4. (b)
|
Deliverables of the Informal Working Group on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles
GRVA may wish to be briefed on the outcome of the first meeting of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV).
GRVA-05-40 | FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
|
Document Title: FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-40
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA-05-40 | FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
|
Document Title: FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-40
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA-05-40 | FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
|
Document Title: FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-40
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA-05-41 | Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
|
Document Title: Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-41
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA-05-41 | Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
|
Document Title: Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-41
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA-05-41 | Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
|
Document Title: Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-41
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA is expected to review, according to the framework document (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 as revised), common functional requirements on existing national/regional guidelines and other relevant reference documents (1958 and 1998 Agreements).
GRVA-05-40 | FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
|
Document Title: FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-40
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA-05-40 | FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
|
Document Title: FRAV status report: Functional Performance Requirements for Automated Driving Systems and ADS-Equipped Vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-40
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA-05-41 | Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
|
Document Title: Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-41
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
GRVA-05-41 | Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
|
Document Title: Automated driving: FRAV informal group status report
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-05-41
|
Meeting Session: 5th GRVA session (10-14
Feb 2020)
|
Document date: 11 Feb 20 (Posted 11 Feb 20)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 5 | 10-14
Feb 2020
18. The expert from the United States of America, Co-Chair of the IWG on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles (FRAV) summarized the group’s work (GRVA-05-40 and GRVA-05-41). He noted that FRAV has held two full meetings contiguous with VMAD and with more than 100 experts. He highlighted the group’s concern to use accurate terms. The group discouraged the use of “autonomous” as misleading and uses “Minimal”, not “Minimum”, Risk Manoeuvres (MRM) because an MRM responds to road conditions and best available solutions. In addition to avoidance of injury or death and compliance with traffic laws, the group noted additional aspects such as behaviour consistent with safe and fluid traffic flows and attention to economic consequences such as destruction of property. He reported that the group had identified automated vehicle configurations that fall outside the category definitions of Special Resolution S.R.1. He also suggested improvements to the Framework Document on Automated Vehicles (FDAV) would be soon necessary and presented the group’s consensus on high-level requirements. He noted unallocated elements of the FDAV (i.e. vehicle maintenance and inspection, consumer education and training, crashworthiness and compatibility, and post-crash Automated Vehicle (AV) behaviour) pertinent to functional safety. He announced planned meetings in Paris (April 2020) and California (September 2020).
|
WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1 | Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
|
|
Document Title: Framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1
|
Meeting Session: 178th WP.29 session (24-28
Jun 2019) and 12th EDR-DSSAD session (2 Mar 2021)
|
Document date: 03 Sep 19 (Posted 03 Sep 19)
|
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
|
This document concerns WP.29 Discussion Topic | Automated Driving Systems, UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management, WP.29 Regulatory Project | Data Storage Systems for Automated Driving, UN Regulation No. 160 | Event Data Recorders, WP.29 Discussion Topic | Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements, and UN Regulation No. 156 | Software Update Processes and Management Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations | Session 178 | 24-28
Jun 2019
25. The representative of Japan introduced, on behalf of China, European Union, Japan and the United States of America, WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 containing amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 – Framework Document on Automated/autonomous Vehicles. He explained that the amendments included editorial amendments as well as a restructured Table 1 containing details on (i) current activities, (ii) expected future activities and (iii) references to the key safety principles mentioned in the document.
26. The representative of the Republic of Korea introduced WP.29-178-19, proposing additional amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34. The representative of Sweden proposed to insert into Table 1 considerations related to para. 4 (j) regarding vehicle inspection. The representative of CITA supported the position of the representative of Sweden.
27. WP.29 adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34 as amended by WP.29-178-10/Rev.2 and requested the secretariat to issue it as a reference document with the symbol ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1.
Working Party on General Safety | Session 117 | 8-11
Oct 2019
72. The Secretary of GRVA introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1, the framework document on automated/autonomous vehicles. He further informed GRSG on the establishment of new IWGs for functional requirements for automated vehicles, validation methods for automated driving, EDR/DSSAD and Cyber Security/OTA.
73. Following questions from delegates, GRSG noted that elements related to human-machine interface (HMI) and other activities than driving that were currently under discussion at the Global Forum for Road Safety (WP.1) would also be covered under IWG on functional requirements for automated vehicles, while elements for driver monitoring were still discussed by IWG on Automated Controlled Steering Functions (ACSF).
Working Party on Passive Safety | Session 66 | 10-13
Dec 2019
52. The secretary of the Working Party on Automated/Autonomous and Connected Vehicles (GRVA) informed GRSP about the progress of work of his group. The representative of the United States of America reminded GRSP about the framework document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/34/Rev.1, endorsed by the World Forum, on priority topics for automated and connected vehicles. The expert from the United States of America reiterated that even though automated vehicles were different from conventional vehicles for many aspects, crashworthiness remained relevant and that the framework document would be implemented by related topics stemming from the activities of GRSP. The expert from Germany announced that a document showing passive safety priority topics would be presented at the May 2020 session of GRSP.
|
|
|
|