Brief NHTSA update on US data-collection and analysis activities regarding electric vehicle safety.

Toyota Motor North America presentation on the draft electric vehicle safety GTR.

Discussion presentation on:

1. Effect of Induced Metal Contaminants on Lithium-ion Cell Safety
2. Detection of Cell Internal Shorts
3. Industry Field Experience.

Table of stakeholder responses to questions and other comments on elements of the EVS GTR.

R] Statistical analysis of Water immersion test.pptx

Please note, the OICA document apparently makes an erroneous reference to EVS-15-44.

JRC questions regarding the China submission on li-ion battery thermal runaway caused toxics and analysis (EVS-15-42/502).

JRC questions concerning document EVS-15-41/616.

JRC questions regarding EVS-15-40/A02.

JRC questions on the ISO submission EVS-15-38/615.

JRC questions concerning OICA submission EVS-15-36/613.

45. The expert from EC introduced GRSP-63-31, which provides an overview of the recently adopted Revision of the General Safety Regulation and Pedestrian Safety Regulation of the European Union. He explained that among the most important items addressed by the revision, of concern to GRSP, was the extension of the pedestrian vehicle test zone to include windscreen area. He said that the adopted revision would be followed‑up by proposals to GRSP to align the UN Regulations under its responsibility.

Road map for Transport Canada’s research plans on Electric Vehicle Safety with NRC

US white paper to facilitate arrival at a common understanding among EVS IWG contracting parties on thermal runaway propagation.

Summary list of WP.29 parties’ EV research activities.

Japan input on thermal propagation and methods of initiation in battery system.

Presentation on ISO 17840, proposal for “General Rescue Keys” (e.g., power shutoff), and RETEX crash database experience.

Response to US and other CP’s request to provide more industry examples for handling problems like thermal propagation.

Workshop report: summary & outcomes (JRC Petten, Netherlands, 8-9 March 2018)

OICA questions in response to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

Japan response to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

China response to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

JRC responses to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”

Korea responses to EVS action item 2: “All members identify specific questions in the white paper to contracting parties for agreement in order to continue with research.”