document TFCS-16-08/Rev.1
TFCS-16-27 | Proposal for amendments to the draft Cybersecurity Resolution/Regulation
|
TFCS-16-08/Rev.1
|
2019-10-23 |
2019-10-23 18:10:09 UTC |
TFCS-16-0008/Rev.1
|
27 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity/Software Updates task force update
Cybersecurity/Software Updates task force update
|
Date: 27 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-04-45
|
2019-09-27 |
2019-09-27 08:37:52 UTC |
GRVA-04-0045
|
27 Sep 2019
|
GRVA activity priorities
GRVA activity priorities
|
Date: 27 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-04-49
|
2019-09-27 |
2019-09-27 08:24:02 UTC |
GRVA-04-0049
|
25 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2019/2 (EC)
Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2019/2
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Date: 25 Sep 19
|
Status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-04-32
|
2019-09-25 |
2019-12-02 17:50:25 UTC |
GRVA-04-0032
|
25 Sep 2019
|
FIA position on Lifecycle of a vehicle type vs. Lifetime of a vehicle (FIA Foundation)
FIA position on Lifecycle of a vehicle type vs. Lifetime of a vehicle
|
Submitted by: FIA Foundation
|
Date: 25 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-04-40
|
2019-09-25 |
2019-09-25 13:04:56 UTC |
GRVA-04-0040
|
22 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2019/2 (Germany)
Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2019/2
|
Description
|
Proposal from Germany to introduce additional definitions, clarify the management system certification process, enable the withdrawal (revocation) of a vehicle type approval, to require the vehicle manufacturer to maintain an Information Security Operations Centre (ISOC) to handle servicing of its vehicle fleet, and to improve the processes for identification of risks and threats and their mitigation.
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 20 Sep 19
|
Status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-04-22
|
2019-09-22 |
2019-09-22 16:41:56 UTC |
GRVA-04-0022
|
22 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity/Software Updates: Proposal to amend GRVA/2019/2 and GRVA/2019/3 (IMMA)
Cybersecurity/Software Updates: Proposal to amend GRVA/2019/2 and GRVA/2019/3
|
Description
|
Proposal to temporarily remove Category L vehicles from the scope of the draft cyber-security and software update processes UN Regulations.
|
Submitted by: IMMA
|
Date: 20 Sep 19
|
Status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
GRVA/2019/3 | Recommendation on Software Updates
TFCS-15-34 | Cybersecurity: Draft Recommendations and UN Regulation
TFCS-15-36 | Software update processes: Draft recommendations and UN Regulation proposal
Related discussions
17. Due to lack of time, GRVA did not consider ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/13, describing the principles of the “Three-Pillar Approach”, proposed by the experts from OICA (see GRVA-02-09 and GRVA-02-27).
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
27. GRVA noted that the presentation of GRVA-02-03 also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3, that the proposal for a test phase would also apply to the software updates work stream. The expert from Japan also supported the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3. He indicated Japan’s support for the earliest adoption (during this session), since the issue was important and a UN Regulation was needed for the improvement of vehicle safety.
28. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
29. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of Category L from the scope of the document.
30. The expert from ITU stated that regulating communication would require specific expertise and that the precedent at the Working Party on General Safety provisions with the UN Regulation No. 144 (Accident Emergency Call Systems) ignored communication aspects and durability provisions. He raised the question whether a vehicle equipped with safety systems based on communication would still be roadworthy in case the communication would no longer function e.g. when the communication system would be obsolete. GRVA agreed that the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates was a good example demonstrating that WP.29 was able to attract the required experts with the right expertise and to make very quick progress on such strategic issues. GRVA agreed about the need to discuss the roadworthiness of vehicles in case of the vehicle communication unit obsolescence would impact the well performing of safety systems.
31. GRVA agreed to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3 and GRVA-01-18 on the agenda of the next GRVA session.
|
GRVA-04-25
|
2019-09-22 |
2019-09-22 16:14:09 UTC |
GRVA-04-0025
|
21 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2019/2 (CITA, EGEA, ETRMA, FIA Foundation, and FIGIEFA)
Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2019/2
|
Submitted by: CITA, EGEA, ETRMA, FIA Foundation, and FIGIEFA
|
Date: 20 Sep 19
|
Status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-04-04
|
2019-09-21 |
2019-09-21 18:17:33 UTC |
GRVA-04-0004
|
18 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Text from UN R79 regarding documentation and "extended information"
Cybersecurity: Text from UN R79 regarding documentation and "extended information"
|
Description
|
TFCS chair response to task force request to check other regulations for “extended information” provisions.
|
Date: 17 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-16-24 | Comments on proposal for document handling for approvals
|
TFCS-16-07
|
2019-09-18 |
2019-09-18 12:48:14 UTC |
TFCS-16-0007
|
18 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal to modify the proposal concerning data access (EC)
Cybersecurity: Proposal to modify the proposal concerning data access
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Date: 18 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-15-30 | Cybersecurity: Comments on draft regulation and data access
|
TFCS-16-04
|
2019-09-18 |
2019-09-18 12:39:05 UTC |
TFCS-16-0004
|
18 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments concerning vehicle maintenance (CITA, EGEA, ETRMA, FIA Foundation, and FIGIEFA)
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-03
|
2019-09-18 |
2019-09-18 12:35:45 UTC |
TFCS-16-0003
|
18 Sep 2019
|
Report of the 15th Cybersecurity/Software Updates Task Force session
Report of the 15th Cybersecurity/Software Updates Task Force session
|
Date: 18 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-16-02/Rev.2
|
2019-09-18 |
2019-09-09 16:33:57 UTC |
TFCS-16-0002/Rev.2
|
13 Sep 2019
|
Outcomes of TFCS round-robin validation testing (DfT)
Outcomes of TFCS round-robin validation testing
|
Description
|
Summary of the round-robin testing of the proposed Cyber Security and Software Update UN Regulations.
|
Submitted by: DfT
|
Date: 13 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-ahm-02
|
2019-09-13 |
2019-09-18 12:54:22 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-00-0002
|
9 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Draft Recommendations and UN Regulation
Cybersecurity: Draft Recommendations and UN Regulation
|
Description
|
Draft recommendations paper, including the annexed proposal for a new UN type approval regulation, incorporating all amendments through the 15th task force session of August 2019, and formatted for submission to GRVA.
|
Date: 09 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA-04-25 | Cybersecurity/Software Updates: Proposal to amend GRVA/2019/2 and GRVA/2019/3
Related discussions
21. The expert from the United Kingdom, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air software updates (TF CS/OTA) reported on the activities of the group since June 2019. (Details are provided in GRVA-04-45.) He explained the activities of the test phase and reported that it was positive. He stated that the draft proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 as amended) worked and provided value. He mentioned that the experience gathered during this phase would be reflected in an interpretation document and that the documents under development would be improved for consideration at the next session of GRVA.
22. The expert from IMMA introduced GRVA-04-25, proposing amendments to the scope of the draft regulation. GRVA referred the proposal to the Task Force.
23. The expert from Germany provided comments in GRVA-04-22. GRVA agreed to refer them to the Task Force.
24. The expert from the European Commission recalled that a report would have to be prepared for review at the next session of WP.29. He presented a proposal to clarify the scope of the draft UN Regulation on cyber security (GRVA-04-32). He noted that the challenges of the group were similar to those that the IWG on VMAD would face, when working on audits.
25. The expert from the USA commended the Task Force for its work. But she requested that the technical requirements be prepared (as previously agreed) in a document that could serve the 1998 Agreement as well.
26. The expert from Sweden informed that his country had now established a Cyber Security authority. GRVA welcomed the participation of Cyber Security authorities at the Task Force meetings.
27. The expert from FIGIEFA introduced GRVA-04-04 proposing amendments to the scope as well as new proposals related to access to data by authorized parties. She announced that she would support the alternative proposal concerning the scope presented in
GRVA-04-32. The expert from OICA also supported amendments to the scope but not the other amendments proposed in GRVA-04-32. The expert from EC stated the importance to remain vigilant concerning the access to data in vehicles. GRVA transmitted the amendment proposals to the task force.
28. The expert from FIA introduced GRVA-04-40 proposing to clarify the lifecycle and lifetime definitions. He suggested that the lifetime definition should also include the time after a vehicle is deregistered and until it is scrapped. GRVA did not conclude on this item and transmitted the document to the Task Force.
29. GRVA invited the Task Force to prepare the proposal for a new UN Regulation on cyber security, a draft guidance document, a draft resolution with recommendations together with draft requirements in a document that can serve the 1998 Agreement and a report on the test phase.
30. GRVA agreed to request an extension of the mandate of the Task Force for two years.
|
TFCS-15-34
|
2019-09-09 |
2019-09-04 16:14:10 UTC |
TFCS-15-0034
|
9 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Draft recommendations and UN Regulation (highlighting pending items)
Cybersecurity: Draft recommendations and UN Regulation (highlighting pending items)
|
Description
|
Draft text for the cybersecurity recommendations paper and annexed UN type approval regulation, incorporating all amendments through the August 2019 task force session and highlighting those sections pending task force confirmation prior to submission for GRVA approval.
|
Date: 09 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-35
|
2019-09-09 |
2019-09-04 16:18:26 UTC |
TFCS-15-0035
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
|
Date: 03 Sep 19
|
Status: Adopted by WP.29
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 | Proposal to amend the draft AV Framework Document
FRAV-01-13/Rev.1 | Revised list of AV safety elements
WP.29-179-23 | AV Framework Document: Proposal for amendment
WP.29/2020/79 | Cybersecurity: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
WP.29/2020/80 | Software updates: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
Related discussions
25. The representative of Japan introduced, on behalf of China, European Union, Japan and the United States of America, WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 containing amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 – Framework Document on Automated/autonomous Vehicles. He explained that the amendments included editorial amendments as well as a restructured Table 1 containing details on (i) current activities, (ii) expected future activities and (iii) references to the key safety principles mentioned in the document.
26. The representative of the Republic of Korea introduced WP.29-178-19, proposing additional amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34. The representative of Sweden proposed to insert into Table 1 considerations related to para. 4 (j) regarding vehicle inspection. The representative of CITA supported the position of the representative of Sweden.
27. WP.29 adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 as amended by WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 and requested the secretariat to issue it as a reference document with the symbol ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1.
151. The Chair of AC.3 introduced the documents that were considered under this agenda item. AC.3 considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/31/Rev.1, aimed at providing an updated overview of the priorities of the Programme of Work of the development of UN GTRs or amendments to the existing ones taking into account the decisions on document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 from the 177th WP.29 session (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1145, para. 49). AC.3 referred to the discussions on WP.29-178-10/Rev.2, WP.29-178-19, WP.29-178-16/Rev.1, WP.29-178-17/Rev.2 and WP.29-178-18/Rev.1 under agenda item 2.3. Please note that document WP.29-178-17/Rev.2 does not exist. The amended document WP.29-178-17/Rev.1 was reproduced in Annex VI of the session report.
29. The representative of CLEPA presented WP.29-179-23. WP.29 referred this document to GRSP for review at its December 2019 session.
|
WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-08-21 13:59:52 UTC |
WP.29/2019/0034/Rev.1
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Observations on the draft cybersecurity recommendations paper (EC)
Observations on the draft cybersecurity recommendations paper
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Date: 27 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-32
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-09-03 14:41:32 UTC |
TFCS-15-0032
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Comments and interpretations of draft regulation (IDIADA)
Cybersecurity: Comments and interpretations of draft regulation
|
Submitted by: IDIADA
|
Date: 27 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-29
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-09-03 14:39:55 UTC |
TFCS-15-0029
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Comments on draft regulation and data access (ETRMA and FIGIEFA)
Cybersecurity: Comments on draft regulation and data access
|
Submitted by: ETRMA and FIGIEFA
|
Date: 27 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-16-04 | Cybersecurity: Proposal to modify the proposal concerning data access
|
TFCS-15-30
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-09-03 14:37:36 UTC |
TFCS-15-0030
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Comments regarding data access (OICA)
Cybersecurity: Comments regarding data access
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 27 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-31
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-09-03 14:35:03 UTC |
TFCS-15-0031
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Responses to GRVA cybersecurity and software update processes questions (FIA Foundation)
Responses to GRVA cybersecurity and software update processes questions
|
Submitted by: FIA Foundation
|
Date: 27 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-24
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-09-03 14:32:45 UTC |
TFCS-15-0024
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Updated draft cybersecurity recommendations paper
Updated draft cybersecurity recommendations paper
|
Description
|
Incorporating suggested amendments from the German drafting group.
|
Date: 27 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-15-06/Rev.3 | Draft recommendation on cybersecurity
|
TFCS-15-26
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-09-03 13:58:21 UTC |
TFCS-15-0026
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Cybersecurity interpretation document comments
Cybersecurity interpretation document comments
|
Description
|
German drafting group comments.
|
Date: 27 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-28
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-09-03 13:53:39 UTC |
TFCS-15-0028
|
3 Sep 2019
|
Draft recommendation on cybersecurity
Draft recommendation on cybersecurity
|
Description
|
Draft recommendations paper prepared by the CS/OTA chair capturing latest amendments.
|
Date: 02 Sep 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-15-26 | Updated draft cybersecurity recommendations paper
|
TFCS-15-06/Rev.3
|
2019-09-03 |
2019-08-16 16:38:44 UTC |
TFCS-15-0006/Rev.3
|
25 Aug 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft text (CITA, CLEPA, EGEA, ETRMA, FIA Foundation, and FIGIEFA)
Cybersecurity: Proposal for amendments to the draft text
|
Description
|
Proposal to introduce provisions into the cybersecurity recommendations paper and draft UN Regulation addressing access to in-vehicle data, functions and resources by independent aftermarket service providers.
|
Submitted by: CITA, CLEPA, EGEA, ETRMA, FIA Foundation, and FIGIEFA
|
Date: 23 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-23
|
2019-08-25 |
2019-08-25 10:04:43 UTC |
TFCS-15-0023
|
25 Aug 2019
|
Tesla comments on the cyber security regulation interpretation document (Tesla)
Tesla comments on the cyber security regulation interpretation document
|
Submitted by: Tesla
|
Date: 23 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-09/Rev.1
|
2019-08-25 |
2019-08-07 10:34:16 UTC |
TFCS-15-0009/Rev.1
|
25 Aug 2019
|
Cybersecurity and Software Update Processes: Overview of the Small Drafting Group output
Cybersecurity and Software Update Processes: Overview of the Small Drafting Group output
|
Date: 23 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-11
|
2019-08-25 |
2019-08-16 16:39:18 UTC |
TFCS-15-0011
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend the draft UN Regulation text
Cybersecurity: Proposal to amend the draft UN Regulation text
|
Description
|
Proposal from the TFCS secretary to amend the text of Annex A to document GRVA/2019/2.
|
Date: 16 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
Related discussions
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
|
TFCS-15-05
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-07 10:33:18 UTC |
TFCS-15-0005
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Focus Group on Vehicular Multimedia Architecture liaison statement (ITU)
Focus Group on Vehicular Multimedia Architecture liaison statement
|
Submitted by: ITU
|
Date: 12 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-15
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-16 16:45:44 UTC |
TFCS-15-0015
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Attachment 2 to the Vehicular Multimedia Architecture liaison statement (ITU)
Attachment 2 to the Vehicular Multimedia Architecture liaison statement
|
Description
|
FGVM-O-022: “Draft Technical Report on “Use Cases and Requirements for Vehicular Multimedia”
|
Submitted by: ITU
|
Date: 12 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-17
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-16 16:49:58 UTC |
TFCS-15-0017
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Attachment 1 to the Vehicular Multimedia Architecture liaison statement (ITU)
Attachment 1 to the Vehicular Multimedia Architecture liaison statement
|
Description
|
FGVM-O-020: “Call for Proposals for an internationally agreed Vehicular Multimedia Architecture”
|
Submitted by: ITU
|
Date: 12 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-16
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-16 16:48:02 UTC |
TFCS-15-0016
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Cybersecurity UN Regulation: draft 01 series of amendments (v.1) (OICA)
Cybersecurity UN Regulation: draft 01 series of amendments (v.1)
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 16 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-14
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-16 16:43:20 UTC |
TFCS-15-0014
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Cybersecurity UN Regulation: draft 00 series of amendments (v.1) (OICA)
Cybersecurity UN Regulation: draft 00 series of amendments (v.1)
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 16 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-13
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-16 16:42:21 UTC |
TFCS-15-0013
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Cybersecurity implementation issues on existing vehicle architectures (v.3) (OICA)
Cybersecurity implementation issues on existing vehicle architectures (v.3)
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 16 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-12
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-16 16:40:47 UTC |
TFCS-15-0012
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Comments on cybersecurity draft regulation with regard to cyber-threats and risk control (OICA)
Comments on cybersecurity draft regulation with regard to cyber-threats and risk control
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 16 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-10
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-07 10:33:45 UTC |
TFCS-15-0010
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Minutes of the 2nd TFCS Test Phase Coordination meeting
Minutes of the 2nd TFCS Test Phase Coordination meeting
|
Date: 16 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-02/Rev.1
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-07 10:24:12 UTC |
TFCS-15-0002/Rev.1
|
16 Aug 2019
|
Cyber security regulation interpretation document: Small Drafting Group outcome
Cyber security regulation interpretation document: Small Drafting Group outcome
|
Date: 16 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-03
|
2019-08-16 |
2019-08-07 10:32:24 UTC |
TFCS-15-0003
|
6 Aug 2019
|
Proposal for answer to GRVA Cybersecurity/Software Updates tasks and questions (UK)
Proposal for answer to GRVA Cybersecurity/Software Updates tasks and questions
|
Description
|
Reissued on 16 August for filing reasons.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Date: 06 Aug 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-22
|
2019-08-06 |
2019-08-07 10:31:17 UTC |
TFCS-15-0022
|
29 Jul 2019
|
GRVA tasks and questions for the Cybersecurity/Software Updates task force
GRVA tasks and questions for the Cybersecurity/Software Updates task force
|
Description
|
Reissued on 16 August for filing reasons.
|
Date: 29 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-21
|
2019-07-29 |
2019-08-07 10:29:47 UTC |
TFCS-15-0021
|
29 Jul 2019
|
Cybersecurity and Software Updates Test Phase Final Report (RDW)
Cybersecurity and Software Updates Test Phase Final Report
|
Description
|
Reissued on 16 August for filing reasons.
|
Submitted by: RDW
|
Date: 29 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-07
|
2019-07-29 |
2019-08-07 10:26:05 UTC |
TFCS-15-0007
|
29 Jul 2019
|
Recommendations for the Cybersecurity Regulation interpretation document (Tesla)
Recommendations for the Cybersecurity Regulation interpretation document
|
Description
|
Reissued on 16 August for filing reasons.
|
Submitted by: Tesla
|
Date: 29 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-15-08
|
2019-07-29 |
2019-08-07 10:28:04 UTC |
TFCS-15-0008
|
24 Jul 2019
|
CS/OTA: Lifecycle of vehicle type and lifetime of vehicles
CS/OTA: Lifecycle of vehicle type and lifetime of vehicles
|
Date: 18 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-16
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:46:33 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-16
|
24 Jul 2019
|
Netherlands report on validation of Cybersecurity regulation (Netherlands and RDW)
Netherlands report on validation of Cybersecurity regulation
|
Submitted by: Netherlands and RDW
|
Date: 17 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-12
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:37:18 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-12
|
24 Jul 2019
|
CS/OTA: Overview of initial findings from validation trials and next steps
CS/OTA: Overview of initial findings from validation trials and next steps
|
Date: 18 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-14
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:42:29 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-14
|
24 Jul 2019
|
Korea comments on cybersecurity and software updates draft regulations (Korea)
Korea comments on cybersecurity and software updates draft regulations
|
Submitted by: Korea
|
Date: 17 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-13
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:39:20 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-13
|
24 Jul 2019
|
CS/OTA: Minutes of the June 2019 interpretation documents ad hoc meetings
CS/OTA: Minutes of the June 2019 interpretation documents ad hoc meetings
|
Date: 17 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-11
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:35:30 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-11
|
24 Jul 2019
|
Overview of Cybersecurity and Software Update Processes Small Drafting Group work
Overview of Cybersecurity and Software Update Processes Small Drafting Group work
|
Date: 17 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-10
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:33:39 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-10
|
24 Jul 2019
|
Interpretation document for Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of cyber security
Interpretation document for Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of cyber security
|
Date: 16 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-08
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:30:05 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-08
|
24 Jul 2019
|
Input for Cybersecurity/Software Update Processes regulations test phase (CLEPA and OICA)
Input for Cybersecurity/Software Update Processes regulations test phase
|
Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA
|
Date: 16 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-06
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:25:56 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-06
|
24 Jul 2019
|
CS/OTA: Experiences during the test phase with the draft regulations (Germany and KBA)
CS/OTA: Experiences during the test phase with the draft regulations
|
Submitted by: Germany and KBA
|
Date: 16 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-05
|
2019-07-24 |
2019-07-24 13:22:09 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-05
|
15 Jul 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Gap analysis UNECE versus ISO/SAE 21434
Cybersecurity: Gap analysis UNECE versus ISO/SAE 21434
|
Date: 14 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-04
|
2019-07-15 |
2019-07-15 01:17:14 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-04
|
15 Jul 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Validation test phase report from Japan (Japan)
Cybersecurity: Validation test phase report from Japan
|
Submitted by: Japan
|
Date: 14 Jul 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-02
|
2019-07-15 |
2019-07-15 01:07:01 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-02
|
1 Jul 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Interpretation document draft pursuant to ad hoc session 3
Cybersecurity: Interpretation document draft pursuant to ad hoc session 3
|
Date: 28 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS3-02
|
2019-07-01 |
2019-07-01 12:06:54 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS3-02
|
26 Jun 2019
|
Proposal to amend the draft AV Framework Document (China, EU, Japan, and USA)
Proposal to amend the draft AV Framework Document
|
Submitted by: China, EU, Japan, and USA
|
Date: 26 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2019/34 | Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1 | Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
Related discussions
25. The representative of Japan introduced, on behalf of China, European Union, Japan and the United States of America, WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 containing amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 – Framework Document on Automated/autonomous Vehicles. He explained that the amendments included editorial amendments as well as a restructured Table 1 containing details on (i) current activities, (ii) expected future activities and (iii) references to the key safety principles mentioned in the document.
26. The representative of the Republic of Korea introduced WP.29-178-19, proposing additional amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34. The representative of Sweden proposed to insert into Table 1 considerations related to para. 4 (j) regarding vehicle inspection. The representative of CITA supported the position of the representative of Sweden.
27. WP.29 adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 as amended by WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 and requested the secretariat to issue it as a reference document with the symbol ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1.
|
WP.29-178-10/Rev.2
|
2019-06-26 |
2019-06-20 08:45:05 UTC |
WP.29-178-0010/Rev.2
|
25 Jun 2019
|
Proposal for amendments to framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles (Korea)
Proposal for amendments to framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
|
Submitted by: Korea
|
Date: 24 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2019/34 | Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
Related discussions
25. The representative of Japan introduced, on behalf of China, European Union, Japan and the United States of America, WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 containing amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 – Framework Document on Automated/autonomous Vehicles. He explained that the amendments included editorial amendments as well as a restructured Table 1 containing details on (i) current activities, (ii) expected future activities and (iii) references to the key safety principles mentioned in the document.
26. The representative of the Republic of Korea introduced WP.29-178-19, proposing additional amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34. The representative of Sweden proposed to insert into Table 1 considerations related to para. 4 (j) regarding vehicle inspection. The representative of CITA supported the position of the representative of Sweden.
27. WP.29 adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 as amended by WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 and requested the secretariat to issue it as a reference document with the symbol ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1.
|
WP.29-178-19
|
2019-06-25 |
2019-06-25 09:01:09 UTC |
WP.29-178-0019
|
24 Jun 2019
|
Draft agenda for the 3rd CS/OTA test phase ad hoc session on cybersecurity
Draft agenda for the 3rd CS/OTA test phase ad hoc session on cybersecurity
|
Date: 20 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS3-01
|
2019-06-24 |
2019-06-24 10:01:47 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS3-01
|
16 Jun 2019
|
AV safety elements and the Multi-Pillar Approach to certification (CLEPA and OICA)
AV safety elements and the Multi-Pillar Approach to certification
|
Description
|
Matrix illustrating a possible way that use of simulation, track, and real world testing might be applied to the various automated vehicle safety elements identified by WP.29 Contracting Parties.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA
|
Date: 14 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-03-23
|
2019-06-16 |
2019-06-16 12:27:10 UTC |
GRVA-03-0023
|
12 Jun 2019
|
Cybersecurity interpretation document: 12 June 2019 ad hoc session outcome
Cybersecurity interpretation document: 12 June 2019 ad hoc session outcome
|
Date: 12 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
ad hoc session 2 on Cybersecurity-08
|
2019-06-12 |
2019-06-12 17:14:37 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-03-0008
|
12 Jun 2019
|
General information for the 2nd TFCS test phase coordination meeting
General information for the 2nd TFCS test phase coordination meeting
|
Date: 12 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-02-00
|
2019-06-12 |
2019-06-12 10:53:56 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-02-0000
|
11 Jun 2019
|
Cybersecurity regulation interpretation document-combined comments (UK)
Cybersecurity regulation interpretation document-combined comments
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Date: 10 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS2-07
|
2019-06-11 |
2019-06-11 08:08:30 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS2-07
|
3 Jun 2019
|
Cybersecurity: FIGIEFA responses to the EC on the draft regulation (FIGIEFA)
Cybersecurity: FIGIEFA responses to the EC on the draft regulation
|
Submitted by: FIGIEFA
|
Date: 03 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA-02-37 | Cybersecurity: Comments on document GRVA/2019/2
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
Related discussions
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
27. GRVA noted that the presentation of GRVA-02-03 also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3, that the proposal for a test phase would also apply to the software updates work stream. The expert from Japan also supported the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3. He indicated Japan’s support for the earliest adoption (during this session), since the issue was important and a UN Regulation was needed for the improvement of vehicle safety.
28. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
29. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of Category L from the scope of the document.
30. The expert from ITU stated that regulating communication would require specific expertise and that the precedent at the Working Party on General Safety provisions with the UN Regulation No. 144 (Accident Emergency Call Systems) ignored communication aspects and durability provisions. He raised the question whether a vehicle equipped with safety systems based on communication would still be roadworthy in case the communication would no longer function e.g. when the communication system would be obsolete. GRVA agreed that the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates was a good example demonstrating that WP.29 was able to attract the required experts with the right expertise and to make very quick progress on such strategic issues. GRVA agreed about the need to discuss the roadworthiness of vehicles in case of the vehicle communication unit obsolescence would impact the well performing of safety systems.
31. GRVA agreed to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3 and GRVA-01-18 on the agenda of the next GRVA session.
|
GRVA-03-16
|
2019-06-03 |
2019-06-03 12:50:29 UTC |
GRVA-03-0016
|
3 Jun 2019
|
Cybersecurity: EC comments on the draft UN Regulation (EC)
Cybersecurity: EC comments on the draft UN Regulation
|
Description
|
Comments on document GRVA/2019/2.
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Date: 03 Jun 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
Related discussions
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
|
GRVA-03-14
|
2019-06-03 |
2019-06-03 12:41:27 UTC |
GRVA-03-0014
|
3 Jun 2019
|
CLEPA comments on the cybersecurity interpretation paper (CLEPA)
CLEPA comments on the cybersecurity interpretation paper
|
Submitted by: CLEPA
|
Date: 31 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS2-06
|
2019-06-03 |
2019-06-03 10:12:49 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS2-06
|
3 Jun 2019
|
UK comments on cybersecurity interpretation document (UK)
UK comments on cybersecurity interpretation document
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Date: 31 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS2-05
|
2019-06-03 |
2019-06-03 08:39:44 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS2-05
|
31 May 2019
|
Proposal for an Informal Working Group on Cyber Security and (Over-the-Air) Software-Updates (Germany)
Proposal for an Informal Working Group on Cyber Security and (Over-the-Air) Software-Updates
|
Description
|
This document is based upon a CS/OTA task force document (TFCS-03-04) and is also available with tracked changes against this original task force draft in pdf format and docx format.
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 31 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-03-13
|
2019-05-31 |
2019-05-31 16:00:49 UTC |
GRVA-03-0013
|
31 May 2019
|
Delivery of WP.29 Priorities for Vehicle Automated Driving Systems
Delivery of WP.29 Priorities for Vehicle Automated Driving Systems
|
Description
|
Submission from the GRVA chair.
|
Date: 31 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-03-10
|
2019-05-31 |
2019-05-31 15:52:11 UTC |
GRVA-03-0010
|
29 May 2019
|
Cybersecurity and Software Updates: Working paper on decisions to be made by GRVA
Cybersecurity and Software Updates: Working paper on decisions to be made by GRVA
|
Description
|
Request for decisions on the schedule for eventual adoption of new regulations for the approval of vehicles with regard to cybersecurity and software updates.
|
Date: 28 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-03-08
|
2019-05-29 |
2019-05-29 08:03:14 UTC |
GRVA-03-0008
|
23 May 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Updated draft recommendations paper
Cybersecurity: Updated draft recommendations paper
|
Description
|
Draft Recommendation on Cyber Security updated to capture suggestions from participants in the draft UN Regulation validation test phase.
|
Date: 23 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS2-04
|
2019-05-23 |
2019-05-23 15:45:28 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS2-04
|
23 May 2019
|
Cybersecurity interpretation document-clean version
Cybersecurity interpretation document-clean version
|
Date: 16 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS2-03
|
2019-05-23 |
2019-05-23 15:41:54 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS2-03
|
22 May 2019
|
Proposal for amendments to the draft Cybersecurity and Software Updates Recommendations (IMMA)
Proposal for amendments to the draft Cybersecurity and Software Updates Recommendations
|
Submitted by: IMMA
|
Date: 22 May 19
|
Status: Informal GR review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-03-05
|
2019-05-22 |
2019-05-22 15:13:18 UTC |
GRVA-03-0005
|
20 May 2019
|
Overview of the recommendations on cyber security
Overview of the recommendations on cyber security
|
Description
|
Presentation on the work of the Task Force on Cybersecurity and Over-the-Air Software Updates.
|
Date: 17 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-03-02
|
2019-05-20 |
2019-05-20 11:18:31 UTC |
GRVA-03-0002
|
14 May 2019
|
Minutes of the first TFCS-Test Phase ad hoc session on cybersecurity
Minutes of the first TFCS-Test Phase ad hoc session on cybersecurity
|
Date: 13 May 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS2-02
|
2019-05-14 |
2019-05-14 08:49:25 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS2-02
|
18 Apr 2019
|
Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
|
Date: 15 Apr 19
|
Status: Formal WP.29 review
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29-177-19 | Proposal for a framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 | Proposal to amend the draft AV Framework Document
WP.29-178-19 | Proposal for amendments to framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
Related discussions
11. AC.2 reviewed and discussed documents WP.29-177-04 and WP.29-177-08. Following discussions among GR Chairs, Japan offered to merge them into a single framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles to be transmitted to WP.29 for discussion (WP.29-177-19).
25. The representative of the United Kingdom, Chair of GRVA, introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. He proposed to delay the adoption of this document until the review of WP.29-177-19, which was under preparation at that time.
39. The secretariat recalled the series of meetings between December 2018 and March 2019 that led to the preparation of WP.29-177-19 and presented the informal document following which the World Forum had a wide-ranging discussion.
40. The representatives from AAPC, CLEPA, Sweden, and the United States of America offered their views and questions on how the existing ongoing activities were to be included in the document. The representative of the United Kingdom, who had assisted in preparing the document explained that it was aimed at setting the strategic vision for WP.29 in this framework document rather than to intervene in how GRVA would structure its work plan. For this reason, it did not provide much details on these aspects. The representative of the European Union clarified that the said ongoing activities would be addressed as a part of the identified priorities included in the table contained in the document.
41. The representatives of Australia, China, European Union and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland welcomed the document.
42. The representative of Japan thanked all involved delegates for their efforts to prepare a framework document for automated/autonomous vehicles based on the contributions from the European Union and the United States of America, including the prioritized topics and working management, as the framework document was vital to coordinate the activities and solve concerns of stakeholders.
43. He also mentioned that Japan would support this direction and emphasized the importance of further discussions based on informal document WP.29-177-19, which was submitted for discussion at this session of WP.29.
44. He stated that the special session of GRVA in June 2019, before the next session of WP.29, would be a good opportunity to discuss ToRs based on the document as well as the draft regulations on cyber security and software update. He also expressed the willingness of Japan to contribute to discussions for the establishment of those items.
45. He recalled the internal discussions, at political level, about the external Human Machine Interface (HMI) related to automated/autonomous vehicles, specified in the formal document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. He underlined the importance of the function, informing the surrounding of the vehicle when it is driven in an automated mode above Level 3, to ensure safety of traffic participants around.
46. The World Forum agreed the general approach outlined in WP.29-177-19 and directed GRVA to use the issues, topics and deliverables from the document as guidance to inform its further discussions on structuring its work and delivery plans. WP.29-177-19 would be transformed into a formal document for the 178th session. The World Forum expected GRVA to report at the June 2019 session on its proposed structure, and ToRs of informal groups in this respect.
25. The representative of Japan introduced, on behalf of China, European Union, Japan and the United States of America, WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 containing amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 – Framework Document on Automated/autonomous Vehicles. He explained that the amendments included editorial amendments as well as a restructured Table 1 containing details on (i) current activities, (ii) expected future activities and (iii) references to the key safety principles mentioned in the document.
26. The representative of the Republic of Korea introduced WP.29-178-19, proposing additional amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34. The representative of Sweden proposed to insert into Table 1 considerations related to para. 4 (j) regarding vehicle inspection. The representative of CITA supported the position of the representative of Sweden.
27. WP.29 adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 as amended by WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 and requested the secretariat to issue it as a reference document with the symbol ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1.
151. The Chair of AC.3 introduced the documents that were considered under this agenda item. AC.3 considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/31/Rev.1, aimed at providing an updated overview of the priorities of the Programme of Work of the development of UN GTRs or amendments to the existing ones taking into account the decisions on document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 from the 177th WP.29 session (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1145, para. 49). AC.3 referred to the discussions on WP.29-178-10/Rev.2, WP.29-178-19, WP.29-178-16/Rev.1, WP.29-178-17/Rev.2 and WP.29-178-18/Rev.1 under agenda item 2.3. Please note that document WP.29-178-17/Rev.2 does not exist. The amended document WP.29-178-17/Rev.1 was reproduced in Annex VI of the session report.
|
WP.29/2019/34
|
2019-04-18 |
2019-04-18 11:41:23 UTC |
WP.29/2019/0034
|
27 Mar 2019
|
Draft cybersecurity interpretation document pursuant to the ad hoc session
Draft cybersecurity interpretation document pursuant to the ad hoc session
|
Date: 27 Mar 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS1-05
|
2019-03-27 |
2019-03-27 12:29:55 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS1-05
|
27 Mar 2019
|
Agenda for the ad hoc meeting on Cyber Security
Agenda for the ad hoc meeting on Cyber Security
|
Date: 27 Mar 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS1-01/Rev.1
|
2019-03-27 |
2019-03-18 17:01:45 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS1-01/Rev.1
|
25 Mar 2019
|
Cybersecurity draft interpretation document consolidating Netherlands and Germany comments
Cybersecurity draft interpretation document consolidating Netherlands and Germany comments
|
Date: 25 Mar 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS1-04
|
2019-03-25 |
2019-03-27 12:28:48 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS1-04
|
25 Mar 2019
|
Germany comments on the draft Cybersecurity interpretation document (Germany)
Germany comments on the draft Cybersecurity interpretation document
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 22 Mar 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS1-03
|
2019-03-25 |
2019-03-25 08:45:45 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS1-03
|
18 Mar 2019
|
Netherlands comments on the draft Cybersecurity interpretation document (Netherlands)
Netherlands comments on the draft Cybersecurity interpretation document
|
Submitted by: Netherlands
|
Date: 18 Mar 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPahCS1-02
|
2019-03-18 |
2019-03-18 17:05:22 UTC |
TFCS-TPahCS1-02
|
16 Mar 2019
|
Comparison of automated vehicle safety principles (OICA)
Comparison of automated vehicle safety principles
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 15 Mar 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-177-20/Add.1
|
2019-03-16 |
2019-03-16 11:51:21 UTC |
WP.29-177-0020/Add.1
|
14 Mar 2019
|
Proposal for a framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
Proposal for a framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
|
Description
|
Document prepared by the WP.29 secretariat pursuant to discussions held among Contracting Parties during the March 2019 WP.29 session.
|
Date: 14 Mar 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29/2019/34 | Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
Related discussions
25. The representative of Japan introduced, on behalf of China, European Union, Japan and the United States of America, WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 containing amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 – Framework Document on Automated/autonomous Vehicles. He explained that the amendments included editorial amendments as well as a restructured Table 1 containing details on (i) current activities, (ii) expected future activities and (iii) references to the key safety principles mentioned in the document.
26. The representative of the Republic of Korea introduced WP.29-178-19, proposing additional amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34. The representative of Sweden proposed to insert into Table 1 considerations related to para. 4 (j) regarding vehicle inspection. The representative of CITA supported the position of the representative of Sweden.
27. WP.29 adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 as amended by WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 and requested the secretariat to issue it as a reference document with the symbol ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1.
|
WP.29-177-19
|
2019-03-14 |
2019-03-14 10:28:57 UTC |
WP.29-177-0019
|
10 Mar 2019
|
Automated vehicles principles document (USA)
Automated vehicles principles document
|
Submitted by: USA
|
Date: 08 Mar 19
|
Status: Superseded
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
WP.29-177-08
|
2019-03-10 |
2019-03-10 09:14:09 UTC |
WP.29-177-0008
|
28 Feb 2019
|
Cybersecurity regulation interpretation document pursuant to the first TFCS test coordination session
Cybersecurity regulation interpretation document pursuant to the first TFCS test coordination session
|
Date: 28 Feb 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-01-09
|
2019-02-28 |
2019-03-08 15:40:24 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-01-0009
|
26 Feb 2019
|
Discussion points for Interpretation Document on Cybersecurity (Japan and NTSEL)
Discussion points for Interpretation Document on Cybersecurity
|
Submitted by: Japan and NTSEL
|
Date: 25 Feb 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-01-07
|
2019-02-26 |
2019-02-26 09:21:15 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-01-0007
|
19 Feb 2019
|
Comments on the draft cybersecurity regulation interpretation document (Germany)
Comments on the draft cybersecurity regulation interpretation document
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 19 Feb 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-TPCM-01-03 | Draft Cybersecurity regulation interpretation document
|
TFCS-TPCM-01-05
|
2019-02-19 |
2019-02-19 17:30:20 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-01-0005
|
19 Feb 2019
|
Draft Cybersecurity regulation interpretation document
Draft Cybersecurity regulation interpretation document
|
Date: 19 Feb 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
TFCS-TPCM-01-05 | Comments on the draft cybersecurity regulation interpretation document
|
TFCS-TPCM-01-03
|
2019-02-19 |
2019-02-19 17:28:19 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-01-0003
|
19 Feb 2019
|
Provisional terms of reference for the TFCS test phase
Provisional terms of reference for the TFCS test phase
|
Date: 19 Feb 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
TFCS-TPCM-01-02
|
2019-02-19 |
2019-02-19 17:26:09 UTC |
TFCS-TPCM-01-0002
|
4 Feb 2019
|
Issues identified in connection with the work of the TF on CS/OTA
Issues identified in connection with the work of the TF on CS/OTA
|
Date: 31 Jan 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-02-46
|
2019-02-04 |
2019-02-04 14:14:24 UTC |
GRVA-02-0046
|
31 Jan 2019
|
Cybersecurity: Comments on document GRVA/2019/2 (EC)
Cybersecurity: Comments on document GRVA/2019/2
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Date: 30 Jan 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
GRVA-03-16 | Cybersecurity: FIGIEFA responses to the EC on the draft regulation
Related discussions
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
24. The expert from the United Kingdom, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air software updates (TF CS/OTA) reported (GRVA-03-02) on the work of the group (recommendations, a draft regulatory text with provisions for the approval of a manufacturer Cyber Security Management System and provisions for the approval of a vehicle with regards to cyber security), including the ongoing testing activities. He clarified that the outcome of the work did not aim at specifying technical solutions, preventing all kind of cyber security events to happen, securing systems outside of the vehicles (e.g. pendrives), specifying durability requirements, listing all risks and corresponding mitigation solutions, but rather a systems-based approach to security management.
25. He explained that the current testing phase was aimed at checking the robustness of the proposal. He noted that manufacturer involvement represented seventy per cent of the global sales. The expert from AVERE confirmed that North American manufacturers were involved in the testing phase. The output could result in the production of interpretation guidelines if necessary.
26. He answered to the questions raised by the GRVA experts. He confirmed that the work was involving Contracting Parties using the regime of self-certification, but that no Country had indicated their intention to become a sponsor in the sense of the 1998 Agreement.
27. The expert from the European Commission requested clarifications about the purpose of the non-regulatory text in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He noted the importance to define pass/fail criteria (also for audits) in the context of mutual recognition of type approvals. He expressed the need to consider covering hardware updated in this context. He stated that cyber security impacts privacy protection and mentioned other regulations in other jurisdictions that could complement or impact the ongoing work, such as the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
28. The expert from France proposed to revisit the definition of a type in the regulatory draft. He proposed to consider the vehicle architecture as one discriminatory feature.
29. The expert from Germany expressed support to the test phase work and expressed the need to consider lifetime provisions.
30. The expert from CLEPA explained that their industry would have a role to play to support cyber security and asked that GRVA consider provisions that would address their role.
31. The expert from Sweden noted the proposal on slide 16 of GRVA-03-02 “UNECE may decide to develop a harmonized framework on [the post production and vehicle support by the manufacturer] topic” and proposed to reflect on this point.
32. The expert from Spain expressed concern with the lack of guarantee over the whole life cycle and proposed to look at practices of other industry sectors to explore best practices. She also noted that these activities were linked with the activities of existing cyber security authorities and that frameworks were already existing. She stated that the outcome of the test phase should result into amendments instead of interpretation documents.
33. The expert from ITU stated that basic requirements should be built in the communication side and that support provisions could be linked to the life of the communication system (He mentioned as an example the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) protocol shutdown).
34. The expert from FIGIEFA introduced GRVA-03-16 proposing amendments to ECE/TRAN/WP29/GRVA/2019/2. She mentioned the importance for the after sales sector to take into consideration their needs when drafting provisions. She proposed that Approval Authorities should, as neutral entities, determine independently from manufacturers the companies that are authorized parties. She proposed that the Regulation specifies that the manufacturers shall share with authorized parties: data, function calls and resources inside of the vehicle to allow third parties to provide services to maintain safety and security of vehicles during their lifetime. She also proposed to replace throughout the proposal “life cycle” by “life time”.
35. The expert from the United Kingdom, Co-Chair of the Task Force, explained that the Contracting Parties were able to nominate Approval Authorities according to their competencies (1958 Agreement, Article 2, para.2). He explained that the group did not reach consensus on the post production and support duration issue and that in that case existing national regulations would apply. He confirmed that the work of the group did not conflict with other regulations such as the European GDPR. He also confirmed that the group did not discuss in detail the level of access required in GRVA-03-16.
36. The expert from France stated that the Regulation should not freeze the market for repair and maintenance. But he also expressed concerns with safety and cyber security risks posed by automotive product modification and access as proposed in GRVA-03-16. The expert from Sweden also expressed interest to the position expressed in the document and agreed with France on the need for the right balance between access and security.
37. The expert from OICA stated that the access right matter is not a cyber security one. He added that such provisions clarifying access to data for the purpose of balanced market would be relevant for a Regulation dealing with access right issues.
|
GRVA-02-37
|
2019-01-31 |
2019-01-31 09:09:36 UTC |
GRVA-02-0037
|
30 Jan 2019
|
GRVA work priorities - Proposal for a Draft Structure (Germany)
GRVA work priorities - Proposal for a Draft Structure
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Date: 29 Jan 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-02-31
|
2019-01-30 |
2019-01-30 08:40:02 UTC |
GRVA-02-0031
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/2 and GRVA/2019/3 (IMMA)
Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/2 and GRVA/2019/3
|
Description
|
Proposal to exclude L-category vehicles (motorcycles, etc.) from the scope of the cybersecurity and software updates activities.
|
Submitted by: IMMA
|
Date: 28 Jan 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
GRVA/2019/2 | Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
GRVA/2019/3 | Recommendation on Software Updates
Related discussions
17. Due to lack of time, GRVA did not consider ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/13, describing the principles of the “Three-Pillar Approach”, proposed by the experts from OICA (see GRVA-02-09 and GRVA-02-27).
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
27. GRVA noted that the presentation of GRVA-02-03 also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3, that the proposal for a test phase would also apply to the software updates work stream. The expert from Japan also supported the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3. He indicated Japan’s support for the earliest adoption (during this session), since the issue was important and a UN Regulation was needed for the improvement of vehicle safety.
28. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
29. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of Category L from the scope of the document.
30. The expert from ITU stated that regulating communication would require specific expertise and that the precedent at the Working Party on General Safety provisions with the UN Regulation No. 144 (Accident Emergency Call Systems) ignored communication aspects and durability provisions. He raised the question whether a vehicle equipped with safety systems based on communication would still be roadworthy in case the communication would no longer function e.g. when the communication system would be obsolete. GRVA agreed that the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates was a good example demonstrating that WP.29 was able to attract the required experts with the right expertise and to make very quick progress on such strategic issues. GRVA agreed about the need to discuss the roadworthiness of vehicles in case of the vehicle communication unit obsolescence would impact the well performing of safety systems.
31. GRVA agreed to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3 and GRVA-01-18 on the agenda of the next GRVA session.
|
GRVA-02-18
|
2019-01-29 |
2019-01-29 08:48:09 UTC |
GRVA-02-0018
|
16 Jan 2019
|
Future Certification of Automated/Autonomous Driving Systems (OICA)
Future Certification of Automated/Autonomous Driving Systems
|
Description
|
Presentation on current OICA thinking on methodologies for the certification or approval of automated vehicles and automated driving systems. This presentation supports document GRVA/2019/13.
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Date: 14 Jan 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-02-09
|
2019-01-16 |
2019-01-16 01:51:26 UTC |
GRVA-02-0009
|
9 Jan 2019
|
Status report of the Cybersecurity and Software Updates Task Force
Status report of the Cybersecurity and Software Updates Task Force
|
Date: 08 Jan 19
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
|
GRVA-02-03
|
2019-01-09 |
2019-01-09 11:16:07 UTC |
GRVA-02-0003
|
3 Jan 2019
|
Priority topics for automated and connected vehicles
Priority topics for automated and connected vehicles
|
Date: 21 Dec 18
|
Status: WP.29 amended and adopted
|
More information
|
Related regulations or topics
Related documents
WP.29-176-28 | Identified priority topics for automated /connected vehicles only
GRVA-02-44 | Current allocation of the priorities (in document WP.29/2019/2) to the IWGs of GRVA.
GRVA-02-42 | Proposal for a new GRVA structure based on document WP.29/2019/2
Related discussions
51. The Chair of GRVA introduced WP.29-176-28 which sets out the priority areas on which GRVA should focus. He explained that the document was based on WP.29-175-29 submitted jointly by Japan and the European Union. He reminded the World Forum of his consultation with the WP.29 delegations and explained that document WP.29-176-28 was an attempt to summarize the responses into strategic issues. He described several detailed topics such as cyber security and automated steering where discussions were well advanced but also mentioned ongoing discussions on the functional requirements of automated vehicles and consideration of a new approach to assessing their performance. He invited delegates to provide comments on his proposed list by mid-December 2018.
52. The representative of the Netherlands noted that WP.29-176-28 did not provide a general framework but that it specifically addressed GRVA activities. The Chair of WP.29 confirmed that the framework does indeed contain activities beyond those of GRVA.
5. The Chair introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 proposing priorities related to WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies activities on Automated Driving Vehicles (ADVs).
6. The expert from Japan mentioned that the framework document work stream proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 should be based on the existing national and regional guidelines to provide the big picture of what GRVA should do. GRVA agreed to make progress on this work stream but noted some minor variations in the precise understanding of what this document should include: a document setting principles and guidelines (compiling existing guidelines) and a document that would also have an operational dimension to guide the future work on ADVs.
7. GRVA also reviewed the other priority items listed in the document and agreed that these priorities proposed can be addressed by GRVA.
8. GRVA discussed the need to address both the activities already started as well as the short-term priorities. Therefore, GRVA discussed the potential structure of GRVA to best address these current activities as well as the new short-term priorities defined in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. Several proposals for a new structure were presented
(GRVA-02-31, GRVA-02-40, GRVA-02-42 and GRVA-02-47). The Chair also submitted GRVA-02-41 with draft Terms of Reference (ToR) and Rules of Procedures (RoP) for a new Informal Working Group (IWG).
9. The secretariat drafted at the end of the session a consolidation of inputs made by the Contracting Parties during the discussions (GRVA-02-44). GRVA agreed with this consolidation in form of a table as reproduced in Annex II, with the expectation that this would provide a base for continued discussions at the March 2019 session of WP.29.
|
WP.29/2019/2
|
2019-01-03 |
2019-01-04 10:31:51 UTC |
WP.29/2019/0002
|