|
07 series of amendments
(1998)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(1999)
|
7
|
1
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2000)
|
7
|
2
|
|
|
|
06 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 1
(1999)
|
6
|
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 1
(2000)
|
7
|
|
1
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
| Corrigendum 1
(2001)
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to Revision 4
(2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 2 to Revision 4
(2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
07 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2007)
|
7
|
3
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
(2009)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to Revision 4 of the Regulation
(2003)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 2 to Revision 4 of the Regulation
(2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2012)
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(2014)
|
Proposal as approved by the GRSP to introduce new provisions for folding seats.
|
WP.29/2013/105
|
|
Discussion from 161st WP.29 session
|
|
[Proposal adopted.]
|
|
8
|
2
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 3
(2016)
|
Proposal to define the moment of inertia in the luggage-impact test as “0.3 ± 0.05 kgm2 (around all 3 principal axis of inertia of the luggage blocks)”. UN R17 presently lacks such a definition, resulting in variations in trajectory and behavior of the luggage cubes before and after impact. This proposal would also correct a reference to UN R25 to refer to the 04 series of amendments rather than to the 03 series of amendments.
|
WP.29/2015/47
|
|
8
|
3
|
|
|
|
08 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(2018)
|
Proposal to clarify the testing of seats with and without head restraints. This proposal would allow alternatives at the request of the manufacturer by clarifying that under testing of a bench seat with three seating positions and two head restraints, a moment of 3 × 373Nm shall be applied to the back of seats and of 2 × 373Nm to the head restraints: - If the manufacturer wants to comply with the test requirements of paragraph 6.2. (strength of the seat-back), by the test of head restraint performance of paragraph 6.4., they choose to apply 53 daNm to each seat back without head restraint and 89 daN to each head restraint. In this case only one test shall be performed.
- If the manufacturer chooses not to apply 53 daNm, during the test of paragraph 6.4., the seat back strength test of paragraph 6.2. has to be performed in addition to the test of paragraph 6.4.
|
WP.29/2017/122
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2017/122) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R17 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
8
|
4
|
|
|
|
09 series of amendments
(2019)
|
Proposal to require seat belt components such as retractors to remain functional if damaged during the load-retention test according to Annex 9 of UN R17. Such components have occasionally been damaged during testing such that their functionality has been impaired. In order to ensure adequate occupant safety, this proposal would require all safety-belt components to be included in the test installation and require post-test inspection to confirm the continued functionality. The transitional provisions phase in the new requirements during September 2020-September 2022.
|
WP.29/2018/142
|
|
Discussion from 176th WP.29 session
|
|
117. The representative of the United States of America presented proposals on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/141 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/142 under agenda items 4.8.15 and 4.7.16, to amend UN Regulations Nos. 16 and 17. The World Forum recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/142) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 48 applying UN R17 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Corrigendum 1 to Revision 5
(2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 series of amendments
(Adopted by WP.29)
|
GRSP proposal to transpose provisions of UN Global Technical Regulation No. 7, Phase 2 into UN Regulation No. 17.
|
WP.29/2020/106
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/106) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 50 applying UN R17 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
09 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(2020)
|
Proposal to clarify the possibility to install side-facing seats in buses of category M2 and M3 of classes A and I.
|
WP.29/2019/35
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/35) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R17 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
|
09 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 1
(2019)
|
Proposal to correct the cross-reference to paragraph 5.11. in paragraph 6.4.3.5. The text should refer to paragraph 5.12.
|
WP.29/2019/116
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2019/116) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R17 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
9
|
|
1
|
|
|
10 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
|
WP.29/2023/115/Corr.1
|
|
Discussion from 191st WP.29 session
|
|
19. GRSP note that WP.29 at its November 2023 session had returned ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2023/115 to GRSP for further revision (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1175, paragraph 106). The expert from OICA, explained that the proposal of Supplement 1 to the 10 series of amendments had already been incorporated in the 11 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 17 that had been adopted at the November 2023 session of WP.29. He further explained that this supplement would imply a new provision that would enter into force immediately creating problems to manufacturers. Therefore, he suggested that the proposal be withdrawn. The expert from Germany, author of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2023/115, insisted that the proposal was still needed. He offered to revise the proposal for further discussion at the May 2024 session of GRSP.
|
|
Proposal to enable approval of all vehicles and seating positions with regard to the strength of seats and their anchorages and with regard to their head restraints (in addition to M1 and N1) under UN R17. (Note: WP.29 deferred a decision on adoption of this proposal during the November 2023 session.)
|
WP.29/2023/115
|
|
Discussion from 191st WP.29 session
|
|
19. GRSP note that WP.29 at its November 2023 session had returned ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2023/115 to GRSP for further revision (see ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1175, paragraph 106). The expert from OICA, explained that the proposal of Supplement 1 to the 10 series of amendments had already been incorporated in the 11 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 17 that had been adopted at the November 2023 session of WP.29. He further explained that this supplement would imply a new provision that would enter into force immediately creating problems to manufacturers. Therefore, he suggested that the proposal be withdrawn. The expert from Germany, author of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2023/115, insisted that the proposal was still needed. He offered to revise the proposal for further discussion at the May 2024 session of GRSP.
|
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
|
11 series of amendments
(Formal WP.29 review)
|
Proposal to ensure that only safe head restraints are fitted to seats of any seating position in all vehicle categories within the scope of UN R17 and to extend the test performance of paragraph 5.7.4 (height retention of head restraints) to non-adjustable head restraint with only one position of use.
|
WP.29/2023/106
|
|
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2023/106) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-seven Contracting Parties out of the 52 applying UN R17 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
11
|
|
|
|